Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
 • Intelligent and friendly discussions.
 • It's free and it's quick. Always.
 • Enter events in the forums calendar.
 • Very user friendly software.
 • Exclusive contests and giveaways.

 Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
 Our 2013 Goal: $400.00 - To Date: $00.00 (00.00%)
 Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact Pittsburgh Steelers Forum Feed Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.

Go Back   Steelers Fever Forums > Miscellaneous > Locker Room


Steelers Fever Fan Shop

Doc's Sports Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.

Steelers Steelers - Bills Bills
August 16th, 2014, 7:30pmET

CBS
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-08-2008, 03:37 AM   #1
SteelersMongol
Living Legend
Supporter
 
SteelersMongol's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ulaanbaatar, MONGOLIA
Posts: 4,083
Gender: Male
Member Number: 2401
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Was Jesus' resurrection a sequel?

Quote:
When David Jeselsohn, a Swiss-Israeli collector, bought this ancient tablet from a Jordanian antiquities dealer, he was unaware of its significance

A 3-ft.-high tablet romantically dubbed "Gabriel's Revelation" could challenge the uniqueness of the idea of the Christian Resurrection. The tablet appears to date authentically to the years just before the birth of Jesus and yet at least according to one Israeli scholar it announces the raising of a messiah after three days in the grave. If true, this could mean that Jesus' followers had access to a well-established paradigm when they decreed that Christ himself rose on the third day and it might even hint that they they could have applied it in their grief after their master was crucified. However, such a contentious reading of the 87-line tablet depends on creative interpretation of a smudged passage, making it the latest entry in the woulda/coulda/shoulda category of possible New Testament artifacts; they are useful to prove less-spectacular points and to stir discussion on the big ones, but probably not to settle them nor shake anyone's faith.

The ink-on-stone document, which is owned by a Swiss-Israeli antiques collector and reportedly came to light about a decade ago, has been dated by manuscript and chemical experts to a period just before Jesus' birth. Some scholars think it may originally have been part of the Dead Sea Scrolls, a trove of religious texts found in caves on the West Bank that were possibly associated with John the Baptist. The tablet is written in the form of an end-of-the-world prediction in the voice of the angel Gabriel; one line, for instance, predicts that "in three days you will know evil will be defeated by justice."

Such "apocalypses," often featuring a triumphant military figure called a messiah (literally, anointed one), were not uncommon in the religious and politically tumultuous Jewish world of 1st century B.C. Palestine. But what may make the Gabriel tablet unique is its 80th line, which begins with the words "In three days" and includes some form of the verb "to live." Israel Knohl, an expert in Talmudic and biblical language at Jerusalem's Hebrew University who was not involved in the first research on the artifact, claims that it refers to a historic 1st-century Jewish rebel named Simon who was killed by the Romans in 4 B.C., and should read "In three days, you shall live. I Gabriel command you." If so, Jesus-era Judaism had begun to explore the idea of a three-day resurrection before Jesus was born.

This, in turn, undermines one of the strongest literary arguments employed by Christians over centuries to support the historicity of the Resurrection (in which they believe on faith): the specificity and novelty of the idea that the Messiah would die on a Friday and rise on a Sunday. Who could make such stuff up? But, as Knohl told TIME, maybe the Christians had a model to work from. The idea of a "dying and rising messiah appears in some Jewish texts, but until now, everyone thought that was the impact of Christianity on Judaism," he says. "But for the first time, we have proof that it was the other way around. The concept was there before Jesus." If so, he goes on, "this should shake our basic view of Christianity. ... What happens in the New Testament [could have been] adopted by Jesus and his followers based on an earlier messiah story."

Not so fast, say some Christian academics...

to continue http://www.time.com/time/world/artic...0.html?cnn=yes
Thought it was interesting. Didn't mean to offend anyone's belief, if I did.
__________________
SteelersMongol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 09:35 AM   #2
revefsreleets
Living Legend
 
revefsreleets's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Akron, Ohio Home of LeBron James
Posts: 15,403
Gender: Male
Member Number: 5353
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Was Jesus' resurrection a sequel?

You have no idea the can of worms you just opened.

Good luck, my firend! Carpal Tunnel Syndrome is headed your way...
__________________
Official Steelersfever Arians Nuthugger
revefsreleets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 10:09 AM   #3
Dino 6 Rings
Living Legend
 
Dino 6 Rings's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Arkansas (formerly New Jersey)
Posts: 8,248
Gender: Male
Member Number: 6891
Thanks: 17
Thanked 57 Times in 32 Posts
Default Re: Was Jesus' resurrection a sequel?

Religion and Politics, what great bed fellows.
__________________
SuperBowl Wins - How many does YOUR team have?
Steelers 6, 49ers 5, Cowboys 5, Packers 4, Giants 4, Redskins 3, Raiders 3, Pats 3, Broncos 2, Dolphins 2, Colts 2, Ravens 2 Bears 1,Jets 1, Bucs 1, Rams 1, Chiefs 1, Saints1
Dino 6 Rings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 10:09 AM   #4
Godfather
Living Legend
Supporter
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,140
Member Number: 547
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Was Jesus' resurrection a sequel?

Quote:
Originally Posted by revefsreleets View Post
You have no idea the can of worms you just opened.

Good luck, my firend! Carpal Tunnel Syndrome is headed your way...
Much ado about nothing. The idea of the Messiah dying and being resurrected existed long before Jesus, which is why the Roman authorities stationed soldiers at Christ's tomb and openly expressed concerns that His followers would steal the body and claim He rose from the dead.

There were also false messiahs in pagan religions that had contact with the Jews and borrowed from the Messianic prophecies.
Godfather is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 10:33 AM   #5
Hammer Of The GODS
Starter
Supporter
 
Hammer Of The GODS's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: I LIVE IN REALITY
Posts: 551
Gender: Male
Member Number: 8148
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Was Jesus' resurrection a sequel?

In 1822 Clement Clarke Moore wrote a poem............about some guy who flys around in a sled pulled by a bunch of trophy deer. To this day millions of children await the visit of this mystery man and his fabled sack of presents!

The resurrection is not unlike that poem. Millions of people await the return of this carpenter turned messiah.

One story is told to children to get them to behave or santa won't come.
The other is told to adults to get them to behave or jesus won't save you from hell.

Question is........ why do we need such stories in order to live a moral life?
__________________
Hammer Of The GODS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 11:21 AM   #6
revefsreleets
Living Legend
 
revefsreleets's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Akron, Ohio Home of LeBron James
Posts: 15,403
Gender: Male
Member Number: 5353
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Was Jesus' resurrection a sequel?

MY favorite Bible fairy tale is Noah's Ark. Following is a complete debunking...it's long but pretty thorough...

http://www.abarnett.demon.co.uk/atheism/noahs_ark.html

Here's a sample:
As an idea of how many insects Noah would have had to take on the ark, here is a list of insect orders with the number of species in each (source - Natural History Museum):


COLLEMBOLA: 6000 eg. springtails
THYSANURA: 370 e.g.. silverfish
EPHEMEROPTERA: 2100 eg. mayflies
ODONATA: 5500 eg. dragonflies
PLECOPTERA: 2000 eg. stoneflies
BLATTODEA: 3700 eg. profanityfilterprofanityfilterprofanityfilterprofa nityfilterroaches
ISOPTERA: 2300 eg. termites
MANTODEA: 1800 eg. mantids
DERMAPTERA: 1800 eg. earwigs
ORTHOPTERA: 20500 eg. grasshoppers
PHASMATODEA: 2500 eg. stick insects
PSCOPTERA: 3200 eg. bark lice
PHTHIRAPTERA: 3000 eg. biting lice
HEMIPTERA: 82000 eg. aphids
THYSANOPTERA: 5000 eg. thrips
MEGALOPTERA: 250 eg. alderflies
RAPHIDIOPTERA: 175 eg. snakeflies
NEUROPTERA: 5000 eg. ant-lions
COLEOPTERA: 400000 eg. beetles
MECOPTERA: 400 eg. scorpion flies
SIPHONAPTERA: 2400 eg. fleas
DIPTERA: 120000 eg. fruit-flies
TRICHOPTERA: 10000 eg. caddisflies
LEPIDOPTERA: 150000 eg. butterflies
HYMENOPTERA: 130000 eg. ants, bees

giving a grand total of approx. 965420 different species of insect, about a million (and these are just the species known to western science. There could be another several million unknown species). Given a male and female, make that at least two million insects aboard the ark, ranging in size from a millimetre, up to six inches in size, many having extremely specialised requirements for life, (not to mention quite an appetite for eating other insects...).
Creationists object to the idea of "species" aboard the Ark, preferring to use "kind" instead. Thus, instead of having nearly a million beetles running around it (beetles not being known for sitting patiently in their pens), Noah simply had a male and female of one "kind" of beetle from which all the others known today have "diversified" (or "evolved", but let's not mention that word). Now, let's say the Flood happened 4,000 years ago, and there are 400,000 known species of beetle. A quick sum tells us that, on average, 100 new species of beetle have evolved (or been Created) every year from those two original parents. That's two new species of beetle a week! In order to explain the current diversity of life, creationists need to conjure up a form of evolution that proceeds at a rate which would make any biologist fall off her stool in astonishment!
__________________
Official Steelersfever Arians Nuthugger
revefsreleets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 11:52 AM   #7
stlrtruck
THE PRINCESS' Daddy
Supporter
 
stlrtruck's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 8,783
Gender: Male
Member Number: 2398
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Was Jesus' resurrection a sequel?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammer Of The GODS View Post
Question is........ why do we need such stories in order to live a moral life?
First, we shouldn't need stories to live a moral life. Our government makes laws and sets boundaries (which continue to be re-established) in order to make determinations on what is socially and morally acceptable. Therefore, one truly does not need to hear or believe the "stories" of Jesus Christ in order to live a good life.

And while I respect your option to not believe, I would be remiss of my duties to point out that while Jesus' teachings and the Bible do give us specifics instructions on how to live a life accordingly it is also Jesus' death on the cross and a belief that He died for our sins and rose three days later so that we may get to heaven and avoid the pit of hell that becomes a focal point. It's faith.

And we all have faith - it is just a matter of where it's directed. And while I have not been miraculously healed or seen any definitive signs I know in my knower that Jesus Christ is real and is more than a story. I've heard people close to me describe healings, and blessings that are more than some coincidence.

So IMHO, it comes down to the following:
1) Are you going to live a moral life and honor the government's laws and self or
2) Are you going to live a life honoring to God?

I know the standards are not the same!

"But if serving the Lord seems undesirable to you, then choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve, whether the gods your forefathers served beyond the River, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land you are living. But as for me and my household, we will serve the Lord." - Joshua 24:15
__________________

60 Minutes, 53 Men, 6 Trophies,1 NATION. . .STEELERS NATION!!!
Sig courtesy of STEELAX04
stlrtruck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 12:12 PM   #8
tony hipchest
IRONMAN a.k.a. Tony Stark
 
tony hipchest's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Give me back my game...
Posts: 38,559
Member Number: 658
Thanks: 1,616
Thanked 6,777 Times in 2,938 Posts
Default Re: Was Jesus' resurrection a sequel?

Quote:
Originally Posted by revefsreleets View Post
MY favorite Bible fairy tale is Noah's Ark. Following is a complete debunking...it's long but pretty thorough...

http://www.abarnett.demon.co.uk/atheism/noahs_ark.html

Here's a sample:
As an idea of how many insects Noah would have had to take on the ark, here is a list of insect orders with the number of species in each (source - Natural History Museum):

i dont think noah collected bugs, just like i dont believe he built 2 huge tanks to save the great white shark, i mean whats the point of saving fish from a flood?

the "fairy tale" must be put into historical context. at the time it was written the world was perceived to be flat and to not extend much further than the visible horizon. 4000 years ago, people in the mid east had no idea about the species in the rain forest or penguins.
__________________
tony hipchest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 12:34 PM   #9
Counselor
Starter
 
Counselor's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 557
Member Number: 5075
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Was Jesus' resurrection a sequel?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tony hipchest View Post
i dont think noah collected bugs, just like i dont believe he built 2 huge tanks to save the great white shark, i mean whats the point of saving fish from a flood?

the "fairy tale" must be put into historical context. at the time it was written the world was perceived to be flat and to not extend much further than the visible horizon. 4000 years ago, people in the mid east had no idea about the species in the rain forest or penguins.
Exactly.

It is quite possible to rationally believe that Noah was a historical figure, built a big boat, had neighbors think he was crazy, load the boat with barnyard/domestic animals and maybe a few others he could gather, there was a big flood (not necessarily the entire earthas we know it) and he, his family, and the animals lived.
Counselor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2008, 01:24 PM   #10
Mosca
Team President
Supporter
 
Mosca's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mountain Top, PA
Posts: 2,397
Gender: Male
Member Number: 1751
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Was Jesus' resurrection a sequel?

Simple. People do what works for them. Some people find religion, some people lose religion, and life goes on.
Mosca is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum
no new posts