Patriots Cameraman

[MasterOfPuppets]

don't you think they'ed have checked the tape for evidence, before sending it to the proper authorities?

[Livinginthe past]

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets

don't you think they'ed have checked the tape for evidence, before sending it to the proper authorities?

Evidence of what?

The guy is stood their wearing his Patriots I.D. - he's already been accused of this nonsense once before.

What could he have on that camera?

A simple case of throwing some mud at the wall and seeing what sticks.

[Atlanta Dan]

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets

don't you think they'ed have checked the tape for evidence, before sending it to the proper authorities?

Chain of custody - can't tamper with evidence (I actually am not joking about that).

I really do not know who other than the Commissioner is the "proper authority" here, unless the Pats are in really big trouble and have pi**ed off Steve Sabol and NFL Films by poaching on NFL Films exclusive right to film the action from the sidelines.

If so, no more hagiographic depictions of Chick & Tom Terrific by the NFL's Ministry of Propoganda - instead next year's highlight film will be titled "The 2007 New England Patriots - Legacy of Shame"

[MasterOfPuppets]

Originally Posted by Livinginthe past

Evidence of what?

The guy is stood their wearing his Patriots I.D. - he's already been accused of this nonsense once before.

What could he have on that camera?

A simple case of throwing some mud at the wall and seeing what sticks.

i'd say pointing a camera at the coordinator sending in the plays for an unreasonable amount of time ,could be looked upon as evidence. apparently twice now,its been the case.

[MasterOfPuppets]

Originally Posted by Atlanta Dan

Chain of custody - can't tamper with evidence (I actually am not joking about that).

I really do not know who other than the Commissioner is the "proper authority" here, unless the Pats are in really big trouble and have pi**ed off Steve Sabol and NFL Films by poaching on NFL Films exclusive right to film the action from the sidelines.

If so, no more hagiographic depictions of Chick & Tom Terrific by the NFL's Ministry of Propoganda - instead next year's highlight film will be titled "The 2007 New England Patriots - Legacy of Shame"

good stuff....

but tampering with evidence,and viewing " possible " evidence to see if there's a legitament case, should be 2 different things.

[HometownGal]

Originally Posted by Livinginthe past

70's Steelers were riddled with steroids.

But wheres the smoke, there's fire

Ahem . . . .

Gee Rodney - where'd ya get those guns and that tree trunk neck?

[RoethlisBURGHer]

Originally Posted by Livinginthe past

70's Steelers were riddled with steroids.

Can't prove it, of course.

But wheres the smoke, there's fire

Yeah...and in the 70's 'roids were readily available, not illegal, and not a banned substance. Not to mention Steelers from that era have admitted to using them. Mike Webster is the most notable of them all.

[Atlanta Dan]

Originally Posted by RoethlisBURGHer

Yeah...and in the 70's 'roids were readily available, not illegal, and not a banned substance. Not to mention Steelers from that era have admitted to using them. Mike Webster is the most notable of them all.

FWIW my recollection is that while Courson said the O-line was on the juice that Webster always denied using.

[MasterOfPuppets]

Originally Posted by RoethlisBURGHer

Yeah...and in the 70's 'roids were readily available, not illegal, and not a banned substance. Not to mention Steelers from that era have admitted to using them. Mike Webster is the most notable of them all.

i'd bet 3/4 of the nfl were on roids in the 70's........was there a point to this?

[jjpro11]

they've had a couple weird incidents like this now. i really dont know what to make of it, other than it looks just plain childish. maybe its a belichick-mangini thing again. if so, belichick really needs to let that go.