Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
 • Intelligent and friendly discussions.
 • It's free and it's quick. Always.
 • Enter events in the forums calendar.
 • Very user friendly software.
 • Exclusive contests and giveaways.

 Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
 Our 2014 Goal: $450.00 - To Date: $450.00 (100.00%)
 Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact Pittsburgh Steelers Forum Feed Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.

Go Back   Steelers Fever Forums > Steelers Football > Pittsburgh Steelers


Steelers Fever Fan Shop

Doc's Sports Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.

Steelers

LOL

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-14-2010, 09:05 PM   #1
mesaSteeler
A Son of Martha
Supporter
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 7,976
Gender: Male
Member Number: 10438
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Wilfork among UFAs who could be franchised

(Mods, feel free if you want to move this to the NLF forum but since we may have to franchise either Reed or Hampton I decided to post it here since this seems to be a good write up about how much it will cost us to use the tag. - mesa)

Wilfork among UFAs who could be 'franchised'
http://www.profootballweekly.com/201...-be-franchised

Posted Feb. 14, 2010 @ 12:08 p.m.
By Mike Wilkening

With free agency around the corner — and the very real prospect of the 2010 league year beginning without a salary cap — this edition of the NFList takes a closer look at players who could receive the franchise or transition tag.

Free agents can receive either the so-called "exclusive" or "non-exclusive" franchise tags. A free agent receiving the "non-exclusive" tag must be tendered a one-year contract that is the greater of (1) 120 percent of his previous year's salary or (2) the average of the top five salaries at the position at which he played the most games in the previous league year. Also, the free agent receiving the tag can negotiate with other teams, but his team can match an offer from another club; should it decline, it will receive two first-round picks as compensation.

The "exclusive" tag bars a free agent from negotiating with other teams. It guarantees a free agent a one-year contract the greater of (1) the average of the top five salaries at his position as of the end of restricted free agency in 2010 or (2) either of the criteria listed above for a non-exclusive tag.

In a year with a salary cap, teams can exercise one franchise or one transition tag, the latter of which also requires a one-year tender offer but at a lower salary than a franchise player. A player who receives the transition tag can sign an offer sheet elsewhere, but his current team has the right of first refusal.

However, in an uncapped year, teams can use an additional transition tag. Most importantly, an uncapped year would require players to have six accrued seasons to become unrestricted free agents, a development that would reduce the number of players who could garner the franchise tag.

Here are the franchise and transition numbers for each position, along with a list of players who could receive the franchise or transition tag as determined by the PFW staff. Players who would be restricted free agents in an uncapped year but unrestricted free agents in a capped year are denoted with an asterisk. (Positions are listed in descending order from highest franchise tender to lowest):


QUARTERBACK

Tenders: $16.405 million (franchise); $14.546 million (transition).
Franchise-tag candidates: None. Teams usually lock up promising QBs early.

DEFENSIVE END

Tenders: $12.398 million; $10.193 million.
Franchise-tag candidate: Raiders DE Richard Seymour. Oakland traded a first-round draft pick for Seymour and doesn't want to lose him after one season.

OFFENSIVE LINE

Tenders: $10.731 million; $9.142 million.
Franchise-tag candidates: Steelers OT Willie Colon*, Saints OG Jahri Evans*, ­Chargers OT Marcus McNeill.*
Skinny: Young tackles are at a premium.

LINEBACKER

Tenders: $9.680 million; $8.373 million.
Franchise-tag candidates: Colts MLB Gary Brackett, Broncos OLB Elvis Dumervil*, Chargers OLB Shawne Merriman*, ­Buccaneers MLB Barrett Ruud*, Texans ­ MLB DeMeco Ryans*.
Skinny: In a capped year, the market for LBs would be robust.

CORNERBACK

Tenders: $9.566 million; $8.056 million.
Franchise-tag candidate: Texans CB Dunta Robinson. Robinson received the franchise tag last year and could get it again in an uncapped year.

WIDE RECEIVER

Tenders: $9.521 million; $8.651 million.
Franchise-tag candidates: Chargers WR Vincent Jackson*, Broncos WR Brandon Marshall.*
Skinny: Both are No. 1-caliber receivers.

RUNNING BACK

Tenders: $8.156 million; $7.151 million.
Franchise-tag candidates: None. Teams seeking starting RBs will have to look hardest in the draft, not free agency.

DEFENSIVE TACKLE

Tenders: $7.003 million; $6.353 million.
Franchise-tag candidates: Titans DT Tony Brown*, Steelers NT Casey Hampton, 49ers NT Aubrayo Franklin, Patriots NT Vince Wilfork.
Skinny: Wilfork is one of the NFL's top interior linemen. Hampton and Franklin could be coveted by teams employing the 3-4.

SAFETY

Tenders: $6.455 million; $6.011 million.
Franchise-tag candidates: Rams S O.J. Atogwe*, Colts S Antoine Bethea*, Packers S Nick Collins*.
Skinny: All three safeties are ballhawks.

TIGHT END

Tenders: $5.908 million; $5.248 million.
Franchise-tag candidate: Texans TE Owen Daniels*. He comes off a season-ending knee injury but is a force when healthy.

PUNTER/PLACEKICKER

Tenders: $2.814 million; $2.629 million.
Franchise-tag candidates: Falcons P Michael Koenen*, Raiders PK Sebastian Janikowski, Steelers PK Jeff Reed.
Skinny: The low franchise number makes using the tag attractive to some clubs.
mesaSteeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2010, 09:39 PM   #2
MasterOfPuppets
Living Legend
Supporter
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,368
Gender: Male
Member Number: 1990
Thanks: 944
Thanked 4,113 Times in 1,744 Posts
Default Re: Wilfork among UFAs who could be franchised

why do they lump all the offensive linemen in one catagory, but they differentiat between DE's and DT's ? i mean there's a big diff between LT contracts and center contracts...
__________________
“If tyranny and oppression come to this land it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.” ― James Madison

"When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty." - Thomas Jefferson

"The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first." -Thomas Jefferson

"The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers." - Thomas Jefferson

MasterOfPuppets is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2010, 10:05 PM   #3
Steely McSmash
Team Captain
 
Steely McSmash's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Malden, MA (from the South Hills)
Posts: 781
Member Number: 8814
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Wilfork among UFAs who could be franchised

Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets View Post
why do they lump all the offensive linemen in one catagory, but they differentiat between DE's and DT's ? i mean there's a big diff between LT contracts and center contracts...

I think there's probably more position flexibility on OL so that may have something to do with it. I guess probably not too many guards get tagged.
__________________
Steely McSmash is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum
no new posts