Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
 • Intelligent and friendly discussions.
 • It's free and it's quick. Always.
 • Enter events in the forums calendar.
 • Very user friendly software.
 • Exclusive contests and giveaways.

 Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
 Our 2014 Goal: $450.00 - To Date: $450.00 (100.00%)
 Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact Pittsburgh Steelers Forum Feed Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.

Go Back   Steelers Fever Forums > Steelers Football > Pittsburgh Steelers


Steelers Fever Fan Shop

Doc's Sports Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.

Steelers

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-27-2010, 08:30 PM   #1
mesaSteeler
A Son of Martha
Supporter
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 7,976
Gender: Male
Member Number: 10438
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Money Matters: The Woodley Dilemma

Money Matters: The Woodley Dilemma
http://pit.scout.com/2/966042.html
By Ian Whetstone
SCI Resident Capologist
Posted Apr 27, 2010

Because of the new cap rules, the Steelers find themselves in a tricky situation in extending LaMarr Woodley's contract before he becomes a free agent in 2011.

PITTSBURGH -- In an offseason chock full of controversy, almost no one can dispute that LaMarr Woodley has earned a lucrative contract extension. He’s been a great fit in Pittsburgh’s defense, on and off the field, seemingly from the moment the Steelers selected him in the second round of the 2007 draft.

In any normal year, a new deal for the Pro Bowl linebacker would be a slam dunk as he prepares to enter the his final season under his rookie deal, and I have no doubt that both the player and the club would love to make one happen.

But the uncapped 2010 is anything but a normal year, and a new contract for Woodley faces a significant—and maybe insurmountable—obstacle in the form of the 30% Rule. Designed to prevent teams from giving out contracts in advance that stuff a disproportionate amount of compensation into a potentially uncapped year, it also has an awful side effect on players in Woodley’s contract position. The relevant portion of the rule, as defined in the collective bargaining agreement, is as follows:

“No NFL Player Contract entered into in a Capped Year and extending into the Final League Year or beyond may provide for an annual increase in Salary, excluding any amount attributable to a signing bonus ... of more than 30% of the Salary provided for in the Final Capped Year, per year, either in the Final League Year or in any subsequent League Year covered by the Player Contract.”

The short version of what this means now is that an extension for a player who has remained under contract from 2009 through 2010 can provide for an increase per year of only 30% of his 2009 non-signing bonus salary. Woodley made just $460,000 in 2009 as part of his rookie deal, the minimum salary for a third-year player. This currently limits his salary under a potential new deal to just $598,000 in 2010, $736,000 in 2011, $874,000 in 2012, and an additional $138,000 greater for every year thereafter.

On a new six-year deal, that means a maximum total salary of just $5,658,000. Obviously, that’s a paltry portion of what Woodley stands to command. At the position of 3-4 OLB, Jerry Jones gave super-stud DeMarcus Ware the gold standard contract last year: a six-year extension worth $78 million. A more reasonable comparison may be the six-year, $62.5 million deal that Terrell Suggs signed with Baltimore last year, or James Harrison’s five-year extension for $43,775,000 in new money.

The loophole in the 30% Rule is that signing bonuses do not count toward its calculations or limits. Essentially, teams can attach any amount of signing bonus to a contract and maintain compliance under the rule. But, it’s simply not feasible to offer a player such as Woodley the $50+ million signing bonus that it would take to make up the balance on a six-year deal.

I won’t rule out that somebody will devise a creative way around this dilemma, but I haven’t seen it happen yet. New Orleans worked around other 30% Rule limitations last year by creative use of something called a completion bonus. However, I know of no other teams that have used that particular device since, so I suspect that the league office put the unofficial kibosh on it after the Saints slipped their deals through. Also, the Steelers organization has a track record of almost dogmatic adherence to the spirit of the league’s accounting policies that goes beyond simple observance of the letter of the rules, so I’m skeptical that they’d be eager to play as fast and loose with unconventional structures as some other clubs might.

I could see the possibility of a team constructing a contract comparable to what they do for high first-round rookies, whose contracts are similarly constrained by the rookie salary pool and a 25% Rule that applies only to rookie deals. These deals typically feature a lot of their “base” value attached to performance thresholds that are deemed unlikely to be met by the CBA, but as a practical matter are very easy to achieve.

My guess is that this is what Cleveland did with Joshua Cribbs to work around the 30% Rule with his recent pay raise. But, it works with rookies largely because they have no body of work upon which to base the likelihood of achievement, and so the thresholds can be set quite low. Likewise, Cribbs has had limited statistical production of the relevant sort in his career, with a promise of greater offensive involvement yet to come upon which to base such compensation escalators. For a player like Woodley, coming off of a season of such strong achievement in every way that matters at his position, how do you construct that kind of a deal? If there’s a way, I don’t see it. Moreover, I can’t imagine that an agent would ever go for it.

It’s a relatively small number of players who are being impacted by this aspect of the uncapped year. With Santonio Holmes gone, Woodley is the only Steelers player for whom the rule presents any meaningful consequence, and is surely among the highest-profile players around the league to be so affected.

Surely nobody involved, from the front office to the player to the coaches to the fans, wants to see LaMarr Woodley wearing anything but black and gold next year or beyond. So, what are the options? I doubt very much that the expanded restricted free agency rules that apply in the uncapped 2010 will have any bearing on 2011. 2011 will either be controlled by some kind of new agreement—and I can’t envision the union agreeing to any deal that extends what has been the most poisonous of pills for their rank and file—or else there won’t be football in 2011, in which case restricted status will be irrelevant. So, counting on Woodley being restricted in 2011 is folly, to my mind.

I do think that it’s likely that the next agreement will maintain the availability of a franchise tag, although possibly in a form less pleasant for teams than currently exists. So, that will probably be an option. Another that I wouldn’t overlook is a short-term extension. It’s unreasonable to make up the dollars required on a long-term extension with a gigantic signing bonus, but something like a $9 million signing bonus on a one-year extension with low base salaries would not be outlandish. It would, in essence, be like a proactive franchise tag. It’d be far from an ideal scenario for any party involved, but under the circumstances, it might be better than any of the alternatives.
mesaSteeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 08:37 PM   #2
Steelerfreak58
Team Captain
 
Steelerfreak58's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Modesto
Posts: 934
Gender: Male
Member Number: 8080
Thanks: 45
Thanked 108 Times in 47 Posts
Default Re: Money Matters: The Woodley Dilemma

They will figure something out! They better!
__________________
Steelerfreak58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 09:07 PM   #3
SteelKnight
Team President
 

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,256
Member Number: 16119
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Money Matters: The Woodley Dilemma

Woodley is good but he is replacable. The Steelers should offer him something that comes out to about 5 million per year and if he says no, let him walk. Worilds will be ready next year and Gibson will back him up.

We can't afford to be paying an OLB 10 million per year. That would make Troys and Timmons contracts unreasonable.

He should get a 5 year 25 million dollar contract and if he says no, bye.

We never have trouble replacing our LBs ...never.

Ike is way more important. Even Nnamdi As gave Ike some props today.
SteelKnight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 09:15 PM   #4
mesaSteeler
A Son of Martha
Supporter
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 7,976
Gender: Male
Member Number: 10438
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Money Matters: The Woodley Dilemma

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelKnight View Post
Woodley is good but he is replacable. The Steelers should offer him something that come out to about 5 million per year and if he says no, let him walk. Worilds will be ready next year and Gibson will back him up.

We can't afford to be paying an OLB 10 million per year. That would make Troys and Timmons contracts unreasonable.

He should get a 5 year 25 million dollar contract and if he says no, bye.

We never have trouble replacing our LBs ...never.

Ike is way more important. Even Nnamdi As gave Ike some props today.
I agree. No one player is indispensable including who ever is playing QB. If we can sign him at the market value then well and good. If not then let him walk. A lot will depend on how well he plays this season. Remember Kendrell Bell?
mesaSteeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 09:24 PM   #5
Steeldude
Living Legend
 
Steeldude's Avatar
Default Re: Money Matters: The Woodley Dilemma

Quote:
but he is replacable
yep
__________________
Kordell Stewart + Starting QB Spot = 0
Steeldude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 09:41 PM   #6
BlastFurnace
Living Legend
 
BlastFurnace's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 3,778
Gender: Male
Member Number: 6321
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Money Matters: The Woodley Dilemma

I do not think he is easily replaceable. He is a great pass rusher. They must find a way to get this done. Harrison won't go on forever and he is already 32. The OLB'ers drive our defense. We have no idea what we have in our new draft picks. We know what we have with Woodley.

Make it happen Colbert.
BlastFurnace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 09:51 PM   #7
Godfather
Living Legend
Supporter
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,140
Member Number: 547
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Money Matters: The Woodley Dilemma

Thanks again Roger Baddell.

If we had a competent commisioner this issue would be resolved by now.
Godfather is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 09:51 PM   #8
steelreserve
Goatse + Tubgirl = $$$
 
steelreserve's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: www.meatspin.com
Posts: 4,599
Member Number: 1976
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Money Matters: The Woodley Dilemma

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlastFurnace View Post
I do not think he is easily replaceable. He is a great pass rusher.
Yeah, just like every other great pass rusher we've had wasn't easily replaceable. Why do you think we took so many linebackers? We're prepared.

I definitely would like to see him stick around for another deal, but if we're talking $10M a year, that's pretty preposterous and I'd wish him good luck on the Redskins. He's very good, but he is maybe the fifth-best player on our defense, which means we can't afford to pay him like he's the #1 star. He wants that money, he'll have to go to a shit team where he IS the #1 star.
__________________
"An empty victory is a victory nonetheless."
steelreserve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 09:55 PM   #9
7willBheaven
Starter
 
7willBheaven's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 571
Member Number: 13312
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Money Matters: The Woodley Dilemma

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelKnight View Post
Woodley is good but he is replacable. The Steelers should offer him something that comes out to about 5 million per year and if he says no, let him walk. Worilds will be ready next year and Gibson will back him up.

We can't afford to be paying an OLB 10 million per year. That would make Troys and Timmons contracts unreasonable.

He should get a 5 year 25 million dollar contract and if he says no, bye.

We never have trouble replacing our LBs ...never.

Ike is way more important. Even Nnamdi As gave Ike some props today.
You apparently didnt read or understand the article. With the CBA rules for the uncapped year, the contract extension rules changed...as it says in the article...

"The short version of what this means now is that an extension for a player who has remained under contract from 2009 through 2010 can provide for an increase per year of only 30% of his 2009 non-signing bonus salary. Woodley made just $460,000 in 2009 as part of his rookie deal, the minimum salary for a third-year player. This currently limits his salary under a potential new deal to just $598,000 in 2010, $736,000 in 2011, $874,000 in 2012, and an additional $138,000 greater for every year thereafter.

On a new six-year deal, that means a maximum total salary of just $5,658,000. "

So the MOST they can offer for base salary is....

2010 - 598,000 (just add 138,000 on top of the previous years total from here on out)
2011 - 736,000
2012 - 874,000
2013 - 1,012,000
2014 - 1,150,000
2015 - 1,288,000

Total - $5,658,000

They cant give him more than that...and they cant throw in 25,000,000 signing bonus (to equal the 5 mil a year deal you mentioned).

If there arent any other ways around this...I would say doing a 1 or 2 year extension and throw in a nice but yet reasonable bonus so hes making around say 5 mil a year or whatever...then once a new CBA/etc is in place...THEN..work out a long term deal....which is what the guy who wrote the article mentioned.
7willBheaven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 09:55 PM   #10
steelreserve
Goatse + Tubgirl = $$$
 
steelreserve's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: www.meatspin.com
Posts: 4,599
Member Number: 1976
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Money Matters: The Woodley Dilemma

Quote:
Originally Posted by Godfather View Post
Thanks again Roger Baddell.

If we had a competent commisioner this issue would be resolved by now.
Seriously. Have they even been TRYING to get that done? I haven't heard anything about a new labor deal in months, but apparently the commissioner has plenty of time to spend worrying about player conduct and new overtime rules and games in London.

Yeah -- overtime rules that will never be used and games in London that will never happen BECAUSE THERE WILL BE NO GAMES IF YOU DON'T GET THE LABOR DEAL DONE FIRST, SHITHEAD.
__________________
"An empty victory is a victory nonetheless."
steelreserve is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum
no new posts