Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
 • Intelligent and friendly discussions.
 • It's free and it's quick. Always.
 • Enter events in the forums calendar.
 • Very user friendly software.
 • Exclusive contests and giveaways.

 Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
 Our 2014 Goal: $450.00 - To Date: $450.00 (100.00%)
 Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact Pittsburgh Steelers Forum Feed Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.

Go Back   Steelers Fever Forums > General Football > NFL Football

Steelers Fever Fan Shop

Doc's Sports Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.

Pro Bowl
8:00PM Eastern on ESPN

Thread Tools
Old 01-30-2006, 08:48 PM   #1
Living Legend
CantStop85's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 3,140
Gender: Male
Member Number: 486
Thanks: 0
Thanked 21 Times in 7 Posts
Default Superbowl XL--Anticlimax?

Article from ESPN:
By Skip Bayless
Page 2

DETROIT -- I'm writing this as I travel to my 31st consecutive Super Bowl.

This has always been my second favorite sports event -- The Masters wins by a single blade of Augusta National grass. But this year, the Super Bowl is beginning to feel like the Indy 500 without Danica.

Related Stories
? Klosterman: Super Bowl blog
? Gallo: If I were at media day ...
? Murphy: Hidden Super story lines
? Complete Super Bowl XL coverage

Super Bowl XL is anything but Extra Large. For most fans who aren't Seahawks or Steelers fans, this matchup seems like it should be returned and exchanged.

If you love your Seahawks or your Steelers, please quit reading now. This isn't for you. This is for everyone else out there who is trying -- and trying -- to get excited about the NFL's showcase game. I sense less buzz about this Super Bowl than any I've attended. If any Roman-numeral game has ever deserved only one week of buildup, it was this one.

Super Bowl life ends at 40?

While Seahawks fans are sleepless in Seattle, media members are sleepy in Detroit. Somehow, the Seahawks and Steelers in Detroit seems like a consolation game. After three sensational weekends of playoffs, this is an anticlimax. Now we're paying the price for all those upsets.

How can these teams ever generate enough star power to live up to the telecast's Oscar-worthy commercials?

No Peyton or Brady or Vick or buzz.

No rivalry or bad blood or controversy or buzz.

Only zzz.

These Super Bowl highlights shouldn't be immortalized by the towering tones of John Facenda. Shelley Duval should narrate: "Once upon a time, there were two teams..."

The problem here is that, for the first time, the Super Bowl features two underdogs, two Cinderellas, two teams that came from nowhere on destiny-kissed rolls. One underdog can make for a can't-put-it-down script -- see some kid named Brady vs. Kurt Warner's "unstoppable" St. Louis Rams four years ago. But though this year's point spread is Pittsburgh by 4?, this feels like a game without a favorite.

The Steelers, the first sixth seed to make it to the Super Bowl, barely made the playoffs thanks to a fairly easy closing schedule. They beat Kyle Orton's Bears in a snowstorm in Pittsburgh, then took care of Minnesota, Cleveland and Detroit.

But would they have won their first playoff game, in Cincinnati, if Bengals quarterback Carson Palmer hadn't been hurt on his second play? Doubtful. Would they have finished off the season's most shocking upset, in Indianapolis, if Colts cornerback Nick Harper hadn't weaved back into a sprawling ankle tackle by Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger? No. Would the Steelers have been able to win in Foxborough if the Broncos hadn't upset the Patriots the week before in Denver? Highly doubtful. Would the Steelers have won in Denver if an early poor pass by Roethlisberger had been picked off in the flat by Champ Bailey and returned for a stadium-rocking touchdown? Probably not.

And now the AFC's sixth seed is favored over the NFC's top seed? This feels like a moderately interesting, Week 9 nonconference game.

Would the Seahawks have risen from 2-2 to home-field playoff advantage if Terrell Owens hadn't torn apart the Eagles? If Michael Vick hadn't regressed? If the Giants, Redskins and Cowboys hadn't been forced to do battle twice in the East and the Panthers, Bucs and Falcons hadn't beaten each other up in the South?

Things just kept breaking right for the Seahawks. Without bye weeks, the Redskins and Panthers were banged up before playoff games in Seattle -- where the Seahawks' 12th Man gives them the NFL's loudest and strongest home-field advantage.

Now we should write odes to a team whose MVP just might have been its fans? Who won't be much of a factor in Detroit?

A year ago, we had enough subplots to last us three weeks. We had the Belichick-Brady dynasty vs. the T.O.-McNabb Eagles. Would Owens' ankle and fibula miraculously heal in time for the game? Would Patriots enforcer Rodney Harrison separate Freddie Mitchell's head from his body after FredEx couldn't even remember his name?

I can't believe I'm writing this, but I'm starting to miss T.O.

This is a game without an established superstar -- unless you count Seattle left tackle Walter Jones, the lone cinch Hall of Famer. Pittsburgh's Jerome Bettis is not -- not after never leading his league in rushing and never having transcendent postseason impact. Bettis, a six-time Pro Bowl player, has been very good. Not great.

Bettis' returning to his hometown to play in his first Super Bowl in what probably is his final game is a nice story. But that doesn't make him Jim Brown or Walter Payton or O.J. Simpson or Emmitt Smith.

As much as I respect the Rooney family, I couldn't help chuckling the other day when Steelers owner Dan Rooney compared this team to the Terry Bradshaw team that won its first of four Super Bowls. Come on. That team had nine future Hall of Famers -- Bradshaw at that point being the least likely candidate.

Best case, this Steelers team has three candidates -- Bettis, Roethlisberger and Troy Polamalu.

Roethlisberger has the best chance of becoming this game's breakout Madison Avenue star. But as good as he is in his second season, it's laughable to hear angle-starved commentators already reaching to compare him with a young Marino or Elway. Calm down. Roethlisberger doesn't have Marino's trigger or Elway's mobility or either one's velocity. First let's see if Big Ben can beat the Seahawks.

Strictly from a football standpoint, this matchup is pretty intriguing. You have two pretty good, very hot teams that didn't play each other. Will the Seahawks be able to stand up to the spotlight and play as fast and furiously as they did at home? Will the "new" Steelers continue to be pass-first?

Whoops, another puncture in our Super Bowl balloon. The black-jerseyed, mud-and-blood Steelers often abandoned their running game early in their playoff road wins and opened up the offense and even resorted to trick plays. Though they're the Super Bowl home team, they've chosen to wear their white road jerseys. Now we don't even have a vaunted bully.

We have two very likable teams and coaches. We have Steelers coach Bill Cowher doing what a desperate, couldn't-win-the-big-one Mack Brown did at Texas -- backing off, loosening up, letting his young quarterback throw the ball. We have Seahawks coach Mike Holmgren, slipping off an early-season hot seat and now admitting he was beginning to doubt his ability.

You can't wait for Sunday, can you.

That's why I'm rooting for Steelers linebacker Joey Porter. Not in Sunday's game, but during Tuesday's media day. Porter is the only player on either team whose mouth is big enough to launch this game back into watercooler America's consciousness.

Please, Joey, say: "It's hard to get excited about playing the Seahawks. They wouldn't have made the playoffs in the AFC."

Please say: "Matt Hasselbeck has a lot of Jake Plummer in him. He rattles in big games."

Please say: "I guarantee we'll win by three touchdowns."

You're our only hope, Joey. Don't let us down.

Skip Bayless can be seen Monday through Friday on "Cold Pizza," ESPN2's morning show, and at 4 p.m. ET on ESPN's "1st & 10." His column appears twice a week on Page 2. You can e-mail Skip here.
CantStop85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2006, 01:20 AM   #2
Livinginthe past
Living Legend
Livinginthe past's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Crushing the AFCE...annually
Posts: 7,520
Member Number: 478
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Superbowl XL--Anticlimax?

Skip Bayless is a well renowned douchebag columnist.

Anyone could do what he does - put a negative spin on just about every aspect of the upcoming Superbowl - in a mostly factless, pointless fashion.

I guess it somehow improves his standing with his editor if he gets lots of emails (most of which will be well deserved abuse) - and helps keep him in a job.

He, and others like him, wrote similar columns about the Pats going to the SB - either they were useless no-hopers (2001) or they were just an 'ok team with no interesting individuals' (2003/04)

As far as I'm concerned this is not the ideal SB for one reason - the Patriots aren't in it!

Apart from that you couldnt ask for much more - two very deserving teams who are at the tops of their games slugging it out.

Bring it on

They've been great for a while now, three Super Bowls' worth of great. But only this season have the New England Patriots become The Show, the must-see team of stars, pretty boys and reformed bad boys. Suddenly, the Patriots are not simply great; they're compelling, fascinating, appearing to be almighty and a touch lawless.
The Patriots didn't bother with swagger to start this NFL season; they went straight to defiant. Either you're one of them or you're about to get crushed.
Livinginthe past is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2006, 04:31 AM   #3
Prosdo's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 4,326
Gender: Female
Member Number: 86
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Superbowl XL--Anticlimax?

The first line said it all Skip Bayless no need to read on from there.
Prosdo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2006, 08:35 AM   #4

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,467
Member Number: 342
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Superbowl XL--Anticlimax?

Good article, dead on. In fact "anticlimax" would be a compliment.
hardwork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 11:33 AM   #5
Water Boy

Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 22
Member Number: 1148
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Superbowl XL--Anticlimax?

In 1975, if someone would have said the Steelers had 9 hall of fame candidates, people would have laughed too. It was a team with a lot of very good, young players. No one realized how good that team was until years later. Will this team have 9 hall of famers? who knows? But I know they're fun to watch. :-)
bmovierat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 12:17 PM   #6
Team Captain

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 990
Member Number: 520
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Superbowl XL--Anticlimax?

this probably isn't true for everyone, but it is for me...in the article he mentioned how the only people excited for this Super Bowl are Pittsburgh and Seattle fans. in other years when the Steelers aren't playing in the SB I don't get excited. I watch it and always have a team I root for, but it's not exciting for me
It's Miller time!
melroseplace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 12:27 PM   #7
SteelerDan43's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: From Pittsburgh, currently going to school in Rochester
Posts: 1,157
Gender: Male
Member Number: 811
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Superbowl XL--Anticlimax?

I also watch every superbowl but they are not nearly as exciting... Like last year I rooted for the Eagles just because I have a few friends from Philly and my hate for the Pats but I wasnt wrecked when they lost...
SteelerDan43 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 07:23 PM   #8
Team Captain
WWIIOwheelz's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 707
Member Number: 1323
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Superbowl XL--Anticlimax?

Oh, the HORROR! We might actually have two teams who are more concerned about playing football than acting like feuding sorority houses! It's not the fault of a disciplined football team to be respectful of their opponents in a world championship game--- it's the result of good coaching.

Just because Pittsburgh doesn't sign egocentric idiots who spout off about things they can't comprehend, then are subsequently laughed about in the media shouldn't take away from the very real football game we have ahead. Perhaps covering football isn't enough for this modern media? Maybe they now lack the sports knowledge to make interesting, informed commentary about the matchups that really matter.

I've long joked about the pathetic writers who try to stir up totally irrelevant subject matter instead of just covering the !@#$ing GAME. Makes you wonder how some of those people ever got hired to cover sports. Mike Celzig at MSNBC is one of the worst sports writers I've ever read in my life, as an example. You can almost tell which days the guy forgets to take his bipolar meds.
WWIIOwheelz is offline   Reply With Quote


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2015 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2015 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum
no new posts