Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
• Intelligent and friendly discussions.
• It's free and it's quick. Always.
• Enter events in the forums calendar.
• Very user friendly software.
• Exclusive contests and giveaways.
Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
Our 2013 Goal: $400.00 - To Date: $00.00 (00.00%)
|Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact||Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.|
|11-25-2009, 09:57 PM||#1|
IRONMAN a.k.a. Tony Stark
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Give me back my game...
Member Number: 658
Thanked 4,537 Times in 1,959 Posts
Success has followed teams moving away from the pass to the run
nothing really new here. its an old proven method for success.
as we get into winter, having a running game that can be leaned on is a valuable commodity. the steelers have really ratcheted up their passing attempts in the past 2 weeks (vs. the more dominant opponents they faced the previous 2). it is apparent they follow this trend stated below.
i dont think anyone who has suggested they run more is saying 35 runs vs 19 passes, but moving away from the 75% pass/66% pass is a step in the right direction. 4-5 more runs a game can make a world of difference.
and its much easier to make a slight tweak to a good offensive coordinators philosophy midseason, than it is to revamp an entire special teams unit. just like a great defense, masked our offensive line woes last year, a great offense this year can mask the special teams stink and lack of troy.
making these adjustments and staying ahead of the trends falls squarely on the shoulders of the head coach and coordinators. anyone who thinks the coaches dont study these numbers and trends, and gameplan off of what they learn is kidding themselves.
|11-26-2009, 12:22 AM||#2|
Quest For Seven
Join Date: Oct 2006
Member Number: 3236
Thanked 2,794 Times in 1,136 Posts
Re: Success has followed teams moving away from the pass to the run
What are you talking about the only thing that matters is execution.
|Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)|