Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Steelerland - Southwestern PA
Member Number: 8032
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: NFL needs to challenge the rulings on the field
Interesting from ESPN on the rules and regulations, labeled as a must read under the 2007 NFL Playoffs section:
The football referee in the sandwich-shop commercial steps forward, turns on his microphone and delivers a comical admission to an imaginary crowd:
"I totally blew that call. In fact, it wasn't even close. But don't worry, I'll penalize the other team for no good reason in the second half, to even things up."
Suffice to say, that one did not come from Mike Pereira's office. Pereira, the NFL's officiating director, does have a sense of humor, however. He still chuckles over the elaborate presentations people sent to him following the famous Music City Miracle play during the Buffalo-Tennessee playoff game in January 2000.
Frank Wycheck's lateral to Titans teammate Kevin Dyson resulted in Dyson breaking free for the winning 75-yard touchdown on a kick return in the final seconds. The Bills challenged the ruling, raising the first big test for replay since its return to the NFL earlier that season.
The lines between "reviewable" and "nonreviewable" plays as instant replay applies remained murky this regular season, presenting the prospect of more historic controversy this postseason. A few plays from Cleveland Browns games alone drove home the point that the application -- or non-application -- of replay still can lead to surprises.
Few plays were as surprising as the Music City Miracle.
"Despite all of the engineers and everybody that sent me diagrams about how it was logistically impossible for that ball to be either parallel or backwards, it was a lateral," Pereira said this week.
"You should have seen the things I got, the videos people made to describe flight of ball combined with the velocity of the wind at that point and how the rotation of the ball that would have caused this degree of variation. That was a good one."
While the ruling stood as called, the league periodically revisits replay, looking for ways to improve an imperfect system. Avoiding a mistake during the playoffs is a top priority, but any sport with a 132-page rulebook, 22 players and an oblong ball is bound to produce unanticipated situations.
Here are nine types of plays the NFL lists as falling outside the scope of replay review.
1. Status of the clock
2. Proper down
3. Penalty administration
4. Runner ruled down by defensive contact (not involving fumbles)
5. Forward progress not relating to first down or goal line
7. Recovery of loose ball in the field of play
8. Field goals
9. Inadvertent whistle
Even correct rulings can confuse fans not fully versed in, say, the finer points of Rule 3, Section 21, Article 2. That would be the no-longer-obscure tuck rule that helped New England against Oakland in January 2002.
Referee Walt Coleman used replay to turn Tom Brady's apparent fumble into an incomplete pass, helping New England claim a hard-fought victory in the AFC divisional round. The Patriots won a Super Bowl for the first time a few weeks later.
Coleman got it right according to the letter of the rules, but the most memorable replay situation in NFL history generated controversy among those who thought they knew a fumble when they saw one.
"When a player is holding the ball to pass it forward," the tuck rule states, "any intentional movement forward of his hand starts a forward pass, even if the player loses possession of the ball as he is attempting to tuck it back toward his body."
Another unusual and perhaps unprecedented situation arose during the Cleveland-Cincinnati game two weeks ago. That one avoided widespread detection because the stakes were lower and the play's impact was negligible. But a similar situation in the playoffs conceivably could have an impact on the distance of a late field goal try.
The confusion unfolded when Bengals return man Glenn Holt fielded and returned a short kickoff after a teammate signaled for a fair catch. Cincinnati was not entitled to a return in that situation, but that was the easy part.
"It caught us so by surprise that by the time we got it shut down, we lost track of where the spot was, where the second guy actually caught it," Pereira said, "and as it turns out, we mis-spotted it by about three yards."
The Browns tried to challenge the spot, but when referee Gerald Austin went to look at the play, replay official James Wilson reminded him that the unusual sequence was not subject to review.
"Touching of the kick is reviewable," Pereira explained, "but the actual spot of the end of the kick is not reviewable."
Therein lies one of the more confounding and controversial aspects of replay. If the goal is to get calls right, why not try to get every call right? Why place limits on what is reviewable?
"That is the object of replay, to get the call right, not to decide whether you can review this or whether you can review that," former Green Bay Packers general manager Ron Wolf said. "You have a tool; use it."
As the rulebook states, nonreviewable plays include but are not limited to: status of the clock, proper down, penalty administration, runner ruled down by defensive contact (not involving fumbles), forward progress not relating to first down or goal line, forceouts, recovery of loose ball in the field of play, field goals and inadvertent whistles.
Such limitations do not prevent a referee from using replay to rule on situations outside the scope of what was challenged on the play in question. A coach might challenge the ruling on a fumble, for example, only to have the referee determine the pass was incomplete. Everything reviewable is fair game during every replay.
Referees also can use replay to assess penalties for 12 men on the field, the illegal touching of a pass, the illegal touching of a kick and passing the ball after crossing the line of scrimmage. But if a referee discovers during the course of replay that a cornerback illegally struck a defenseless receiver, he has no recourse because such plays are not reviewable.
"If you tried to get into a fix-all once you were in there, then you get into the area of pass interference, holding and all those other areas that you don't want to be," Pereira said.
"What you want to do is try to deal with plays that involve judgments on a set of facts. Did he get the second foot down inbounds? Did he break the plane? Those types of things."
Three situations could create controversy during the playoffs (coincidentally, all three had an impact on games involving the Browns this season):
1. Spotting the ball in relation to first downs.
Some coaches think replay officials have become too aggressive in challenging spots in relation to first downs. Seattle lost a Week 9 game in Cleveland after replay assistant Al Hynes challenged the spot following Matt Hasselbeck's 8-yard scramble on a third-and-8 play in overtime. Referee Gene Steratore ultimately ruled Hasselbeck down after a 7-yard gain, leading to a Seattle punt and the winning possession for Cleveland.
A similar situation affected the Indianapolis-San Diego game in Week 10.
Spotting the ball in relation to first downs is clearly reviewable, but the practice could draw additional scrutiny in the offseason.
"It seems like I'm beginning to see more challenges of the spot of the ball in relation to the first down, which is a difficult one to judge because you are not dealing with precise lines," Pereira said.
2. Determining whether defenders forced receivers out of bounds.
The forceout rule might be the toughest to enforce. Prevailing opinion has considered forceouts too subjective for review. The league doesn't want referees using replay to guess whether a defender pushed a receiver hard enough to carry him out of bounds. This rule is sure to draw additional scrutiny during the offseason.
Seahawks coach Mike Holmgren, a former member of the competition committee, is among those who have pushed to include forceouts on the list of reviewable plays.
"We were always able to challenge lines -- the sideline, the goal line, the end line -- and that play is very much dealing with a line and a foot," Holmgren said. "I always thought that would be a very reviewable-type replay play; in fact, much easier to call on film than in the heat of battle."
In Week 13, referee Jerome Boger's crew disallowed a potential Browns touchdown by ruling tight end Kellen Winslow out of bounds on a play that would have tied and probably won a game against Arizona. The Browns narrowly missed the playoffs despite a 10-6 record this season.
3. Determining whether a field goal should be allowed. Reviewing all field goals probably isn't realistic because definitive camera angles remain elusive, but another 2007 play involving the Browns could precipitate changes in how replay applies -- or, in the current situation, does not apply -- to the NFL's three-point plays.
Phil Dawson's tying field goal try against Baltimore in Week 11 struck the gooseneck atop the support post before bouncing back through the uprights. Referee Peter Morelli communicated with replay official Howard Slavin before announcing, correctly, that the field goal was good. Moreilli said replay was never used. An NFL spokesman later said the league would consider opening similar plays for review in future seasons.
Dallas can be America's team, the Patriots* can be a dynasty. Just call us Sixburgh, Title Town, THE team with SIX Lombardi trophies. 102.5% Black 'n Gold!