Wow! Just wow! REALLY hypocritical of the left...

[Preacher]

Originally Posted by Stlrs4Life

Yeah hypocrsy:

http://www.factcheck.org/askfactchec...ly_cost_4.html

.

Hmmm.

Quite an interesting little story. Too bad it is quite wrong on two main points.

1. We are in a DEFLATIONARY cycle. Homes, cars, gas, etc. etc. is going DOWN, as are salaries. So there is very little adjustment for inflation. Therefore, it WILL cost more.

2. EVEN if it DOESN'T cost more, let's say the same amount is spent, where is the frugal calls from the dems? When we are in a war with a worse economy, why should actions that were considered unfrugal 4 years ago now be ok?

It is STILL called hypocrisy. Try to justify it all you want. it won't go away.

[IronFan]

Originally Posted by GBMelBlount

Ya, but in all fairness, spending was out of control when Bush was in office too. The larger problem is that government spending is completely out of control in general. The government needs to be run like a business, otherwise things will only continue to get worse.....

This^^^

We have a winner.

[Stlrs4Life]

Originally Posted by Preacher

Hmmm.

Quite an interesting little story. Too bad it is quite wrong on two main points.

1. We are in a DEFLATIONARY cycle. Homes, cars, gas, etc. etc. is going DOWN, as are salaries. So there is very little adjustment for inflation. Therefore, it WILL cost more.

2. EVEN if it DOESN'T cost more, let's say the same amount is spent, where is the frugal calls from the dems? When we are in a war with a worse economy, why should actions that were considered unfrugal 4 years ago now be ok?

It is STILL called hypocrisy. Try to justify it all you want. it won't go away.

just showing the cost, the costs were the same. What the original post was about.

[revefsreleets]

No, it was not. The original post was, is, and will continue to be about the hypocrisy of the left. Even IF the costs are the same, the left is just as hypocritical. Why? They made a HUGE stick bout the cost of Bush's inauguration, going on and on and on and on and on ad nauseum about what how wasteful it all was (during a relatively strong economy) and what do they do when their candidate is elected? Do the SAME EXACT THING. That, my friend, is the very definition of hypocrisy.

[xfl2001fan]

Sorry Rev, but it's very different. Bush did it during a relatively strong economy...whereas Obama pulled it off during a declining economy. It's a worse form of hypocrisy.

[SteelShooter]

It figures.............