Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
 • Intelligent and friendly discussions.
 • It's free and it's quick. Always.
 • Enter events in the forums calendar.
 • Very user friendly software.
 • Exclusive contests and giveaways.

 Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
 Our 2014 Goal: $450.00 - To Date: $450.00 (100.00%)
 Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact Pittsburgh Steelers Forum Feed Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.

Go Back   Steelers Fever Forums > Steelers Football > Pittsburgh Steelers


Steelers Fever Fan Shop

Doc's Sports Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.

Steelers Fever Presents...

Steelers Panthers

GAMEDAY
Sunday, September 21, 8:30 PM
NBC
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-31-2010, 07:37 PM   #1
mesaSteeler
A Son of Martha
Supporter
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 7,976
Gender: Male
Member Number: 10438
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Jared Veldheer: The OT Who Should Have Been the Steelers’ 2010

Jared Veldheer: The OT Who Should Have Been the Steelers’ 2010 2nd-Round Pick
Posted on December 31, 2010 by ted
Steelers Lounge
http://www.steelerslounge.com/2010/1...2ndround-pick/

The Steelers’ 2010 draft class has already paid huge dividends and appears to be one of Pittsburgh’s best and deepest draft hauls in recent years. Eight of the 10 draft picks are still on the 53-man roster and five are making key contributions for the 11-4 Steelers, including rookie Pro-Bowl selection Maurkice Pouncey.

However, the one head-scratcher from that draft was tabbing OLB prospect Jason Worilds in the second round, since that was earlier than most had Worilds projected and he will likely not start in Pittsburgh for several years – if ever. Instead, as J.J. can affirm that I begged for at the time, that second-round pick should have been Jared Veldheer. The Steelers would be better off now and have a much brighter future at offensive tackle if they had picked Veldheer last year.

Veldheer is now the starting left tackle for the Raiders. The 6-foot-8, 315-pounder actually began the season as the team’s starting center, but has been protecting the blindside for the last eight games for an Oakland squad that is second in the NFL in rushing yards per game (152.3) despite having no quality receivers or a decent quarterback.

Now, truth be told, I always call out at least two possible names as desired picks after the first round and the other name I yelled last year before the Steelers’ second-round selection was Golden Tate, the Notre Dame receiver. Tate, though, is nowhere near as good as Steelers’ third-round pick Emmanuel Sanders, and having Tate instead of Sanders would make a slow Pittsburgh receiving corps even slower.

Moreover, I did not expect Veldheer to come in from Hillsdale College and be a starting left tackle in the NFL as a rookie. No one did. In fact, I figured Veldheer would be a reserve as a rookie whose only chance of starting for any team would be at right guard, figured that he might be able to start at right tackle by year No. 2 and could theoretically be a starting left tackle down the road.

Still, tackle is such a huge need for the Steelers in the future that Veldheer was worthy of the Steelers’ second-round pick last year, particularly since many experts had him going off the board earlier even though he ultimately lasted until the fifth pick of the third round.

Now, no one could project that Pittsburgh would lose both of its starting OTs (Willie Colon and Max Starks) to season-ending injuries in 2010. The signing of veteran Flozell Adams to replace Colon saved the Steelers’ season and joureyman Jonathan Scott has been serviceable at times in replacing Starks at left tackle.

However, tackle was a major need for the Steelers in the 2010 NFL Draft, since Colon is slated to be an unrestricted free agent after 2010 (assuming a CBA is reached) and the team had virtually no depth behind Colon and Starks on the outside.

But yet the Steelers finished off their 10th consecutive draft without taking an offensive tackle prospect in the first two rounds, the only team in the NFL to not do so in the past decade.

Roger Goodell’s recent comments about the league’s labor strife makes it now seem more likely that a labor accord will be reached that allows Colon to become an UFA, meaning there is a good chance he will leave the Steelers, since the front office has never put a premium on retaining Colon, who will also be coming back from an Achilles tear. That means Adams will probably again be the team’s right tackle in 2011 when he is 36.

That also means that tackle is a major need for the Steelers in the 2011 draft, although the veteran Steelers again will have more immediate needs (RG, CB), where upgrades could give them a better chance of winning another Super Bowl.

However, it is inconceivable to project Adams to still play in 2012, meaning that the Steelers will have to draft his likely replacement this April in a down year for tackle prospects or expect a late, first-round pick in 2012 to start at tackle as a rookie. It sure would have been nice to have Veldheer inked in as a future, long-term starter at one tackle spot.

Now, that does not mean that Worilds is a bad player. He was just a luxury pick by a franchise with an aging roster that could not afford to do so in the second round of the 2010 NFL Draft. Pro Football Weekly wrongly dubbed Worilds as one of the five biggest reaches in the entire 2011 NFL Draft. But that was absurd, since he was projected as a 2nd-4th-round pick by almost every draft service.

Worilds, however, may have been available with the Steelers’ third-round pick, as tweener DE/OLB Jermaine Cunningham was the only player listed by anyone as an OLB prospect that was selected after the Worilds pick before the Steelers took Thad Gibson in the fourth round, only to release him early in the season because they were too deep at linebacker.

Worilds has also been a special-teams stud for the Steelers this fall and showcased raw speed as a pass rusher in helping the Steelers preserve a 23-22 win at Miami this year after starter LaMarr Woodley left the game due to injury.

But Worilds is actually the team’s No. 4 OLB, since ILB Lawrence Timmons moves to the outside if either of the Steelers’ superstar starting OLBs in James Harrison and Woodley goes down.

Woodley is likely to be signed to a long-term deal as soon as possible and will be franchised (the tag will likely be restored if/when a new CBA is reached) to keep him in Pittsburgh if a deal cannot be worked out quickly.

Harrison, meanwhile, has shown no signs of slowing down in the second year of a six-year contract, which likely means he has another two — and probably three — years as a starter. That means Worilds could be an unrestricted free agent before he ever becomes a regular starter in Pittsburgh; and teams should never take someone with their second-round pick to be a backup for four years while ignoring positions of major need.

And do not buy the BS motto that the Steelers or any other team that claims to take the best player available (BPA). Wrong. The Steelers come into drafts with positions of need and look to fill those positions in various rounds, taking into account their overall draft board.

The Steelers did not need a starting RB when it selected Rashard Mendenhall in the first round of the 2008 NFL Draft, but they did need a No. 2 RB and knew that Willie Parker would not be an NFL starter for much longer. With the exception of Mendenhall and QB Ben Roethlisberger (2004), all other Steeler first-round picks in the past decade filled immediate needs.

Moreover, the only times Pittsburgh drafts the BPA on its board in the first four rounds without taking into account its needs has been for OLBs in the mostly successful Kevin Colbert era, with the one exception of taking TE Matt Spaeth in the third round of the 2007 NFL Draft.

At that time the Steelers had its young, starting tight end Heath Miller secured to a long-term deal and also had a quality No. 2 tight end in Jermane Tuman, who had just completed the first season of a three-year deal. However, Pittsburgh offensive coordinator Bruce Arians argued for drafting Spaeth that year, because of his value as a red-zone target and as a receiver.

Spaeth was a poor blocker for his first 2.5 years before improving in that respect in the second half of the 2009 season and that has continued this fall. Unfortunately, his increased bulk has negated any separation speed he once possessed, and his 36 career receptions to go with six career drops does not equate to a good pick when the Steelers passed up Marshal Yanda at that spot despite everyone projecting Pittsburgh to take at least one offensive linemen with its first three picks that year. Yanda has started all 15 games for the Ravens this fall.

However, at least Spaeth was drafted in the round where most expected him to go. All other head-scratchers in the Colbert era were outside linebacker picks. Taking Bruce Davis in the third round of the 2008 NFL Draft was absurd since Pittsburgh’s need for linebacker depth was much less then than it was in 2010 and Davis was projected as a 4th-6th-rounder. He was a bust. My preferred pick in that spot was Oniel Cousins and yes, I would much rather have the Ravens’ offensive line than our current group.

And of course the stupidest pick of all was taking Alonzo Jackson in the second round in 2003 when no one else thought the 266-pound Jackson could convert to a 3-4 OLB, nor did anyone project him to go in the second round after an unimpressive postseason.

In other words, the Steelers generally do not take BPA or reach for players at non-need areas unless they are outside linebackers, and that philosophy is why Pittsburgh has the best starting four and deepest group of linebackers in the NFL to go with lousy No. 2-3 corners, a poor offensive line, and an aging defensive line.

Colbert and the entire Steelers’ front office should be commended for a superb 2010 NFL Draft and running an exemplary organization. But the Steelers’ proclivity for ignoring offensive tackle while falling in love with too many outside linebackers in the draft is why the team’s future at tackle looks so bleak.

Last edited by mesaSteeler; 12-31-2010 at 08:29 PM.
mesaSteeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2010, 08:11 PM   #2
mesaSteeler
A Son of Martha
Supporter
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 7,976
Gender: Male
Member Number: 10438
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Jared Veldheer: The OT Who Should Have Been the Steelers’ 2010

Rereading this excellent analysis I can't help but wonder WHY?

Why have we ignored the tackle position?

Is it because LeBeau is in love with linebackers?

Is it because Tomlin would rather daft skill players on offensive instead of lineman? I seem to recall he said that a few years ago.

Is it because Arians is a fool?

What ever the reason why our poor O-Line is taking years of Ben's career.

Why have we done this? Thoughts?

Last edited by mesaSteeler; 12-31-2010 at 08:26 PM.
mesaSteeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2010, 08:18 PM   #3
TRH
Living Legend
 
TRH's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: eastern PA
Posts: 4,460
Gender: Male
Member Number: 17206
Thanks: 103
Thanked 244 Times in 167 Posts
Default Re: Jared Veldheer: The OT Who Should Have Been the Steelers’ 2010

I disagree with the analysis that Worilds won't be a starter "for several years...if ever". If ever?
But i do agree that they should have taken Veldheer. What the hell were they thinking? It really, REALLY shows that we've ignored O-Linemen in the draft. Its really coming back to bite us now. It's not only affecting the passing game, but now its affecting Mendenhall's running as well.
We really need to get off this "ignore the teams needs...draft the best player available" soapbox and start drafting what we need.
I will absolutely laugh my ass off next year if we take a Linebacker in the 1st round. I'm joking...but the funny thing is...i wouldn't be surprised!!!!
TRH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2011, 03:18 AM   #4
Steeldude
Living Legend
 
Steeldude's Avatar
Default Re: Jared Veldheer: The OT Who Should Have Been the Steelers’ 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by mesaSteeler View Post
Rereading this excellent analysis I can't help but wonder WHY?

Why have we ignored the tackle position? because the steelers have become content with low-round picks and below-average free agents.

Is it because LeBeau is in love with linebackers? they were ignoring LBs too until they draft two early(timmons, woodley).

Is it because Tomlin would rather daft skill players on offensive instead of lineman? I seem to recall he said that a few years ago. IMO, the steelers have become enamored with drafting WRs early.

Is it because Arians is a fool? could be, but i don't know how much say, if any, he has in the draft.

What ever the reason why our poor O-Line is taking years of Ben's career. very true and i don't see it changing. although BR deserves a lot of criticism for holding the ball too long. arians is to blame too for sending WRs on such long routes.

Why have we done this? Thoughts? who knows? i have been saying the steelers need to address this the O-line since 2002. many fans shouted me down on message boards for suggesting such a thing. most of those fans were the ones clamoring for WRs. i will be surprised if the steelers actually put some thought into drafting an O-line in the 2011 draft
...
__________________
Kordell Stewart + Starting QB Spot = 0
Steeldude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2011, 04:45 AM   #5
Rick5895
Team President
 
Rick5895's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: St.Thomas, ontario , canada
Posts: 2,143
Gender: Male
Member Number: 5148
Thanks: 21
Thanked 41 Times in 26 Posts
Default Re: Jared Veldheer: The OT Who Should Have Been the Steelers’ 2010

I would assume Worilds was taken as a a depth for the older Harrison and the fact the Woodlley is in his last year of his contract. Worilds is also a very good special teams player. At the time of the draft we had 2 decent starting OT (Starks and Colon).
It is easy to go back and say shoulda, woulda , coulda, but reaching for a player, and that is what we would have done in the case of Veldeer, in the 2nd round can be a mistake. We have had very good production from our draft classs this season.
Pouncey is a pro bowler, Worilds is learning OLB and has been a force on ST, Sanders and Brown have done a great job for us.
I am sure we will see an OL in the upcoming draft as well as depth at other positions. Over the years the Steelers seeming draft the best player available (as they see it) and it has worked out pretty well.
Rick5895 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2011, 05:57 AM   #6
pete74
Super Moderator
Supporter
 
pete74's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: pittsburgh
Posts: 3,281
Member Number: 15921
Thanks: 94
Thanked 428 Times in 225 Posts
Default Re: Jared Veldheer: The OT Who Should Have Been the Steelers’ 2010

I would love to have Jared Veldheer. i would take him over Worilds in a second but i still have a ton of predraft magazines and there isnt a single writer that thoght he could make it as a LT in the NFL. most people thought he would be playing guard and he has sure proven them wrong with his strong play.

there are many players that the writers wrote off and said they would never be top players that proved them wrong. I would love to be able to go back and see what the top anylists said about Colston before the Saints drafted him in the 6th round.

anyway there are no takebacks in the draft so there is no point worrying about who we could of had. the GM's job is to figure out who will be able to make it in the NFL and there is no such thing as a perfect formula for that
__________________
pete74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2011, 07:17 AM   #7
Atlanta Dan
Resigned
Supporter
 
Atlanta Dan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,829
Member Number: 728
Thanks: 2,287
Thanked 7,333 Times in 3,278 Posts
Default Re: Jared Veldheer: The OT Who Should Have Been the Steelers’ 2010

Steelers were not going to pick another OL in the second round of the draft after picking Pouncey in the first round no matter who was available - I would be surprised if the Steelers have used their top 2 picks in the draft on the same position (even LB) anytime in the past 15 years
Atlanta Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2011, 07:36 AM   #8
Whodis
Team Captain
 
Whodis's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sunnyvale Trailer Park
Posts: 738
Gender: Male
Member Number: 6483
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Jared Veldheer: The OT Who Should Have Been the Steelers’ 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta Dan View Post
Steelers were not going to pick another OL in the second round of the draft after picking Pouncey in the first round no matter who was available - I would be surprised if the Steelers have used their top 2 picks in the draft on the same position (even LB) anytime in the past 15 years
^ I agree with this. And it's not like we have that great of a track record with drafting O-linemen in the 1st two rounds
__________________
Whodis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2011, 01:21 PM   #9
MasterOfPuppets
Living Legend
Supporter
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,154
Gender: Male
Member Number: 1990
Thanks: 880
Thanked 3,668 Times in 1,583 Posts
Default Re: Jared Veldheer: The OT Who Should Have Been the Steelers’ 2010

next year when someone out bids the steelers for lamarr woodley , you guys will be glad they took worilds.
__________________
“If tyranny and oppression come to this land it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.” ― James Madison

"When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty." - Thomas Jefferson

"The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first." -Thomas Jefferson

"The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers." - Thomas Jefferson

MasterOfPuppets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2011, 01:29 PM   #10
mesaSteeler
A Son of Martha
Supporter
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 7,976
Gender: Male
Member Number: 10438
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Jared Veldheer: The OT Who Should Have Been the Steelers’ 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets View Post
next year when someone out bids the steelers for lamarr woodley , you guys will be glad they took worilds.
And next year or even this year after Ben gets sacked for the umpteenth time, Mendy is downed for a loss in the backfield, and we still can't score from the red zone, I 'll remember that we don't have good tackles.
mesaSteeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum
no new posts