Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
 • Intelligent and friendly discussions.
 • It's free and it's quick. Always.
 • Enter events in the forums calendar.
 • Very user friendly software.
 • Exclusive contests and giveaways.

 Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
 Our 2013 Goal: $400.00 - To Date: $00.00 (00.00%)
 Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact Pittsburgh Steelers Forum Feed Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.

Go Back   Steelers Fever Forums > Steelers Football > Steelers Draft Central > ** The War Room 2012 **


Steelers Fever Fan Shop

Doc's Sports Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.

Steelers Steelers - Bills Bills
August 16th, 2014, 7:30pmET

CBS
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-30-2006, 06:10 PM   #1
tony hipchest
IRONMAN a.k.a. Tony Stark
 
tony hipchest's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Give me back my game...
Posts: 38,445
Member Number: 658
Thanks: 1,588
Thanked 6,624 Times in 2,869 Posts
Default disappointed with this years draft?

just remember there arent many rookies who are realisticly gonna make this team. steelers drafted the players they felt would most likely be able to just make the team. if that means their might be a 3rd string te spot open, then thats who they drafted. we didnt go into this draft looking for future stars, although we may have landed a long term starter in s. holmes. we addressed our needs. we were not drafting for the future and we werent reaching to fill any gaping holes. we were drafting to maintain a sb calibur team. with the core of our team we dont need any 2006 rookies to lead us into the future.

all starters were in place for next year before this draft. leave it to the steelers to keep last years sb winning squad together for the next few years. im happy with that.
tony hipchest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2006, 06:15 PM   #2
Volpe1564
Bench Warmer
 

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland, OR now, but from Monroeville, Pa
Posts: 168
Gender: Male
Member Number: 397
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: disappointed with this years draft?

i guess you right bro but y not back up the FB and not 3rd TE??? maybe thats what they were thinking...lol...who am i? i dont know anything.lol
__________________

dont like my politics?? dont voice yours and i will not voice mine
Volpe1564 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2006, 06:19 PM   #3
tony hipchest
IRONMAN a.k.a. Tony Stark
 
tony hipchest's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Give me back my game...
Posts: 38,445
Member Number: 658
Thanks: 1,588
Thanked 6,624 Times in 2,869 Posts
Default Re: disappointed with this years draft?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Volpe1564
i guess you right bro but y not back up the FB and not 3rd TE??? maybe thats what they were thinking...lol...who am i? i dont know anything.lol
c. humes is projected by many to be a fb and dan kreider was an undrafted f.a. if we need a back up for him we will pick him up off the street. (we already got his back up on the practice squad) a drafted fb would probably never make the team. a 3rd te just might. like i said they drafted for players most likely to make the team.
tony hipchest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2006, 06:20 PM   #4
nwksteeler
Draft Prospect
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 68
Gender: Male
Member Number: 2304
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: disappointed with this years draft?

This was definitely a good draft and by season's end a great draft. Some needs were definitely addressed. Although I would have liked more secondary help late(Antoine Bethea) maybe they will address that via rookie free agents. Good draft!
nwksteeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2006, 06:21 PM   #5
Atlanta Dan
Resigned
Supporter
 
Atlanta Dan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,236
Member Number: 728
Thanks: 1,923
Thanked 6,081 Times in 2,799 Posts
Default Re: disappointed with this years draft?

I have been jammed up at work and have not followed the draft closely, but other than moving up in the first round to draft a WR I am not overwhelmed by the decisions made this weekend. Specifically, the tactic of trading out of the second round, drafting another small WR, and not drafting or trading for LB or RB depth until round 7 appears odd. Hopefully the Anthony Smith pick at safety works out.

I am not saying Cowher does not care about the long term since he may soon be taking a break, but if ever there was a draft that was specifically designed to fill holes for 2006 but not to address long term needs this appears to be such a draft.
Atlanta Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2006, 06:26 PM   #6
desertsteel
Assistant Coach
 
desertsteel's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,092
Gender: Male
Member Number: 915
Thanks: 175
Thanked 407 Times in 213 Posts
Default Re: disappointed with this years draft?

I'm happy. Splashy move with SH. Then some guys that have a chance to make the team and contribute on special teams. I look forward to seeing the FA's we pick up...
desertsteel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2006, 06:28 PM   #7
tony hipchest
IRONMAN a.k.a. Tony Stark
 
tony hipchest's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Give me back my game...
Posts: 38,445
Member Number: 658
Thanks: 1,588
Thanked 6,624 Times in 2,869 Posts
Default Re: disappointed with this years draft?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta Dan
I have been jammed up at work and have not followed the draft closely, but other than moving up in the first round to draft a WR I am not overwhelmed by the decisions made this weekend. Specifically, the tactic of trading out of the second round, drafting another small WR, and not drafting or trading for LB or RB depth until round 7 appears odd. Hopefully the Anthony Smith pick at safety works out.

I am not saying Cowher does not care about the long term since he may soon be taking a break, but if ever there was a draft that was specifically designed to fill holes for 2006 but not to address long term needs this appears to be such a draft.
with further increases in the salary cap i see the steelers working to retain the improving, young, sb talent they already have in place. if we lose a co-ordinator or 2 we wont have it compounded with multiple starters leaving. the steelers didnt try to fix anything that wasnt broke. what really needed to be adressed was. i like the vote of confidence and shot in the arm that was given to ben and willie and the lb corps
tony hipchest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2006, 06:30 PM   #8
BCEDGE
Water Boy
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 28
Gender: Male
Member Number: 2197
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: disappointed with this years draft?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta Dan
I have been jammed up at work and have not followed the draft closely, but other than moving up in the first round to draft a WR I am not overwhelmed by the decisions made this weekend. Specifically, the tactic of trading out of the second round, drafting another small WR, and not drafting or trading for LB or RB depth until round 7 appears odd. Hopefully the Anthony Smith pick at safety works out.

I am not saying Cowher does not care about the long term since he may soon be taking a break, but if ever there was a draft that was specifically designed to fill holes for 2006 but not to address long term needs this appears to be such a draft.
Actually both trading up and trading down were brilliant and did nothing but cost us a 4th round pick. For the second they picked up two thrids...and still filled the position they were seeking to fill. And to move up and get the guy you want in Holmes, was fantastic. The whole idea that these cannot be long term answers is simply baffling. They had an unsexy but very productive draft.
__________________
If you think the Steelers won the Super Bowl because of the officials...you are nothing but a jealous pathetic idiot. They won because they were better...nothing more nothing less. I am sorry your team wasn't good enough.
BCEDGE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2006, 01:36 AM   #9
Koopa
Living Legend
 
Koopa's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Third Coast Born, That Mean I'm Texas Raised
Posts: 3,439
Gender: Male
Member Number: 508
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: disappointed with this years draft?

i liked this draft, i'm really happy about holmes, i like the pick of willie reed because we got our punt returner, sure holmes could do that, but i rather him just focus on being our number 2 wr. not sure about the saftey but he seems like a good pick up for depth. omar jacob i was huh??? but i don't know if he's gonna stay a qb or not, but he could be a really good back up for us (he's already 49032751923572945749 times better then maddox). the dude from the U might be a good pick up, adds depth up front. i don't know about the tight end. but i love the pick of humes with the 7th pick. so all in all i'm very happy with what we did these last two days now on to back to back superbowl victories
Koopa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2006, 01:50 AM   #10
BigSteelThrill
Bench Warmer
 
BigSteelThrill's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 156
Member Number: 818
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: disappointed with this years draft?

This draft was money.


BigSteelThrill is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum
no new posts