Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
 • Intelligent and friendly discussions.
 • It's free and it's quick. Always.
 • Enter events in the forums calendar.
 • Very user friendly software.
 • Exclusive contests and giveaways.

 Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
 Our 2013 Goal: $400.00 - To Date: $00.00 (00.00%)
 Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact Pittsburgh Steelers Forum Feed Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.

Go Back   Steelers Fever Forums > General Football > NFL Football


Steelers Fever Fan Shop

Doc's Sports Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.

Steelers Steelers - Browns Bills
September 7, 2014, 1:00pmET

CBS
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-25-2010, 06:48 PM   #1
SteelersMongol
Living Legend
Supporter
 
SteelersMongol's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ulaanbaatar, MONGOLIA
Posts: 4,083
Gender: Male
Member Number: 2401
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thumbs up American Football in the Winter Olympics: Pros and Cons

Found a very good article about going international. But not with the way U think.

Quote:
This Mike Florio column at The Sporting News got me thinking about what it would be like if our big, bad beloved game of American football were to bust into the Winter Olympics.

At first, I thought, "I don't really want to see that." The idea even seemed a little perverse. What's to be gained from beating the Jamaican national team 172-0? No good can come from that.

The more thought I gave to it, though, the more that I thought about the upside, the potential benefits and the likelihood that it one day will happen. At the very least, I thought it was worth putting together a list of pros and cons, as I see them. Let's go through it.

Pros:

It benefits the NFL if, down the line, other countries start producing NFL players. You can never have too much talent, right? It would take years and years and years to develop any kind of regular stream of talent to the NFL from outside of North America, but why not try? Why not try for a football version of Dirk Nowitzki? Maybe the payoff is a long way off, but it never happens if you don't take the first step.

There's more football being played internationally than you might think. There's already a World Cup of American Football and an IFAF (International Federation of American Football) out there. The World Cup happens every four years, with Australia, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, South Korea, Sweden and the United States fielding teams. The U.S. only competed in the last one in 2007, which they won by defeating Japan in the title game, 23-20 in overtime.

There are also international 19-and-under competitions, one of which we won last year with beatings of France (78-0), Mexico (55-0) and Canada (41-3). In another 19-and-under game, Team USA just beat a World All-Star team, 17-0.

So there's not a lot of football out there, but there is some. We're not starting totally from scratch.

A televised football game not beholden to commercials would be amazing. Honestly, I can't even picture it. Since high school, I don't think I've ever even seen a game that didn't have regular, lengthy, painful television timeouts. I've enjoyed the Olympic hockey experience, sans timeouts (nice gag job yesterday, Russia), and a football equivalent might blow my mind.

It might make a cool draft evaluation tool. If we're ever going to do it, I say we set it up sort of like the Senior Bowl. There are doubts about how we could get players to play hard and risk injury, but you know what? The Senior Bowl manages it. Invite a bunch of draft prospects and scouts. If the players are being evaluated all week long, based on practices and the game itself, I promise you, they'll go all out. If a gold medal isn't enough motivation, draft stock would be.

If it ever got to the point where we had to use them, it would be great for NFL players. The American hockey team has been widely praised for their scrappy and gritty performance during these games, and rightly so. With that praise, though, it seems like there's an undercurrent of, "NFL players would never play this hard for their country because they only care about money!" I don't think that's fair, and I don't agree, and I think if they ever had the opportunity, they'd be just as patriotic and scrappy as their NHL counterparts.

Cons:

Yes, we will destroy everyone for the next 50 years or so, and that will be no fun. But is that really a good reason not to play a sport? Because one team is really good at it? Everything that's competitive now once was not competitive. If it's ever going to get competitive, it's got to start somewhere. The other countries are just going to have to take their lumps.

Maybe the Olympics are for sports we don't see on a regular basis. I love the Curling. I love the Alpine Skiing. I love the Bobsled. There are spectacular athletes out there who work their whole lives in relative obscurity, and they get their chance at glory once every four years. Maybe we shouldn't do anything that might overshadow that.

Player, spectator and feasibility issues aside, though, I think the most important thing to look at here is just how desperately the NFL wants to extend their global reach. That's what these games in England are all about. Yes, Europe has rejected American football before, but that doesn't mean we're not going to keep trying to stuff it down their throats.

The NFL wants football fans (and their money) from all over the world. Roger Goodell would dance like Chad Ochocinco(notes) if the Olympics helped him to achieve that. Other countries start putting national teams together, and then, maybe a few more kids in China, New Zealand and Russia take up the game. Maybe they get good, one or two get to the NFL, and there's a snowball effect, and all the sudden, Yemen insists that they have the NFL Sunday Ticket package. Win-win.

The IFAF is already on record as saying that they're going to submit an application to the International Olympic Committee sometime in 2011. I don't know if that will work, but eventually -- and we might be talking 20 years or more here -- I think you'll see the NFL get behind the idea, even if they aren't participating directly, and make a real push for football in the Winter Olympics.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shu...urn=nfl,224072
__________________
SteelersMongol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2010, 10:48 AM   #2
WH
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Member Number:
Default Re: American Football in the Winter Olympics: Pros and Cons

Germany would LOVE that oppurtunity.

Still, the game is too slow paced for casual watchers in this country.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2010, 11:04 AM   #3
supa_fly_steeler
Banned
 

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: They call me bruce wayne batman cape crusader
Posts: 3,647
Gender: Male
Member Number: 15332
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: American Football in the Winter Olympics: Pros and Cons

I thought the American Football would be in the summer olympics like Soccer and the other sports no?
supa_fly_steeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2010, 11:08 AM   #4
WH
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Member Number:
Default Re: American Football in the Winter Olympics: Pros and Cons

Quote:
Originally Posted by supa_fly_steeler View Post
I thought the American Football would be in the summer olympics like Soccer and the other sports no?
No NFL team would put their player in a competitive game before the beginning of the actual NFL season.

I would still watch it even if it had no pro's in it. Come to think of it.....it might be best to do it that way, then none of the games are played like the Pro-Bowl.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2010, 12:17 PM   #5
supa_fly_steeler
Banned
 

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: They call me bruce wayne batman cape crusader
Posts: 3,647
Gender: Male
Member Number: 15332
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: American Football in the Winter Olympics: Pros and Cons

Quote:
Originally Posted by WH View Post
No NFL team would put their player in a competitive game before the beginning of the actual NFL season.

I would still watch it even if it had no pro's in it. Come to think of it.....it might be best to do it that way, then none of the games are played like the Pro-Bowl.
It wouldn't be up to the NFL, i thought olympic commitee no????
supa_fly_steeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2010, 12:36 PM   #6
steelreserve
Goatse + Tubgirl = $$$
 
steelreserve's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: www.meatspin.com
Posts: 4,599
Member Number: 1976
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: American Football in the Winter Olympics: Pros and Cons

The Olympics are, like ... 2 weeks long. How in the hell are you going to play enough football games to decide a champion? It's not like you can play every two days like you can with other sports.

Plus, even if they somehow did figure out a way to do it, no players would want to, because you'd basically be playing an extra half a season. In football, that's enough to beat you to shit and ruin your next season just from normal wear and tear, to say nothing of additional injuries.
__________________
"An empty victory is a victory nonetheless."
steelreserve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2010, 01:26 PM   #7
fansince'76
Living Legend
Supporter
 

Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 17,425
Member Number: 1984
Thanks: 141
Thanked 802 Times in 312 Posts
Default Re: American Football in the Winter Olympics: Pros and Cons

Quote:
Originally Posted by steelreserve View Post
The Olympics are, like ... 2 weeks long. How in the hell are you going to play enough football games to decide a champion? It's not like you can play every two days like you can with other sports.

Plus, even if they somehow did figure out a way to do it, no players would want to, because you'd basically be playing an extra half a season. In football, that's enough to beat you to shit and ruin your next season just from normal wear and tear, to say nothing of additional injuries.
Agreed. Stupid idea.
fansince'76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2010, 02:19 PM   #8
supa_fly_steeler
Banned
 

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: They call me bruce wayne batman cape crusader
Posts: 3,647
Gender: Male
Member Number: 15332
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: American Football in the Winter Olympics: Pros and Cons

Put like 7 a side.

3 olineman, a quarterback (4), 2 wr (5), a running back (6) and a hybird tight end reciever (7) and go up to 9....
supa_fly_steeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2010, 02:44 PM   #9
WH
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Member Number:
Default Re: American Football in the Winter Olympics: Pros and Cons

Quote:
Originally Posted by supa_fly_steeler View Post
Put like 7 a side.

3 olineman, a quarterback (4), 2 wr (5), a running back (6) and a hybird tight end reciever (7) and go up to 9....
Unless it's Bruce Arians' system then you would have no RB and 2 Tight Ends

yeah, I went there
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2010, 06:32 PM   #10
SteelersMongol
Living Legend
Supporter
 
SteelersMongol's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ulaanbaatar, MONGOLIA
Posts: 4,083
Gender: Male
Member Number: 2401
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: American Football in the Winter Olympics: Pros and Cons

All U guys who say NAY, R only thinking from the one side, which looks very selfish & unthoughtful 2 me. Sorry 2 say this. But I keep reading NO because U only want 2 keep it an American game, NO because current system is not set up 4 it, or NO just because U just hate Roger Goodell & anything he says or does won't B accepted. There R so many things that could B gained from this. All U have 2 do is, 2 C if there is any way it could actually work.

P.S. Sooner or later, U guys will B outnumbered by overseas fans. Believe that. American football is just an incredible game, that there will B more fans 4 American football than any other sports.
__________________
SteelersMongol is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum
no new posts