Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
 • Intelligent and friendly discussions.
 • It's free and it's quick. Always.
 • Enter events in the forums calendar.
 • Very user friendly software.
 • Exclusive contests and giveaways.

 Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
 Our 2014 Goal: $450.00 - To Date: $450.00 (100.00%)
 Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact Pittsburgh Steelers Forum Feed Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.

Go Back   Steelers Fever Forums > Steelers Football > Pittsburgh Steelers


Steelers Fever Fan Shop

Doc's Sports Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.

Steelers

LOL

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-25-2007, 07:06 PM   #1
tony hipchest
IRONMAN a.k.a. Tony Stark
Supporter
 
tony hipchest's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Give me back my game...
Posts: 40,306
Member Number: 658
Thanks: 2,316
Thanked 10,371 Times in 4,307 Posts
Default Starting field position cost us in Denver?

everyone has blamed the offense, defense, coaching, and execution. lets take a look at how field position and special teams contribute.

(some great research and statistical analysis):

http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=090...o&confirm=true

Quote:
There are many factors that contribute to winning and losing every week. Which team has the better quarterback, who wins the turnover battle, a critical call by an official or a missed field goal can all determine the outcome of a game.

One often overlooked issue, though, is field position. In Week 7, the teams that had better starting position were 11-3. Through the first six weeks of the season the three teams with the best starting field position were a combined 15-1 while the three with the worst starting field position were only 4-12. A stat this telling would make even the most casual football fan sit up and take notice.

[see link for chart]

Football is often called a game of inches, but as the aforementioned statistics indicate, it is also a game of field position. The numbers don't lie. Defensive-minded head coaches always play the field position game.

Heading into last weekend, only three teams had a differential in starting field position of six yards or more -- that is, their averager starting position was six yards better than their opponents' average start. Those teams are the Steelers (6.9 yards), the Patriots (6.4 yards), and the Colts (6.0 yards). Isn't it interesting that all three head coaches come from the defensive side of the ball?

Both the Colts and Patriots easily won the field position battle again this week. The Patriots had a 13-yard difference and the Colts hit their 6-yard differential right on the nose. The Steelers' starting position in Denver slipped significantly from the 32.9-yard line to 27-yard line and they lost the game by a field goal.

The worst three teams heading into Week 7 were the Broncos, Saints and Bengals. As pointed out above, Denver made huge strides in this area during its victory. The Bengals started on a field two yards shorter than their previous five-game average and also won. The Saints, also victorious Sunday, were accustomed to opponents starting way out at the 34-yard line but the Falcons were three yard behind that at the 31.

Following Week 7's results, the worst team in the NFL when it comes to where their opponent starts a drive is now the Miami Dolphins. They entered Week 7 with opponents playing on a field 65 yards long. The Patriots played them on a field 69 yards long but the Dolphins offense played on a field 82 yards long. They didn't have a chance.
im not sure if this article is a fancy way to say the team that wins the turnover battle usually wins. im also not sure how a kick return for a td is scored in this data. i assume a returned td would = starting at the opponents 0 yard line.
__________________
tony hipchest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2007, 08:34 PM   #2
slippy
Bench Warmer
 
slippy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY: via Indiana, PA
Posts: 298
Gender: Male
Member Number: 5848
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Starting field position cost us in Denver?

nice anecdotal evidence. usually the best teams are good all around; the best teams also have a + turnover ratio and limited injuries.

you can't take one aspect and make it all important. football teams are a delicate web of many variables (too many to count). the colts, previous to last year, are a good example. they seemed to have it all for many years in a row, only to see one strand of the web unravel each year in the playoffs, causing their defeat.

i've seen enough of rossum! one TD and 20 for no gain gets an F in my ledger. although at least he hangs onto the ball, unlike last year's returners.
slippy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2007, 08:43 PM   #3
tony hipchest
IRONMAN a.k.a. Tony Stark
Supporter
 
tony hipchest's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Give me back my game...
Posts: 40,306
Member Number: 658
Thanks: 2,316
Thanked 10,371 Times in 4,307 Posts
Default Re: Starting field position cost us in Denver?

Quote:
Originally Posted by slippy View Post

i've seen enough of rossum! one TD and 20 for no gain gets an F in my ledger. although at least he hangs onto the ball, unlike last year's returners.
and that, in itself is a huge difference in the starting field position last year vs this year. helps contribute to a 4-2 turn around from 2-4. it seems to be tomlins opening philosophy that its not as much about the yards you gain on ST as opposed to the ones you lose.
__________________
tony hipchest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2007, 09:00 PM   #4
Preacher
Living Legend
 

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,890
Member Number: 16327
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Starting field position cost us in Denver?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tony hipchest View Post
and that, in itself is a huge difference in the starting field position last year vs this year. helps contribute to a 4-2 turn around from 2-4. it seems to be tomlins opening philosophy that its not as much about the yards you gain on ST as opposed to the ones you lose.
Anyone ever wonder if the issue was really Rossum... or if the issue was the fact that our players still don't know how to block and create lanes for Rossum and comp. to run in?
Preacher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2007, 09:21 PM   #5
NV STEELERS 723
Assistant Coach
Supporter
 
NV STEELERS 723's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,093
Gender: Male
Member Number: 2572
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Starting field position cost us in Denver?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Preacher View Post
Anyone ever wonder if the issue was really Rossum... or if the issue was the fact that our players still don't know how to block and create lanes for Rossum and comp. to run in?
Yea I agree too..you can't have lanes w/ out blocking... Ben or Brady can't pass w/out their O line...I think Rossum is fine... he's pretty fast ..our punt blocking really sucks though...I guess its something we just have to work on..
__________________
" If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player , and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler" - Jack Lambert
NV STEELERS 723 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2007, 10:41 PM   #6
slippy
Bench Warmer
 
slippy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY: via Indiana, PA
Posts: 298
Gender: Male
Member Number: 5848
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Starting field position cost us in Denver?

good point NV.

i guess i'm unimpressed with the return team as a whole and not just rossum. again, at least he does not fumble.
slippy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2007, 10:45 PM   #7
steeler625
Water Boy
 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8
Member Number: 6116
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Starting field position cost us in Denver?

Pretty good info, but there are many reason why we should have won that game.
steeler625 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2007, 04:53 AM   #8
Galax Steeler
The Virginia Hillbilly
Supporter
 
Galax Steeler's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Galax Va
Posts: 103,678
Gender: Male
Member Number: 3287
Thanks: 1,333
Thanked 3,760 Times in 1,585 Posts
My Mood: Lurking
Default Re: Starting field position cost us in Denver?

Quote:
Originally Posted by steeler625 View Post
Pretty good info, but there are many reason why we should have won that game.
Agreed they were more than one reason we lost that game.
Galax Steeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2007, 02:32 PM   #9
HometownGal
Living Legend
 
HometownGal's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Burgh
Posts: 21,479
Gender: Female
Member Number: 2413
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Starting field position cost us in Denver?

Quote:
Originally Posted by slippy View Post
good point NV.

i guess i'm unimpressed with the return team as a whole and not just rossum. again, at least he does not fumble.

My sentiments exactly. I can't say I am that disappointed in Rossum - he can only run where there's an open lane and there haven't been many of those in recent weeks.
__________________


The Anti-Wahoo
HometownGal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2007, 02:38 PM   #10
rbryan
Team President
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Maui by way of New Brighton PA
Posts: 2,030
Member Number: 5196
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Starting field position cost us in Denver?

Quote:
Originally Posted by slippy View Post
good point NV.

i guess i'm unimpressed with the return team as a whole and not just rossum. again, at least he does not fumble.
We lost 2 or 3 games last year due to fumbles on k/o and punts. Rossum is doing just fine.

I guess people are forgetting that he already returned one for a TD
rbryan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum
no new posts