|
|
Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums? • Intelligent and friendly discussions. • It's free and it's quick. Always. • Enter events in the forums calendar. • Very user friendly software. • Exclusive contests and giveaways. |
|
Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here |
Our 2013 Goal: $400.00 - To Date: $00.00 (00.00%) |
| Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact |
|
|||||||

Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#11 | |
|
Water Boy
![]() Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3
Member Number: 16327
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
For a formal treaty, you are right.. but the president can speak on issues and all but commit us to a course of action simply by his words. I think the specific wording of this amendment would assure that NO ONE but congress can make any agreements dealing with US currency. I do like it, but think more thought should be put into it. Otherwise, I am afraid an active court may get into it later on and establish a different reading of the presidents power to make treaties based on this amendment's bad wording.... |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|