Does Obama "Hate White People? Native Americans"?

[HAWK]

I called you names? Not sure how you got there.

And I did address your points.

Show me where I didn't.

[HAWK]

You said:

Originally Posted by GBMelBlount

So what is there to learn from this Hawk? Assume all intelligence is misinformation and sit around with your head up your ass and do nothing?

Again, your logic is dizzying.

I replied:

How about we demand better from our elected officials? Maybe we should actually demand the results they promised while campaigning? I voted for Bush both times and am still waiting for several of his campaign promises. You're objecting because it's "your side" (i.e. Bush) that invaded Iraq. If it had been Clinton or even Obama you'd be lining up to agree with me.

I'm a Centrist/Independent that, like I said, voted for Bush both times. So stop with the bipartisan BS and look at it from a human perspective and not how you're told to by your political party.

If demanding more means my argument is weak...then so be it.

I think I answered your question of whether we should just sit on our asses.

[tony hipchest]

Originally Posted by GBMelBlount

You just attacked me as a BS partisan and changed the subject as opposed to discussing the validity of my points. And why does matter if your a centrist? Does it make your points more valid?

Labeling, name calling and deflection.

Nice.

you labeled him as one with an agenda. hes probably already sniffed you out as one of the biggest labelers and name callers on the board, and you are the one deflecting. "nice" = failed

Originally Posted by HAWK

I called you names? Not sure how you got there.

And I did address your points.

Show me where I didn't.

he cant and he wont.

NO = EXPOSED! (yet again)

[HAWK]

He is wrapped in irony. Just a few posts ago he told me I had an agenda and then points his finger at me for allegedly implying he has one.

Hypocrite?

[GBMelBlount]

OK, so let's say this is your response.

Originally Posted by HAWK

How about we demand better from our elected officials? Maybe we should actually demand the results they promised while campaigning? I voted for Bush both times and am still waiting for several of his campaign promises. You're objecting because it's "your side" (i.e. Bush) that invaded Iraq. If it had been Clinton or even Obama you'd be lining up to agree with me.

Fair enough. You're still waiting for Bush to follow through on some campaign promises.

Now, let me ask you, being that you are an open minded centrist....do you feel that Bush went against more campaign promises in 8 (2,500+ days)years than Obama has in 100 days? Possibly not.

So my point is, you are implying I am partisan in my points and yet everything you have brought up on this Obama thread bashes Bush.......do you see the absurdity of your continuous one-sided Bush bashing makes you appear?

[GBMelBlount]

Originally Posted by tony hipchest

you labeled him as one with an agenda. hes probably already sniffed you out as one of the biggest labelers and name callers on the board, and you are the one deflecting. "nice" = failed

he cant and he wont.

NO = EXPOSED! (yet again)

You know tony, I was feeling sorry for when you started whining about people taking your literally etc. I don't any more. You are a flame baiter and a deflector as many of the others on the board have stated. As Preacher has stated, it is sad to see what has become of you.

[tony hipchest]

Originally Posted by HAWK

He is wrapped in irony. Just a few posts ago he told me I had an agenda and then points his finger at me for allegedly implying he has one.

Hypocrite?

and its pretty much clear as day you didnt call him a bullshit partisan. you were clearly addressing the tone of the post you addressed.

so he deflects by twisting your words and tries to stick you with a label to diminish anything you might say. its a tired and old tactic.

NO = EXPOSED!

oh, and MILF!!!

[tony hipchest]

Originally Posted by GBMelBlount

You are a flame baiter and a deflector as many of the others on the board have stated. As Preacher has stated, it is sad to see what has become of you.

:crying: need a tissue?

"sticks and stones may break my bones...."

name calling... "nice"

= EXPOSED!

[HAWK]

Originally Posted by GBMelBlount

OK, so let's say this is your response.



Fair enough. You're still waiting for Bush to follow through on some campaign promises.

Now, let me ask you, being that you are an open minded centrist....do you feel that Bush went against more campaign promises in 8 (2,500+ days)years than Obama has in 100 days? Possibly not.

So my point is, you are implying I am partisan in my points and yet everything you have brought up on this Obama thread bashes Bush.......do you see the absurdity of your continuous one-sided Bush bashing makes you appear?

I've not defended Obama. I have pointed out the irony of everyone's Chicken Little imitation of how the sky's falling and it's Obama's fault when this has been coming for a long time. The first 2-3 years of Bush's admin was fine. But then it went down hill. My point is, and always has been, it takes a little more than 100 days to cure the country's cancer. If eight years from now we are the same or worse then I will forsake him as I forsook Bush. Isn't that fair enough?

[GBMelBlount]

Originally Posted by tony hipchest

and its pretty much clear as day you didnt call him a bullshit partisan. you were clearly addressing the tone of the post you addressed.

so he deflects by twisting your words and tries to stick you with a label to diminish anything you might say. its a tired and old tactic.

NO = EXPOSED!

oh, and MILF!!!

Originally Posted by HAWK View Post

I'm a Centrist/Independent that, like I said, voted for Bush both times. So stop with the bipartisan BS and look at it from a human perspective and not how you're told to by your political party.

If demanding more means my argument is weak...then so be it.

Here you go Tony. I already highlighted this earlier. Please try to focus on the issues that are being discussed OK? As I said, HAWK is the one that got off topic and you are further doing that.