Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
 • Intelligent and friendly discussions.
 • It's free and it's quick. Always.
 • Enter events in the forums calendar.
 • Very user friendly software.
 • Exclusive contests and giveaways.

 Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
 Our 2013 Goal: $400.00 - To Date: $00.00 (00.00%)
 Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact Pittsburgh Steelers Forum Feed Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.

Go Back   Steelers Fever Forums > Steelers Football > Pittsburgh Steelers


Steelers Fever Fan Shop

Doc's Sports Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.

Steelers Steelers - Bills Bills
August 16th, 2014, 7:30pmET

CBS
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-26-2011, 06:29 AM   #1
mesaSteeler
A Son of Martha
Supporter
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 7,976
Gender: Male
Member Number: 10438
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Pittsburgh's unmatched success proves change isn't good

Pittsburgh's unmatched success proves change isn't good

By Clark Judge
CBSSports.com Senior Writer
Jan. 25, 2011Tell Clark your opinion!
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/1...ange-isnt-good

There is one element that separates the Pittsburgh Steelers from the field, and it's not Ben Roethlisberger, Troy Polamalu or James Harrison. Nope, it's continuity. The Steelers not only believe in it; they practice it, with more patience than most of their competitors combined.

And look where it has them: In their third Super Bowl in six seasons.

If familiarity breeds contempt, then continuity breeds success. Look at the four most successful franchises the past decade -- Indianapolis, New England, Philadelphia and Pittsburgh -- and tell me what they have in common besides franchise quarterbacks. Yep, they don't blow up their buildings at the first sign of distress.

The Colts changed head coaches once in the last nine years, and only because no one could talk Tony Dungy out of retirement. The Patriots haven't changed their head coach in more than a decade. Neither have the Eagles. And Pittsburgh? The Steelers have had two head coaches the past 19 years and three the past four decades.

By contrast, San Francisco has been through three head coaches the past two months. It also hasn't had a winning season since 2002.

Change is good ... except when it comes to the NFL. You can argue that this is a chicken-or-the-egg thing, with the question: Does success breed continuity or continuity breed success? But you cannot argue that tearing up the company's ground floor every two or three years does anything but keep a franchise in limbo.

"I'd say that success breeds continuity," said one GM. "The teams that have continuity have success, usually early in a coach's career. And if they don't, owners tend to want to blow things up -- especially the new owners, where it's all about money.

"The teams that are the most patient are small-market clubs where there's not a lot of money or teams where their owners have been in the league a long time -- and Pittsburgh is both. They [the Steelers] understand what the league is all about.

"But the new owners ... they run their franchises like they run their businesses. And when they don't have immediate success ... when they donít make a lot of money quickly ... they want to make changes. So they do it."

Exhibit A: The Washington Redskins. They went to the divisional round of the playoffs in 1999, then fired coach Norv Turner when they were sitting at 7-6 the following season. They lost two of their next three under interim coach Terry Robiskie before moving on to five head coaches -- including Hall of Famer Joe Gibbs -- with less-than-satisfactory results. During the past decade, Washington is 68-92, with just two winning seasons.

Exhibit B: The Cleveland Browns. Since returning to the NFL in 1999, they've been through five head coaches, with Eric Mangini fired this month after two seasons. The Browns went to the playoffs once and have a combined record of 64-128. I know what you're thinking: Yeah? That's why they fired those coaches. They stunk. Maybe. Except Pittsburgh didn't fire Bill Cowher after he went 7-9 and 6-10 in back-to-back seasons. Tennessee didn't fire Jeff Fisher after he went 9-23 in 2004-05, either. And Philadelphia didn't fire Andy Reid after he slumped to 6-10 in 2005.

Logic says that a club like Pittsburgh resists knee-jerk moves because, well, why change when you're winning? Good question. Except the Steelers didn't always win. They were 7-9 in 1985, 6-10 in '86, 8-7 in '87 and 5-11 in '88. Yet they never flinched, keeping Chuck Noll as their head coach. Tell me where that happens today.

In most other places coaches are on the clock. But Pittsburgh is not most places, and, yes, the Steelers have a system that finds coaches and players who fit, the best defensive coordinator on the planet and one of the sharpest GMs in the league. But, in Dan Rooney, they have an owner who gives his coaches time -- and plenty of it -- to prove themselves and shape their programs, and that support, patience and allegiance pay off.

"It's huge," said an AFC head coach, "because it creates tremendous efficiency. Everyone in the organization knows what he's looking for. The scouts. The coaches. Everyone. They all know what a Steeler player looks like, so they pick up guys that fit ... basically because everyone knows what fits. You don't have to debate and dissect a player. You look at their 20 highest-paid players, and they're all draft picks. That's no coincidence.

"As a coach, when you work for a club like the Steelers you make decisions based on what is best for the organization and the team because you know you're going be there. But when you don't, you do what you can to save your job, often making quick-fix and short-sighted decisions. That's not the way in Pittsburgh."

So we noticed. Granted, Pittsburgh doesn't pay its coaches like they do in, say, Washington or Dallas, but tell me where the security and job satisfaction are greater, the ownership is more supportive and the continuity is stronger. Tell me where there are more Lombardi Trophies, too.

Now tell me all they're not related because they are.
mesaSteeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 08:10 AM   #2
TRH
Living Legend
 
TRH's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: eastern PA
Posts: 4,391
Gender: Male
Member Number: 17206
Thanks: 98
Thanked 222 Times in 155 Posts
Default Re: Pittsburgh's unmatched success proves change isn't good

it also proves to stay away from team and clubhouse poisons such as Randy Moss, T.O., Holmes (whom we traded), Braylon Edwards, and etc types.
Funny listening to all the whiners say "sign em, sign em" when they become available as our Front Office just laughs it off and runs the other way. They don't even consider it.
TRH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 10:47 AM   #3
El Nino
Bench Warmer
 

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 367
Member Number: 17899
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Pittsburgh's unmatched success proves change isn't good

well change can be good. look at jerry jones and al davis, i doubt their teams will be any good until somehow, those guys are gone
El Nino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 10:58 AM   #4
vasteeler
Team President
 
vasteeler's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: richmond va
Posts: 2,362
Gender: Male
Member Number: 3341
Thanks: 748
Thanked 1,029 Times in 412 Posts
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: Pittsburgh's unmatched success proves change isn't good

once again thanks for the story son of martha
vasteeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 11:03 AM   #5
sarahpalinhater
Banned
 

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 458
Member Number: 17609
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Pittsburgh's unmatched success proves change isn't good

Quote:
Originally Posted by TRH View Post
it also proves to stay away from team and clubhouse poisons such as Randy Moss, T.O., Holmes (whom we traded), Braylon Edwards, and etc types.
Funny listening to all the whiners say "sign em, sign em" when they become available as our Front Office just laughs it off and runs the other way. They don't even consider it.



Being a Character, or outlandish at times is not a bad thing in and of itself. But, being a DISTRACTION is! All the players you listed are that. Santonio was not really bad per se. But, he put himself out there with his own public statements at the SB game where he said he USED to sell Marijuna as a kid out of neccessity. And said he WANTS to be a good role model for kids in the future. And then of course he gets busted with pot again later that year, gets into a public fight in a bar, and of course his twitter message of Wake & Bake! So the team really had no choice.


But really, a load " Character " type of player is fine. Just as long as he knows when it is time to go to work, you go to work.
sarahpalinhater is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum
no new posts