could mularkey replace wisenhunt....

[Livinginthe past]

Originally Posted by Steel - X

Hey man just busting your chops

Hey - I know it.

Nothing wrong in laying a little smack on the AFC Least.

NM

[Brady12]

Originally Posted by Steel - X

Well we all new this is why the Patriots are in the Playoffs you didnt need to clarify!

Sorry, but the NFC West is the worst division this season And last year And the year before it was the NFC East And then back in 2002 it was the AFC East... Thats also when Cleveland last made the playoffs.

[tony hipchest]

Originally Posted by Brady12

lol i'm not even going to reply to that because it is ridiculous... this is the best record Cleveland has had since they made the playoffs in 2002.

about as ridiculous as your statement regarding mularkey huh? browns best record in 3 years? 6-10. lol quite a turn around there. thats not saying much.

i dont think you know the steelers as much as you think. they did bring back lebeau after he didnt do squat as a head coach in cincinatti, and all he did was put out a top 5 and #1 defense in the league.

but anyways this threads intent is for hypothetical and conversational purposes, not an endorsement for mularkey, as i have already stated i dont think either wiz or 'larkey are getting hired or fired. just curious of who steelerfans think would have an inside track since losing wisenhunt and r. grimm is a possibility.

[tony hipchest]

Originally Posted by Brady12

Sorry, but the NFC West is the worst division this season And last year And the year before it was the NFC East And then back in 2002 it was the AFC East... Thats also when Cleveland last made the playoffs.

sorry but the nfc west and afc east both collectively have 28 wins and the seahawks are a full 3 games up on the patriots. id say the afc east is weaker.

[clevestinks]

Originally Posted by Steel - X

Crennell to me actually made that team better this season. But to me unlike Mularkey, Crennell actually took a lousy Defense and made it better

What defense was that? The defense we scored 41 on with eight sacks two weeks ago? LOL

[Steel - X]

Originally Posted by clevestinks

What defense was that? The defense we scored 41 on with eight sacks two weeks ago? LOL

I was referring to the Pats defense.. .Yeah he really did nothing to the cleveland defense but who really can?

[Ambridge]

Originally Posted by Steel - X

To me Mularkey was way over rated before he got that job with the steelers he didnt have to do much. OK Bettis run the ball and I will throw in a trick play here and there. Never thought he was cut out to be a HC or even a GOOD OC.

To be quite honest I don't think Ken Whisenhunt is all that great either.
There have been some times this season and last year as well where the offensive play calling was quite suspect.
If you notice on occasion Whisenhunt is very "Mularkey-esque" with the very predictable 3rd down and long screen plays and the waste of a down reverse calls.

I remember the most angry I ever was at Mularkey was when the Steeler played the Jets in a blizzard in the Meadowlands a couple of seasons ago and the field conditions were absolutely horrible and he decides that he wanted to have Tommy Maddox pass the ball close to 40 times.......when the couple of times Jerome Bettis touched the ball he had some good runs.
Needless to say the Steelers lost the game and were shut-out in the process.

[clevestinks]

Please don`t bring MM back! Please! I think we need to promote from within. Somebody who has been with Ben for his two seasons!

[BB2W]

I wouldn't want Mularkey back. I never cared for his offense... it basically revolved around gimic plays.

[Prosdo]

Originally Posted by BB2W

I wouldn't want Mularkey back. I never cared for his offense... it basically revolved around gimic plays.

I second that!