Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
 • Intelligent and friendly discussions.
 • It's free and it's quick. Always.
 • Enter events in the forums calendar.
 • Very user friendly software.
 • Exclusive contests and giveaways.

 Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
 Our 2014 Goal: $450.00 - To Date: $450.00 (100.00%)
 Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact Pittsburgh Steelers Forum Feed Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.

Go Back   Steelers Fever Forums > Steelers Football > Pittsburgh Steelers


Steelers Fever Fan Shop

Doc's Sports Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.

Steelers

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-16-2007, 03:25 PM   #1
Big D
Living Legend
Supporter
 
Big D's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2006
Location: living in the field of dreams
Posts: 3,330
Gender: Male
Member Number: 2313
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Is it time to switch to the tampa 2?

with how unimpressive this defense looked, if lebeau does retire do you all think we should switch to the tampa 2?
Big D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2007, 04:43 PM   #2
xXTheSteelKingsXx
Team Owner
 
xXTheSteelKingsXx's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,636
Gender: Male
Member Number: 5803
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Is it time to switch to the tampa 2?

At this point we do not have the personell for this change and it could be a few years before we are able to build the Tampa 2 defense.
__________________
xXTheSteelKingsXx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2007, 04:45 PM   #3
Jman
Team Captain
 
Jman's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Allentown, PA
Posts: 721
Gender: Male
Member Number: 5903
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Is it time to switch to the tampa 2?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big D View Post
with how unimpressive this defense looked, if lebeau does retire do you all think we should switch to the tampa 2?
We need a line that gets pressure. We have not done a good job of getting pressure. I'd agree with you if I thought it would actually fix the problem.

I would entertain a mixture though...
__________________
"There is a way that seems right to man, but its end is the way of death"
Book of Proverbs / The Bible
Jman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2007, 05:20 PM   #4
noto45
Bench Warmer
 
noto45's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington, IL
Posts: 364
Gender: Male
Member Number: 984
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Is it time to switch to the tampa 2?

Man did we Miss Arrrrrrrooooooonnnnnn Smith
__________________


"You play tough, you play smart, and above all ..... you play physical."
noto45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2007, 06:15 PM   #5
Sith Lord
Bench Warmer
 
Sith Lord's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Originally from Tattooine
Posts: 192
Gender: Male
Member Number: 977
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Is it time to switch to the tampa 2?

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO
Sith Lord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2007, 07:26 PM   #6
SteelDogFan
Bench Warmer
 
SteelDogFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 329
Member Number: 5886
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Is it time to switch to the tampa 2?

Its time for the safeties to not let a receiver get behind them.
__________________
SteelDogFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2007, 07:29 PM   #7
tony hipchest
IRONMAN a.k.a. Tony Stark
Supporter
 
tony hipchest's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Give me back my game...
Posts: 40,631
Member Number: 658
Thanks: 2,401
Thanked 10,915 Times in 4,517 Posts
Default Re: Is it time to switch to the tampa 2?

no. while the 3-4 has staying power, the tampa 2 may have run its course. ironically, it was dungy who showed the formula to beat it every time in the super bowl last year.
__________________
tony hipchest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2007, 08:25 PM   #8
RoethlisBURGHer
Living Legend
Supporter
 
RoethlisBURGHer's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Clowns Town,Ohio
Posts: 5,941
Member Number: 370
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Is it time to switch to the tampa 2?

We don't have the personell to run the Tampa 2 defense.

We would need to get bigger defensive ends that pressure the QB, and I don't think we have the safties at the moment to play that style.
__________________

Congrats to the 2009 Stanley Cup Champion Pittsburgh Penguins
RoethlisBURGHer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 12:26 AM   #9
BozMan
Starter
 
BozMan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 409
Gender: Male
Member Number: 3027
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Is it time to switch to the tampa 2?

It might not necessarily be time to switch to Tampa 2, but LeBeau and the D need to rethink some of their schemes.

Specifically, the "Eleven Angry Men" package the Steelers' D use on third and long situations needs to be reevaluated. As this site notes (third item), that formation is vulnerable to run plays. But that's supposed to be okay, since we only use this on obvious passing situations (third and long).

Not this game. I remember several instances where we got the Jags into 3rd and long but allowed them to convert with a running play against the "11 Angry Men".

After the first time in which the Jags converted against this scheme, I thought LeBeau would throw a new wrinkle to it, but alas. Later in the game, Jacksonville again faced third and long, and the Steelers again lined up in the 11 Angry formation (1 down lineman). Again the Jags were not afraid to run the ball, and they again converted.

It would have been nice to see what would have happened if the Steelers had instead only initially line up in the "11 Angry" formation, enticed the Jags to switch to a running play, and then shift to a standard 7 or 8 in the box before the snap to shut down the run.

This would have been analogous to a poker situation in which your opponent is overly aggressive and bluffs too much. When you have a big hand, it's good to occasionally feign weakness and induce him to bluff at you. When Mr. Aggressive fires his bluffs at you, you surprise him at showdown with a monster hand that will win an even bigger pot. Good way to mix up your game and exploit this type of opponent's mistakes and playing tendencies. Then in future hands in which you are actually weak, he won't be so aggressive in trying to steal the pot from you.

So in those subsequent 3rd and longs, the Steelers should have initially lined up in the "11 Angry" scheme, which is vulnerable to a run. This would entice the overly aggressive Del Rio and the Jags to run the ball at them. But this time, it is a fake 11 Angry and the Jags' run attempt gets stuffed.

Then if, later in the game, the Jags faced third and long, and the Steelers lined up with the "11 Angry" look, the Jags won't be so bold in trying to run against it.

With the Jaguars continually converting those 3rd and longs, I'm surprised the Steelers couldn't make some kind of adjustment.
BozMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 12:57 AM   #10
OneForTheToe
Living Legend
 
OneForTheToe's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 3,360
Gender: Male
Member Number: 2408
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Is it time to switch to the tampa 2?

Yes, we don't have the personnel to run the ?Tampa Two.? Also, like every other scheme, the ?Tama Two? has its weaknesses. I have seen too many ?Tampa Two? defenses get manhandled by a physical running game. It happened to Chicago last year. I have seen it happen to the Colts in the past. Even the namesake of the Tampa Two defense, the Buccaneers were gouged a number of times by strong physical running games (the Bus did it to them a couple of times). I know we got manhandled today by the Jags, but this of course, is not the norm.

When it comes down to it, every scheme has its strengths and weaknesses; it's a matter of execution. I just like the flexibility of the 3-4.
OneForTheToe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum
no new posts