Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
 • Intelligent and friendly discussions.
 • It's free and it's quick. Always.
 • Enter events in the forums calendar.
 • Very user friendly software.
 • Exclusive contests and giveaways.

 Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
 Our 2014 Goal: $450.00 - To Date: $450.00 (100.00%)
 Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact Pittsburgh Steelers Forum Feed Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.

Go Back   Steelers Fever Forums > Steelers Football > Pittsburgh Steelers


Steelers Fever Fan Shop

Doc's Sports Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.

Steelers Bucs

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-29-2007, 11:44 AM   #1
Rotorhead
Head Coach
Supporter
 
Rotorhead's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,848
Gender: Male
Member Number: 703
Thanks: 111
Thanked 620 Times in 342 Posts
My Mood: Relaxed
Default An Idea fixing the Oline issues

I feel we should put 2 backs in the backfield every play from here on out. We need a lead blocker on running plays, and we can have an extra blocker on the blitzing side for pass plays (the second back can go to the flat for dumpoffs). If there is no blitzer, than we have both sides for a dumpoff pass and Ben can choose the more open player. We can use Najeh or Spaeth for the second back on passing plays (like shotgun with FWP and Najeh/Spaeth on either side of him) and anyone as a lead blocker on running plays. I feel this will vastly improve our blocking as we will have an extra blocker at all times. This is my fix for our oline the rest of the season, Whaddya think?
Rotorhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 01:27 PM   #2
Steelman16
Team President
 
Steelman16's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,414
Member Number: 6517
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: An Idea fixing the Oline issues

Maybe, but nothing replaces the O-Line. If you have alot of issues with them, nothing will really fix it except the O-linesmen themselves.

That's my take.
__________________
I'll keep my freedoms, my guns, and my
money . . . you can keep "THE CHANGE."
Steelman16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 03:09 PM   #3
GeneralRobinson
Bench Warmer
 

Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 374
Member Number: 5611
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: An Idea fixing the Oline issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rotorhead View Post
I feel we should put 2 backs in the backfield every play from here on out. We need a lead blocker on running plays, and we can have an extra blocker on the blitzing side for pass plays (the second back can go to the flat for dumpoffs). If there is no blitzer, than we have both sides for a dumpoff pass and Ben can choose the more open player. We can use Najeh or Spaeth for the second back on passing plays (like shotgun with FWP and Najeh/Spaeth on either side of him) and anyone as a lead blocker on running plays. I feel this will vastly improve our blocking as we will have an extra blocker at all times. This is my fix for our oline the rest of the season, Whaddya think?
Interesting idea. Ideally, it would have to be a split back formation since an I formation would position the full back too close to the LOS to block an outside blitzer. Plus, unless you are going to hand the ball to the fullback during running plays, that would mean using Willie as a lead blocker. I can see Willie on a DB but having to block a line backer would not be ideal. I love well-rounded players and favor them over the specialists in today's game, guys that don't need to be sub'd on third down. A full back and tail back that could carry the ball 10-15 times a game each (for the tail back, maybe 20 times), block, and be an effective receiver would be my wish.
GeneralRobinson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 03:20 PM   #4
Rhee Rhee
Head Coach
 
Rhee Rhee's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 808 state
Posts: 1,890
Gender: Male
Member Number: 7579
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: An Idea fixing the Oline issues

i agree this is a very good idea it's just that.. those dumpoff passes will only gain 3-4 yards per completetion because the ball carriers will quickly be wrapped up... BUT i do agree that it will help.. i remember the year we went 15-1 and we played the Eagles we did something very similar to this... we had two backs like jerome and deuce... or dan and we'd block one and send the other.. it worked OK against the eagles pass rush....
__________________
Rhee Rhee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 03:34 PM   #5
19ward86
Head Coach
 
19ward86's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, Ohio
Posts: 1,978
Gender: Male
Member Number: 2717
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: An Idea fixing the Oline issues

we need to go back to running our 2-3 TE formations like we did at the beginning of the season, we have been trying to run with only 1 TE this year. we have not stretched the field enough this year at all either. we have 3 TE that i feel can make plays in our offense but injuries have limited the backups play(tuman and spaeth). now we are completely healthy at TE we need to go back, im not sure why we changed in the first place.
__________________
[YOUTUBE]PGrTvNzGCZE[/YOUTUBE]
You must watch this video.
19ward86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 03:51 PM   #6
SteelerFanInCA
Team President
Supporter
 
SteelerFanInCA's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 2,180
Gender: Male
Member Number: 875
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: An Idea fixing the Oline issues

Quote:
Originally Posted by 19ward86 View Post
we need to go back to running our 2-3 TE formations like we did at the beginning of the season, we have been trying to run with only 1 TE this year. we have not stretched the field enough this year at all either. we have 3 TE that i feel can make plays in our offense but injuries have limited the backups play(tuman and spaeth). now we are completely healthy at TE we need to go back, im not sure why we changed in the first place.
Aren't we still missing Tuman? I like the 3 TE set but who would be our 3rd TE at this point?
SteelerFanInCA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 04:33 PM   #7
lilyoder6
locked behind Xanax bars
 
lilyoder6's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Playin' touch football, on marijuana street
Posts: 6,388
Gender: Male
Member Number: 2568
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: An Idea fixing the Oline issues

well they did put deker on the list as 3rd Te... i would start getting gary russell learning how to block and catch and try try him at 3rd TE...
__________________

Beer is proof God loves us and wants us to be happy ~ Ben Franklin
Freedom: some use it, Everyone enjoys it, A few defend it.
lilyoder6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 06:19 PM   #8
GeneralRobinson
Bench Warmer
 

Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 374
Member Number: 5611
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: An Idea fixing the Oline issues

I was thinking that one way to run out of split backs without having to rely on a lead blocking running back is to run a quick trap play.
GeneralRobinson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2007, 03:51 AM   #9
Galax Steeler
The Virginia Hillbilly
Supporter
 
Galax Steeler's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Galax Va
Posts: 99,183
Gender: Male
Member Number: 3287
Thanks: 1,144
Thanked 3,412 Times in 1,440 Posts
My Mood: Lurking
Default Re: An Idea fixing the Oline issues

Tuman was a big part of the offense when he went out that was a big hit for us.
Galax Steeler is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2007, 10:04 AM   #10
Rotorhead
Head Coach
Supporter
 
Rotorhead's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,848
Gender: Male
Member Number: 703
Thanks: 111
Thanked 620 Times in 342 Posts
My Mood: Relaxed
Default Re: An Idea fixing the Oline issues

Well there are alot of things you can run out of split backs, one of the reasons I like the idea. I know FWP is not the best blocker but giving Ben at least 2 more seconds by slowing the rush would make all the difference in the world. Another issue with the sacks is Holmes being hurt, earlier this year, when protection broke down he and Ben were on the same page and he would always come back to make a play for the ball (and Ben would look for that), him being out changes that and I don't feel he has the confidence/comfort level with the other receivers.
Rotorhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum
no new posts