Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
 • Intelligent and friendly discussions.
 • It's free and it's quick. Always.
 • Enter events in the forums calendar.
 • Very user friendly software.
 • Exclusive contests and giveaways.

 Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
 Our 2013 Goal: $400.00 - To Date: $00.00 (00.00%)
 Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact Pittsburgh Steelers Forum Feed Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.

Go Back   Steelers Fever Forums > Steelers Football > Steelers Draft Central > ** The War Room 2012 **


Steelers Fever Fan Shop

Doc's Sports Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.

Steelers Steelers - Giants Giants
August 9th, 2014, 7:30pmET

CBS
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-20-2010, 07:23 AM   #1
mesaSteeler
A Son of Martha
Supporter
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 7,976
Gender: Male
Member Number: 10438
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Mocking the Steelers: Three Different Scenarios


Mocking the Steelers: Three Different Scenarios

JJ Cooper
4/19/2010 8:57 PM ET
http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2010/04/19/m...ent-scenarios/

Kyle WilsonWith the NFL draft now just three days away, it's time to get serious about who's going where. My friend Ted Kian has been studying the NFL draft for more than 20 years, and loves putting together scenarios for who the Steelers could pick and which teams could be trading partners. With that in mind, here's three potential Steelers mock drafts. One involves the Steelers trading down. One involves the Steelers trading up and one has Pittsburgh standing pat.

All picks are based on a general consensus of draft experts ratings and the trades are based on the trade value chart.

MOCK 1: Includes a trade down in the first round and trade-ups in rounds 2 and 4.

Trade (1-18) and (6-188) to Packers for (1-23) and (3-86), as Packers move up to take Mike Iupati or Anthony Davis.

1 (23): Maurkice Pouncey, 6-5, 304, C-G, Florida: Taking Pouncey at 18th overall may be too early, particularly in such a deep draft. If the Steelers stay at 18, CB Kyle Wilson or OG Mike Iupati represent better value. But Pouncey is a more surefire pick than Iupati, who has more boom/bust potential. Kevin Colbert generally likes safer picks in the first round, and Pouncey could start over Trai Essek at RG as a rookie and then settle in at center. Potentially, he could anchor the Steelers' offensive line for a decade and reignite the Pittsburgh tradition of great center play.

Trade (2-52), (3-86) and (7-225) to Tampa for (2-35)

2 (35): Devin McCourty, 5-11, 195, CB, Rutgers: CB is the Steelers' No. 1 need both for immediate help and especially for 2011, since Ike Taylor will be an unrestricted free agent after the 2010 season and William Gay could join him if a new CBA is reached. There will not be much top-line talent at CB left on the board if the Steelers sit tight at 52. Expect a run on CBs late in the first and early in the second round. McCourty has long-term No. 1 CB potential, could help out as a kick returner, and is an excellent special teams coverage player. He is also solid against the run, a must for Steelers CBs. If still on the board, Alabama's Kareem Jackson would represent a steal at this spot, but his stock has risen to where he is less likely to be on the board early in the second round than McCourty.

3 (82): Ben Tate, 5-11, 220, RB, Auburn: Steelers sit tight and hope that Tate, Mario Hardesty or Toby Gerhart falls to them, with a preference for Tate, who could be a three-down back in the NFL. They may unload one or even two of their fifth-rounders to move up if some RBs start going off the board earlier than expected. In general, though, RBs fall in the NFL draft, and any of these three would represent great value at this spot and would be an ideal No. 2 tailback to compliment Reshard Mendenhall.

Steelers trade (4-116) and (5-155) to Kansas City for (4-102)

4 (102): Thad Gibson, 6-2, 245, OLB, Ohio State: If Gibson or South Carolina's Eric Norwood fall this far and the Steelers have not drafted a LB, they should definitely consider unloading picks to move up. Norwood is a better football player right now, but Gibson has more athleticism and the Steelers do not need immediate help at LB for 2010. Long-term, Gibson could be an outstanding 3-4 OLB.

5 (151): Larry Asante, 6-0, 210, SS, Nebraska: It is a very deep safety draft and quality players like Darrell Stuckey of Kansas, Kurt Coleman of Ohio State, and Kam Chancellor of Virginia Tech all will likely fall to the middle rounds. Asante and Coleman are the likeliest of that group to fall this far. Asante would be a slight favorite to beat out Ryan Mundy for a roster spot and the reserve strong safety job.

5 (164): Emmanuel Sanders, 6-0, 170, WR, SMU: Jordan Shipley from Texas is an option if he falls this far, but Sanders appears more likely to be sitting here and may have better long-term potential. Sanders actually visited the Steelers, and also has experience returning kicks and punts. He could be battle Stefan Logan for a roster spot, and Sanders would offer far more upside as a wide out.

5 (166): Jeff Owens, 6-1, 305, NT, Georgia: Owens has a lot of talent and great functional strength, but is very inconsistent on the field. He projects as a 3-4 NT for the Steelers, in arguably what is the best overall DT draft ever in terms of top-line talent and depth. In a normal year, Owens would be gone by the early fourth round. However, there are at least five NTs above him on most draft boards. He may have to beat out Chris Hoke for a roster spot, or the Steelers could keep three NTs by cutting either Nick Eason or Sonny Harris, or simply try to hide Owens on the practice squad for a year. Regardless, there is too much talent among 3-4 defensive linemen in this draft for the Steelers to ignore that area even though they have seven quality defensive linemen signed for 2010.

7 (242): John Connor, 5-11, 245, FB, Kentucky: Not a good year for fullbacks after last draft class was loaded. But maybe after the Cleveland game last year Tomlin will insist that Arians keep a true FB on the roster. Connor is the not the best all-around or versatile FB in this class, but he is a pure bruiser who would help in short-yardage situations, a Steeler weakness since Jerome Bettis' retirement.

MOCK 2: Includes a trade-up in round 1

The Dolphins have made it clear they would like to trade down in the first round. Thus, they may take slightly less points than the trade value chart to move down to 18, where they would still be able to get one of the quality 3-4 pass rushers, such as Michigan's Brandon Graham. Bill Parcells always likes extra picks and is usually a willing trade partner on draft day.

Steelers trade (1-18), (3-82), (5-151), and (5-155) to Dolphins for (1-12). The Steelers give up 1140 of trade-value points for 1200 in this trade.

1 (12): Joe Haden, 5-11, 195, CB, Florida: Haden is the consensus No. 1 CB in this draft and could potentially give the Steelers' their first top-flight cover corner since Rod Woodson. Per Mel Kiper and Ed Bouchette, cornerback is the Steelers' No. 1 need, and it becomes an even bigger need when 2011 is factored in, since Ike Taylor is set to become an UFA and William Gay will as well if no CBA is reached. Haden may not make it to 12th overall, and the 49ers are likely to pluck him at 13 if he is on the board. It is debatable if Haden is worth four picks. But the Steelers have 11 picks, nowhere near that many roster spots, are able to keep their second-round pick in this trade, and still have five picks in the first five rounds.

2 (52): Golden Tate, 5-11, 200, WR, Notre Dame: With their CB need filled, the Steelers would have several options here and could take who ever is available among the likes of Tate, Indiana OL Roger Staffold, and Virgina Tech OLB Jason Worlids. Of course, all three may be gone, but Tate is physically is a No. 2 WR in the NFL and those kind of players tend to drop on draft day. He would be a steal at this point.

4 (116): Joe McKnight, 6-0, 180, RB, USC: McKnight's stock has fallen, because he is not considered an every-down, between-the-tackles runner. He is, though, a pure speed burner, something Pittsburgh lacks in its RB corps now with Willie Parker departed. McKnight would also be a dynamic kick returner, allowing the Steelers to cut Stefan Logan.

5 (164): Eric Olsen, 6-4, 306, C, Notre Dame: Kevin Colbert simply does not believe in taking offensive linemen early and the Steelers' problems up front are evident of this philosophy. However, at this point, the Steelers could get a potential starter at center in Olsen, who would battle Doug Legursky for a roster spot. It is a down year at guard and no tackle available at this point projects as a long-term starter, so Pittsburgh grabs the best offensive lineman on their board.

5 (166): Jamar Chaney, 6-1, 240, ILB, Mississippi State: Chaney's stock has been rising and he may be long gone at this point. But it is not inconceivable that he is still on the board here, since it is unusually deep year at ILB and Chaney is not a good fit for a 4-3 scheme.

6 (188): Arthur Moats, 6-0, 245, OLB, William & Mary: The Steelers have had great success drafting developmental OLBs in the middle and later rounds. Pittsburgh could potentially keep two rookie LBs and Moats would have plenty of time to develop.

7 (225): Brandon Deaderick, 6-4, 310, DE, Alabama: Deadrick, who knocked Texas' Colt McCoy out of the national championship, has some upside as a 3-4 end, and would enter a battle with Nick Eason and Sonny Harris in a battle for the final one or two defensive end spots on the roster.

7 (242): Cody Grimm, 5-11, 203, SS, Virginia Tech: The Steelers pluck Russ Grimm's son to battle Ryan Mundy for a roster spot. Grimm is clearly the better special-teams player and open-field tackler, so he may stick.

MOCK 3: Includes no trades and the Steelers keep all 11 picks even though they have nowhere near that many roster spots for rookies.

1 (18): Kyle Wilson, 5-10, 195, CB, Boise State: CB is clearly the Steelers' biggest need, Florida's Joe Haden will likely be off the board by this point, and Wilson, who solidified his status as the No. 2 CB on most team boards, will likely not fall further than pick No. 20 by the Texans. He is an excellent cover corner who also can return punts.

2 (52): Jason Worilds, 6-1, 255, OLB, Virginia Tech: OLB is not an immediate need for Pittsburgh, but the Steelers' brass loves the pass-rushing potential of Worilds. Developmental OT prospect Jared Veldheer from Hillsdale College is another option here or in a slight trade-down, particularly if the Steelers do not plan to sign RT Willie Colon to a long-term deal or eventually move him to OG.

3 (82): J.D. Walton, 6-3, 300, C, Baylor: Justin Hartwig's play at center is adequate at best. Walton could replace him as the Steelers' starter eventually.

4 (116): Anthony Dixon, 6-1, 235, RB, Mississippi State: Dixon would help solve the Steelers' short-yardage rushing problems and be a competent No. 2 RB immediately.

5 (151): Andre Roberts, 5-10, 190, WR, Citadel: A solid pro-day workout on a top of a tremendously productive career may have moved Roberts solidly into fourth-round territory. But his body says No. 4 WR at best in the NFL, so he may fall this far.

5 (155): Clifton Geathers, 6-8, 290, DE, South Carolina: Long-armed and possessing tremendous bloodlines, this early entry's stock is risking rapidly.

5 (164): Kurt Coleman, 5-11, 190, S, Ohio State: A solid football player and over-achiever who would be slightly favored to beat out Ryan Mundy for the No. 4 safety spot on the roster.

5 (166): Nate Byham, 6-5, 250, TE, Pitt: Matt Spaeth is a poor in-line blocker as a No. 2 TE. The Steelers have two options to improve in this respect. Draft another TE who is a quality blocker like Byham, and then either use Spaeth as the No. 3 TE (who would move up to No. 1 if Heath Miller went down with an injury), or simply cut Spaeth. The presence of hyrbid TE/HB/FBs D.J. Johnson and Sean McHugh give the Steelers flexibility, but Byham is a pure TE who is a great in-line blocker. Pittsburgh offensive coordinator Bruce Arians appears more inclined to make better use of a solid in-blocking TE than a pure FB.

6 (188): Adrian Tracy, 6-3, 245, OLB, William & Mary: The Steelers go to Mike Tomlin's alma mater to grab a pass-rushing OLB prospect with upside.

7 (225): Micah Johnson, 6-2, 260, ILB, Kentucky: Once considered a premium draft pick, Johnson's stock has fallen due to a lack of mobility and his coming off injury. The Steelers could afford to give him a redshirt year, possibly stowing him on IR or the practice squad.

7 (242): Patrick Stoudamire, 5-11, 205, CB, Western Illinois: With 11 picks and not enough roster spots for those players, Colbert starts drafting for the practice squad and potential 2011 roster.
mesaSteeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2010, 07:55 AM   #2
SteelerFanInStl
Team Captain
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 720
Gender: Male
Member Number: 2162
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Mocking the Steelers: Three Different Scenarios

I like mock #3 with Veldheer in the 2nd (with a trade down).
SteelerFanInStl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2010, 09:08 AM   #3
whatdoiknow
Banned
 

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 613
Member Number: 16053
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Mocking the Steelers: Three Different Scenarios

Quote:
Originally Posted by mesaSteeler View Post

Mocking the Steelers: Three Different Scenarios

JJ Cooper
4/19/2010 8:57 PM ET
http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2010/04/19/m...ent-scenarios/

Kyle WilsonWith the NFL draft now just three days away, it's time to get serious about who's going where. My friend Ted Kian has been studying the NFL draft for more than 20 years, and loves putting together scenarios for who the Steelers could pick and which teams could be trading partners. With that in mind, here's three potential Steelers mock drafts. One involves the Steelers trading down. One involves the Steelers trading up and one has Pittsburgh standing pat.

All picks are based on a general consensus of draft experts ratings and the trades are based on the trade value chart.

MOCK 1: Includes a trade down in the first round and trade-ups in rounds 2 and 4.

Trade (1-18) and (6-188) to Packers for (1-23) and (3-86), as Packers move up to take Mike Iupati or Anthony Davis.

1 (23): Maurkice Pouncey, 6-5, 304, C-G, Florida: Taking Pouncey at 18th overall may be too early, particularly in such a deep draft. If the Steelers stay at 18, CB Kyle Wilson or OG Mike Iupati represent better value. But Pouncey is a more surefire pick than Iupati, who has more boom/bust potential. Kevin Colbert generally likes safer picks in the first round, and Pouncey could start over Trai Essek at RG as a rookie and then settle in at center. Potentially, he could anchor the Steelers' offensive line for a decade and reignite the Pittsburgh tradition of great center play.

Trade (2-52), (3-86) and (7-225) to Tampa for (2-35)

2 (35): Devin McCourty, 5-11, 195, CB, Rutgers: CB is the Steelers' No. 1 need both for immediate help and especially for 2011, since Ike Taylor will be an unrestricted free agent after the 2010 season and William Gay could join him if a new CBA is reached. There will not be much top-line talent at CB left on the board if the Steelers sit tight at 52. Expect a run on CBs late in the first and early in the second round. McCourty has long-term No. 1 CB potential, could help out as a kick returner, and is an excellent special teams coverage player. He is also solid against the run, a must for Steelers CBs. If still on the board, Alabama's Kareem Jackson would represent a steal at this spot, but his stock has risen to where he is less likely to be on the board early in the second round than McCourty.

3 (82): Ben Tate, 5-11, 220, RB, Auburn: Steelers sit tight and hope that Tate, Mario Hardesty or Toby Gerhart falls to them, with a preference for Tate, who could be a three-down back in the NFL. They may unload one or even two of their fifth-rounders to move up if some RBs start going off the board earlier than expected. In general, though, RBs fall in the NFL draft, and any of these three would represent great value at this spot and would be an ideal No. 2 tailback to compliment Reshard Mendenhall.

Steelers trade (4-116) and (5-155) to Kansas City for (4-102)

4 (102): Thad Gibson, 6-2, 245, OLB, Ohio State: If Gibson or South Carolina's Eric Norwood fall this far and the Steelers have not drafted a LB, they should definitely consider unloading picks to move up. Norwood is a better football player right now, but Gibson has more athleticism and the Steelers do not need immediate help at LB for 2010. Long-term, Gibson could be an outstanding 3-4 OLB.

5 (151): Larry Asante, 6-0, 210, SS, Nebraska: It is a very deep safety draft and quality players like Darrell Stuckey of Kansas, Kurt Coleman of Ohio State, and Kam Chancellor of Virginia Tech all will likely fall to the middle rounds. Asante and Coleman are the likeliest of that group to fall this far. Asante would be a slight favorite to beat out Ryan Mundy for a roster spot and the reserve strong safety job.

5 (164): Emmanuel Sanders, 6-0, 170, WR, SMU: Jordan Shipley from Texas is an option if he falls this far, but Sanders appears more likely to be sitting here and may have better long-term potential. Sanders actually visited the Steelers, and also has experience returning kicks and punts. He could be battle Stefan Logan for a roster spot, and Sanders would offer far more upside as a wide out.

5 (166): Jeff Owens, 6-1, 305, NT, Georgia: Owens has a lot of talent and great functional strength, but is very inconsistent on the field. He projects as a 3-4 NT for the Steelers, in arguably what is the best overall DT draft ever in terms of top-line talent and depth. In a normal year, Owens would be gone by the early fourth round. However, there are at least five NTs above him on most draft boards. He may have to beat out Chris Hoke for a roster spot, or the Steelers could keep three NTs by cutting either Nick Eason or Sonny Harris, or simply try to hide Owens on the practice squad for a year. Regardless, there is too much talent among 3-4 defensive linemen in this draft for the Steelers to ignore that area even though they have seven quality defensive linemen signed for 2010.

7 (242): John Connor, 5-11, 245, FB, Kentucky: Not a good year for fullbacks after last draft class was loaded. But maybe after the Cleveland game last year Tomlin will insist that Arians keep a true FB on the roster. Connor is the not the best all-around or versatile FB in this class, but he is a pure bruiser who would help in short-yardage situations, a Steeler weakness since Jerome Bettis' retirement.

MOCK 2: Includes a trade-up in round 1

The Dolphins have made it clear they would like to trade down in the first round. Thus, they may take slightly less points than the trade value chart to move down to 18, where they would still be able to get one of the quality 3-4 pass rushers, such as Michigan's Brandon Graham. Bill Parcells always likes extra picks and is usually a willing trade partner on draft day.

Steelers trade (1-18), (3-82), (5-151), and (5-155) to Dolphins for (1-12). The Steelers give up 1140 of trade-value points for 1200 in this trade.

1 (12): Joe Haden, 5-11, 195, CB, Florida: Haden is the consensus No. 1 CB in this draft and could potentially give the Steelers' their first top-flight cover corner since Rod Woodson. Per Mel Kiper and Ed Bouchette, cornerback is the Steelers' No. 1 need, and it becomes an even bigger need when 2011 is factored in, since Ike Taylor is set to become an UFA and William Gay will as well if no CBA is reached. Haden may not make it to 12th overall, and the 49ers are likely to pluck him at 13 if he is on the board. It is debatable if Haden is worth four picks. But the Steelers have 11 picks, nowhere near that many roster spots, are able to keep their second-round pick in this trade, and still have five picks in the first five rounds.

2 (52): Golden Tate, 5-11, 200, WR, Notre Dame: With their CB need filled, the Steelers would have several options here and could take who ever is available among the likes of Tate, Indiana OL Roger Staffold, and Virgina Tech OLB Jason Worlids. Of course, all three may be gone, but Tate is physically is a No. 2 WR in the NFL and those kind of players tend to drop on draft day. He would be a steal at this point.

4 (116): Joe McKnight, 6-0, 180, RB, USC: McKnight's stock has fallen, because he is not considered an every-down, between-the-tackles runner. He is, though, a pure speed burner, something Pittsburgh lacks in its RB corps now with Willie Parker departed. McKnight would also be a dynamic kick returner, allowing the Steelers to cut Stefan Logan.

5 (164): Eric Olsen, 6-4, 306, C, Notre Dame: Kevin Colbert simply does not believe in taking offensive linemen early and the Steelers' problems up front are evident of this philosophy. However, at this point, the Steelers could get a potential starter at center in Olsen, who would battle Doug Legursky for a roster spot. It is a down year at guard and no tackle available at this point projects as a long-term starter, so Pittsburgh grabs the best offensive lineman on their board.

5 (166): Jamar Chaney, 6-1, 240, ILB, Mississippi State: Chaney's stock has been rising and he may be long gone at this point. But it is not inconceivable that he is still on the board here, since it is unusually deep year at ILB and Chaney is not a good fit for a 4-3 scheme.

6 (188): Arthur Moats, 6-0, 245, OLB, William & Mary: The Steelers have had great success drafting developmental OLBs in the middle and later rounds. Pittsburgh could potentially keep two rookie LBs and Moats would have plenty of time to develop.

7 (225): Brandon Deaderick, 6-4, 310, DE, Alabama: Deadrick, who knocked Texas' Colt McCoy out of the national championship, has some upside as a 3-4 end, and would enter a battle with Nick Eason and Sonny Harris in a battle for the final one or two defensive end spots on the roster.

7 (242): Cody Grimm, 5-11, 203, SS, Virginia Tech: The Steelers pluck Russ Grimm's son to battle Ryan Mundy for a roster spot. Grimm is clearly the better special-teams player and open-field tackler, so he may stick.

MOCK 3: Includes no trades and the Steelers keep all 11 picks even though they have nowhere near that many roster spots for rookies.

1 (18): Kyle Wilson, 5-10, 195, CB, Boise State: CB is clearly the Steelers' biggest need, Florida's Joe Haden will likely be off the board by this point, and Wilson, who solidified his status as the No. 2 CB on most team boards, will likely not fall further than pick No. 20 by the Texans. He is an excellent cover corner who also can return punts.

2 (52): Jason Worilds, 6-1, 255, OLB, Virginia Tech: OLB is not an immediate need for Pittsburgh, but the Steelers' brass loves the pass-rushing potential of Worilds. Developmental OT prospect Jared Veldheer from Hillsdale College is another option here or in a slight trade-down, particularly if the Steelers do not plan to sign RT Willie Colon to a long-term deal or eventually move him to OG.

3 (82): J.D. Walton, 6-3, 300, C, Baylor: Justin Hartwig's play at center is adequate at best. Walton could replace him as the Steelers' starter eventually.

4 (116): Anthony Dixon, 6-1, 235, RB, Mississippi State: Dixon would help solve the Steelers' short-yardage rushing problems and be a competent No. 2 RB immediately.

5 (151): Andre Roberts, 5-10, 190, WR, Citadel: A solid pro-day workout on a top of a tremendously productive career may have moved Roberts solidly into fourth-round territory. But his body says No. 4 WR at best in the NFL, so he may fall this far.

5 (155): Clifton Geathers, 6-8, 290, DE, South Carolina: Long-armed and possessing tremendous bloodlines, this early entry's stock is risking rapidly.

5 (164): Kurt Coleman, 5-11, 190, S, Ohio State: A solid football player and over-achiever who would be slightly favored to beat out Ryan Mundy for the No. 4 safety spot on the roster.

5 (166): Nate Byham, 6-5, 250, TE, Pitt: Matt Spaeth is a poor in-line blocker as a No. 2 TE. The Steelers have two options to improve in this respect. Draft another TE who is a quality blocker like Byham, and then either use Spaeth as the No. 3 TE (who would move up to No. 1 if Heath Miller went down with an injury), or simply cut Spaeth. The presence of hyrbid TE/HB/FBs D.J. Johnson and Sean McHugh give the Steelers flexibility, but Byham is a pure TE who is a great in-line blocker. Pittsburgh offensive coordinator Bruce Arians appears more inclined to make better use of a solid in-blocking TE than a pure FB.

6 (188): Adrian Tracy, 6-3, 245, OLB, William & Mary: The Steelers go to Mike Tomlin's alma mater to grab a pass-rushing OLB prospect with upside.

7 (225): Micah Johnson, 6-2, 260, ILB, Kentucky: Once considered a premium draft pick, Johnson's stock has fallen due to a lack of mobility and his coming off injury. The Steelers could afford to give him a redshirt year, possibly stowing him on IR or the practice squad.

7 (242): Patrick Stoudamire, 5-11, 205, CB, Western Illinois: With 11 picks and not enough roster spots for those players, Colbert starts drafting for the practice squad and potential 2011 roster.




Well for get the trsd up with Miami cause the Dolphins are fixed on Thomas. And even Haden if one is still there. If not, then they will go for a DE/DT.
As for the 3rd scenario, I guess Kyle Wilson might be a possibility, and several others like Geathers and Dixon are players I feel the Steelers will be looking at. But
I don't know what Bizzaro world you think Pittsburgh would select Worilds in round 2. The guy had average production in college, and has major Injury concerns, and is a borderline late late 3rd, more likely a 4th round player. And they won't select 3 LB's in this draft.


The best thing about this draft is that I don't think there is a clear cut player in round 1 that any of us can say the Steelers are looking at. Yes Wilson is one. But Pouncey is another. I think if either McClain or Weatherspoon would be considered if they are still there. And maybe even a T like Davis. But if I had to go with one of your scenarios, it would be the third. But NO WAY is Worilds even considered at 52. Not even at 82.
whatdoiknow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2010, 10:10 AM   #4
blitzburgh56
Water Boy
 

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 25
Member Number: 15815
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Mocking the Steelers: Three Different Scenarios

I would be thrilled with the second mock. Joe Haden and Golden Tate in the first two rounds would be amazing. The only thing is, I do not know if Tate will still be available at 52.
blitzburgh56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2010, 10:23 AM   #5
Steel_12
Starter
Supporter
 
Steel_12's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Fort Walton Beach, Florida
Posts: 475
Gender: Male
Member Number: 8295
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Mocking the Steelers: Three Different Scenarios

I'm hoping the 2nd mock comes true. I like Joe McKnight.
Steel_12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2010, 10:40 AM   #6
revefsreleets
Living Legend
 
revefsreleets's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Akron, Ohio Home of LeBron James
Posts: 15,403
Gender: Male
Member Number: 5353
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Mocking the Steelers: Three Different Scenarios

A word about the Buckeyes in this mock. I'd rather pick up Lawrence Wilson as a late (like last) round or even UDFA. He's got tremendous upside IF he can stay healthy. He could gain some wright and play DE or lose some weight and shift to OLB. I'd rather have him for next to nothing than take the chance with Thad Gibson.

Also, love the Coleman pick in the 5th.
__________________
Official Steelersfever Arians Nuthugger
revefsreleets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2010, 12:29 PM   #7
atlee731
Water Boy
 

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 44
Member Number: 15893
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Mocking the Steelers: Three Different Scenarios

I'd really like the 1st scenario. At least the first 2 picks are excellent. A top two of Pouncey/McCourty or Pouncey/KJackson would let me get back to the rest of my weekend without worrying too much about the other picks. In the third, I like Tate, but I'd like to come out of the draft with an ILB so maybe:

1 - Pouncey
2 - Jackson
3 - Sean Lee
4 - Anthony Dixon
5 - O'Brien Schofield or Moats
5 - Asante or Alterraun Verner
5 - Ramon Harewood
7 - Jim Dray
atlee731 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2010, 03:39 PM   #8
SS43Polamalu
Draft Prospect
 
SS43Polamalu's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 74
Gender: Male
Member Number: 15886
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Mocking the Steelers: Three Different Scenarios

Draft two for sure, i love that we used some of our picks to get some top players instead of keeping them all and drafting people that might not even make the team. If we can get Joe Haden, Golden Tate and Joe McKnight i would be very happy.
__________________
SS43Polamalu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2010, 04:10 PM   #9
Aussie_steeler
Head Coach
 
Aussie_steeler's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,814
Gender: Male
Member Number: 5037
Thanks: 1
Thanked 16 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: Mocking the Steelers: Three Different Scenarios

I would take Mock 1.

Pouncey, McCourty, Tate I think are great picks.

Also like the Sanders, Owens and Asante picks.

I am still unsure about the best fit at OLB in that 4th round area. I believe Norwood will be gone. The 4th round to me looks like a round where you will have to reach for a pass rush OLB.
__________________
Aussie_steeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2010, 09:32 PM   #10
atlee731
Water Boy
 

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 44
Member Number: 15893
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Mocking the Steelers: Three Different Scenarios

Actually, I still like mock 1, but without the third trade. Might as well keep the extra 5th instead of moving up 14 places in the 4th.

1 - Pouncey
2 - Jackson (or McCourty)
3 - Sean Lee
4 - Anthony Dixon
5 - O'Brien Schofield or Moats
5 - Asante or Alterraun Verner
5 - Ramon Harewood
5 - Blair White or Dezmon Briscoe
7 - Jim Dray
atlee731 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum
no new posts