Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
 • Intelligent and friendly discussions.
 • It's free and it's quick. Always.
 • Enter events in the forums calendar.
 • Very user friendly software.
 • Exclusive contests and giveaways.

 Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
 Our 2014 Goal: $450.00 - To Date: $450.00 (100.00%)
 Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact Pittsburgh Steelers Forum Feed Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.

Go Back   Steelers Fever Forums > Steelers Football > Pittsburgh Steelers


Steelers Fever Fan Shop

Doc's Sports Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.

Steelers

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-10-2009, 07:41 PM   #1
mesaSteeler
A Son of Martha
Supporter
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 7,976
Gender: Male
Member Number: 10438
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Big Ben superior to Eli in every way

Big Ben' superior to Eli in every way

July 10, 2009 1:32 PM
http://myespn.go.com/blogs/afcnorth
Posted by ESPN.com's James Walker

Matt Mosley and the NFC East deal mostly in hype.

In the AFC North, current home of the Lombardi trophy, we deal in reality.

And the reality is New York Giants quarterback Eli Manning doesn't stack up to Ben Roethlisberger of the Pittsburgh Steelers in any way, shape or form.

While Mosley is begging his readers for help to defend Manning, I will present my case for "Big Ben."

For warm-up purposes, let's start with statistics.

Roethlisberger has a higher completion percentage (62.4 to Manning's 55.9), more touchdowns (101 to 98), fewer interceptions (69 to 74), more victories (51 to 42) and a much better career passer rating (89.4 to 76.1) than Manning.

Did I mention Roethlisberger (two) has twice as many championships? You're going to need the entire Manning household (two) to equal Roethlisberger (two) in that category.

Both quarterbacks were taken in the 2004 draft and Roethlisberger got off to a much faster start.

How quickly Mosley and NFC East followers forget Manning was nearly run out of New York during his first few seasons. He lost six of his first seven starts as a rookie and had just one winning season in his first three years.

Now Mosley suddenly thinks the younger Manning deserves to be the highest-paid player in the league with a $120 million contract and an unprecedented $50 million guaranteed.

Manning's highest touchdown total for a season is just 24, yet he deserves the most money? Chalk it up to more NFC East hype.

Dealing in facts, Roethlisberger won 15 games as a rookie, including playoffs, and won his first Super Bowl in his second season. By the way, the Steelers already gave Roethlisberger a $100-plus million contract, because they knew early that Roethlisberger was the real deal. I find it interesting that the Giants haven't displayed the same level of confidence up to this point in their franchise quarterback.

Speaking of the Giants, let's discuss the Plaxico Burress factor.

Burress leaves the Steelers and Roethlisberger becomes an even better player, winning a pair of Super Bowls, including one immediately after Burress bolts Pittsburgh in 2005.

Burress exits New York and the sky falls on Manning and he's never the same quarterback.

It's the same top-flight receiver. It's two quarterbacks put in a similar scenario. Yet Roethlisberger thrives and Manning crumbles. The "Plax factor" cannot be ignored in this debate.

In fact, Manning would've never won his lone Super Bowl title without Burress. Roethlisberger is doing just fine without him.

And forget the argument that Manning does more with less. It's a farce.

Manning has the best offensive line in football and had two 1,000-yard rushers last season in Brandon Jacobs and former Giant Derrick Ward. Elite protection and an elite running game; what more can a quarterback want?

Meanwhile, Roethlisberger has one of the NFL's worst offensive lines and no 1,000-yard rusher in 2008, yet found a way to win Super Bowl XLIII. If you gave Roethlisberger the best offensive line in football and two 1,000-yard rushers, there is no telling the damage the Steelers could do.

In terms of clutch, Manning had one clutch moment while Roethlisberger has already put together a clutch career. The Steelers have never had a losing season with Roethlisberger and he is 8-2 in his career during the playoffs.

Manning is just 4-3 in the playoffs. If you take away his Super Bowl run following the 2007 season, Manning is 0-3 in the postseason.

So who would you want under center in a must-win game: Roethlisberger or Manning?

(Update: Here is Mosley's weak rebuttal in the NFC East blog.)

Blogger Smackdown: Eli vs. Big Ben

July 10, 2009 2:54 PM

Posted by ESPN.com's Matt Mosley

Every now and then, I'm reminded that the NFL created seven other divisions as sort of a neat diversion from the NFC East. Mostly this happens when AFC North blogger James Walker is looking to pad his stats by making unprovoked taunts toward unsuspecting players such as Tony Romo and Eli Manning.

The other day, I made an off-hand remark (imagine that) in a blog entry that I could make the argument that Manning was indeed a better quarterback than Ben Roethlisberger. Of course, that was before I looked at all the data suggesting that I was completely nuts to make that statement. James and his hearty audience took exception to my remark -- and challenged the Beast to an Eli vs. Big Ben throwdown.

Here's what the young Walker had to say on behalf of Big Ben: (Just a repeat of what is a above. Rest of his reply is below - mesa)

Mosley's response: Honestly I felt like James had me on the ropes right up until the time he said, "if you take away [Manning's] Super Bowl run following the 2007 season, Manning is 0-3 in the postseason."

Is that one of the most misguided closing arguments in the history of blogging debates or am I being too harsh? For the sake of this argument, I'm hoping James will allow Manning to retain the crowning achievement of his career. What Manning did in the 2007 playoffs -- especially in the Super Bowl -- redefined him as a quarterback in this league. And by the way, Big Ben would be 0-2 in the playoffs if we took those eight wins away. OK, this is a classic misdirection play that I'm involved in right now, so I'll move away from James' closing argument.

Truth be told, James has a lot more ammunition in terms of numbers, including the two Super Bowl rings that Big Ben's wearing. But seriously, shouldn't you only get a pinky ring when you have a 22.6 passer rating in your first Super Bowl and depend heavily on some very questionable calls to beat the Seahawks? No?

Walker points out Big Ben's quick start to his career, but let's not act like the two quarterbacks were on an equal playing field in 2004. The Steelers were loaded on both sides of the ball, and Roethlisberger was basically asked to manage the team. Manning sat on the bench behind a sputtering Kurt Warner and then he was thrown into the fire midway through the season. People will point to Manning having more interceptions, but that's because he was asked to do more than Big Ben early in his career. Roethlisberger has had the benefit of elite defenses and running games throughout most of his career. That hasn't been the case with Manning. In fact, the Giants' defense had actually put up pedestrian numbers in 2007 before they became a force during the Super Bowl run.

As I pointed out in a recent mailbag, Roethlisberger has taken a staggering 192 sacks in his career, while Manning, in virtually the same amount of games, has taken 120. Big Ben's defenders will point to the fact that he's more mobile than Manning -- and they'll be right. But he still holds onto the ball too long, which puts his offense in tough spots. I love that everyone always refers to how great a fourth-quarter quarterback Roethlisberger is. Well, in many cases, his mistakes are what gave him the opportunity to pull off those comebacks.

Oh, and there's the fact that Roethlisberger pads his stats against the dregs of the AFC North. With a couple of exceptions, the Bengals and Browns have been brutal during Roethlisberger's time in the league. And it's not like their best competition, the Ravens, have been a juggernaut. Since 2004, the Ravens have had seasons of 9-7, 6-10 and 5-11.

Give Manning a crack at those same teams every season, and his numbers would be dramatically different. He came along when the Eagles were a dominant team and the Cowboys and Redskins are much stronger than anything the Bengals and Browns were putting on the field. Yes, I know the Bengals (and even the Browns) had a good season apiece, so don't try to get me on a technicality.

And one more thing: The whole Burress argument was completely unfair. He wasn't the truly elite receiver in Pittsburgh that he became with the Giants. So of course Big Ben's not going to miss him as much as Manning did. And Roethlisberger had an entire offseason to adjust to life without Burress. It happended to Manning overnight.

The only other thing I can think of right now is that Manning handled both the Steelers and Ravens in '08. James, you came out swinging as always -- but you left yourself exposed on several fronts. My winning argument today has to be one of the biggest upsets since Tyson-Douglas. All my best.

Beast Mgt.

Ben Roethlisberger, Eli Manning, New York Giants, Plaxico Burress
mesaSteeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2009, 08:08 PM   #2
Texasteel
Living Legend
Supporter
 
Texasteel's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 3,638
Gender: Male
Member Number: 8323
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Big Ben' superior to Eli in every way

Didn't everyone already know that?

Very nice article mesa. Thank You.
__________________


Simply, The Chief.
Texasteel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2009, 08:31 PM   #3
klick81
Team Owner
Supporter
 
klick81's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,683
Member Number: 1396
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Big Ben superior to Eli in every way

Umm...I don't even need to read this long ass article to know that. But i'll read it anyway :).
__________________
Ward, after being fined by Goodell on a play that was not penalized:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hines Ward
What are you going to say, I was too rough?
klick81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2009, 11:10 PM   #4
NEPAsteeler
Assistant Coach
 

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,286
Member Number: 11528
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Big Ben superior to Eli in every way

Quote:
Originally Posted by mesaSteeler View Post
Big Ben' superior to Eli in every way

July 10, 2009 1:32 PM
http://myespn.go.com/blogs/afcnorth
Posted by ESPN.com's James Walker

The only other thing I can think of right now is that Manning handled both the Steelers and Ravens in '08.

Beast Mgt.

Ben Roethlisberger, Eli Manning, New York Giants, Plaxico Burress
Too bad the Giants beat us because of a fluke play at the end of the game.

And Eli didn't exactly "light up the boards" in either game. Like was mentioned in the article, it's a little easier when you have a top notch O-line in front of you.

I'll gladly take Big Ben over Eli Manning anyday.
NEPAsteeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2009, 11:46 PM   #5
SC Steeler Steve
Bench Warmer
Supporter
 
SC Steeler Steve's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Anderson, SC
Posts: 251
Gender: Male
Member Number: 12276
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Big Ben superior to Eli in every way

I know there is no way under Gods green earth I would trade Big Ben for EITHER Manning.....

Hell for that matter give me Phillip Rivers over Ellie Mae...
__________________
Pittsburgh Steelers, Atlanta Braves, Clemson Tigers
SC Steeler Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 03:49 AM   #6
JackHammer
Assistant Coach
 
JackHammer's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The Steel Valley
Posts: 1,017
Gender: Male
Member Number: 5640
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Big Ben superior to Eli in every way

I can hear Mercury Morris now:

Quote:
......don't call me when you're in my town, call me when you're on my block, and I see you next door moving your furniture in.
Eli isn't even in Ben's town
JackHammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 07:48 AM   #7
Galax Steeler
The Virginia Hillbilly
Supporter
 
Galax Steeler's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Galax Va
Posts: 105,145
Gender: Male
Member Number: 3287
Thanks: 1,381
Thanked 3,908 Times in 1,639 Posts
My Mood: Lurking
Default Re: Big Ben superior to Eli in every way

There is no comparison I would take Ben anyday of the week over that little I don't want to play for the Chargers crybaby Eli.
__________________
Galax Steeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 10:04 AM   #8
fansince'76
Living Legend
Supporter
 

Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 17,656
Member Number: 1984
Thanks: 286
Thanked 1,391 Times in 506 Posts
Default Re: Big Ben superior to Eli in every way

Quote:
The only other thing I can think of right now is that Manning handled both the Steelers and Ravens in '08.
Sorry, but Manning didn't "handle" shit that day. We lost that game because we had a long TD pass by Ben called back due to a boneheaded holding penalty against Colon and Harrison being forced into action as a long snapper due to a fluky injury to Greg Warren and snapping the damn ball out of the back of the end zone.
fansince'76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 10:20 AM   #9
Men of Steel
Team Captain
 
Men of Steel's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: OKLAHOMA
Posts: 689
Gender: Male
Member Number: 13746
Thanks: 1,512
Thanked 393 Times in 163 Posts
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: Big Ben superior to Eli in every way

my respects to Eli... i mean... he doesnt suck.....

but he is not better than BEN.

case closed.
__________________
Men of Steel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2009, 11:14 AM   #10
scsteeler
Team Captain
 
scsteeler's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Rock Hill SC
Posts: 861
Member Number: 8491
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Big Ben superior to Eli in every way

HTML Code:
Oh, and there's the fact that Roethlisberger pads his stats against the dregs of the AFC North. With a couple of exceptions, the Bengals and Browns have been brutal during Roethlisberger's time in the league. And it's not like their best competition, the Ravens, have been a juggernaut. Since 2004, the Ravens have had seasons of 9-7, 6-10 and 5-11.

Give Manning a crack at those same teams every season, and his numbers would be dramatically different. He came along when the Eagles were a dominant team and the Cowboys and Redskins are much stronger than anything the Bengals and Browns were putting on the field. Yes, I know the Bengals (and even the Browns) had a good season apiece, so don't try to get me on a technicality.
If you look at last season those teams that he says makes Ben look good the Browns and Bengals both did a number on the Giants last year.

Browns Kicked their Ass 34-15 in 2008 and they luckily won in OT against the Bengals 26-23 so I don't think Eli would be any better playing these teams twice a year. The fact of the matter is the Steelers have made it their job to win their division each year which gets you in the playoffs. Eli is a good QB but not better than Ben!
scsteeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum
no new posts