A little weed costs us a Super Bowl

Originally Posted by thumper

OK, I believe you have just broken rules for this message board.
There are to be no personal attacks. You just broke this rule. Either
apologize or risk risk a temporary ban. Mods please note.

Thumper, I wouldn't be so quick to call people out for making personal attacks. What do they say about people who live in glass houses? Just saying.

[davidtrout]

Originally Posted by Wallace108

Thumper, I wouldn't be so quick to call people out for making personal attacks. What do they say about people who live in glass houses? Just saying.

I've had thumpy on my ignore list for quite a while now. It's made this board much more enjoyable to read.

[thumper]

Originally Posted by Wallace108

Thumper, I wouldn't be so quick to call people out for making personal attacks. What do they say about people who live in glass houses? Just saying.

Are you going to resort to personal attacks too? Careful

Originally Posted by davidtrout

I've had thumpy on my ignore list for quite a while now. It's made this board much more enjoyable to read.

Thumper is OK. He keeps things interesting, especially during a lockout.

Originally Posted by thumper

Are you going to resort to personal attacks too? Careful

When did I resort to a personal attack? I was just pointing out that you make personal attacks all the time. It was comical to see YOU accuse Zu of making a personal attack. And quite honestly, it isn't me who needs to be careful.

[ConvertedSteelersFan]

nothing wrong with the occasional toke

[bornaSteelersfan]

The problem with Santonio was/is that he seems to think don't apply to him. He thinks it is OK to smoke weed , beat up girls , or throw a drink in a woman's face that cuts her. He couldn't even make it to the Jets without an altercation on an airplane .

There is no "I" in team, but there is an M and an E if you can reverse the ME.

Furthermore, you cannot have a TEAM without T & A...BRING ON THE NAKED CHEERLEADERS!

[zulater]

Originally Posted by thumper

I am embarrassed for you. Sad thing is, you have no clue how sad
your attempt at debate is. No idea.

And I'm embarrased that you call yourself a Steeler fan. I mean really , first off you cry like a lttle girl trying to get me banned or suspended.

Then you basically assert, while offering no proof, that the Rooney's are murderers and further compare them to Stalin.....



If a mod feels the need to ban or suspend me for pointing out how moronic it is for anyone to assert the Steelers as a team have no right to dismiss Holmes on character issues due to their supposed "degenerate" owership, then have at me, because I'm taking back nothing.

[thumper]

And I'm embarrased that you call yourself a Steeler fan. I mean really , first off you cry like a lttle girl trying to get me banned or suspended.

Cry? I accurately detailed your breaking of forum rules. If one is going
to bother making rules, I am assuming the said rules would be followed.
If not, why bother to make them?

Then you basically assert, while offering no proof, that the Rooney's are murderers and further compare them to Stalin.....

I asserted no such thing. You claimed that since Rooneys were never
arrested for anything it proved their lily white history while I provided
examples of others who have never been arrested for anything yet were
clearly criminal regardless. Big difference. The fact that you can't discern
the difference is a clear indication of low-level, single-plain thinking.

If a mod feels the need to ban or suspend me for pointing out how moronic it is for anyone to assert the Steelers as a team have no right to dismiss Holmes on character issues due to their supposed "degenerate" owership, then have at me, because I'm taking back nothing.

The mods will probably take pity on you because it is clear that you lack
the ability to perceive things accurately. Your above assertion is yet another
straw man argument, where you try to strike at assertions that were never
made. I never indicated that the Steelers had no "right" to dump Holmes,
ever. (Go back and read the whole thread and you should blush in
embarrassment as you will see that assertion was never made.) I merely
indicated that dumping him over some hippie lettuce may have caused us
another ring. Show me where I said they had "no right" to get rid of him. (If
I wait for you to do so, I will die sitting here of old age, as no such assertion
was ever made.)

Please try to react to assertions that were actually made, as opposed to
assuming what they are and reacting to them in an inaccurate manner. Anyone
can strike down a straw man argument. Offering knee-jerk reactions to things
that were never asserted showcases a faulty thought model. You will find
life is far more forgiving if you perceive things accurately and then react
accordingly. Huffing and puffing, gnashing teeth and howling at the moon
just creates lots of unproductive energy leaks. Take a breath and try to
apply this logical approach where one deals with the truth, not just barks
at trucks going down the road, mindlessly. I think you will find a colossal
upgrade in your quality of life.

[thumper]

Originally Posted by bornaSteelersfan

The problem with Santonio was/is that he seems to think don't apply to him. He thinks it is OK to smoke weed , beat up girls , or throw a drink in a woman's face that cuts her. He couldn't even make it to the Jets without an altercation on an airplane .

There is no "I" in team, but there is an M and an E if you can reverse the ME.

Furthermore, you cannot have a TEAM without T & A...BRING ON THE NAKED CHEERLEADERS!

[Big]

Originally Posted by thumper

I still can't remove myself from the fact that if Holmes was
on the team and on the field that last drive in the SB, Pgh wins
the game. That last drive looked horrible, with the WRs not knowing
where they were supposed to be - very herky jerky. So Rooneys dump
Holmes for a warm six-pack over some weed. Mean while, they suck
down scotches but somehow puffing some weed is worse.

Yea, it's over. Time to move on, but it still burns me that Holmes was
sent packing over some weed. There hasn't been a single instance
where they proved weed was even bad for you, yet they have found
evidence that it can be beneficial. Not a single death has been
attributed to weed, yet how many ppl die from booze every single year
in accidents alone?

Yea, it's illegal. So is having oral sex in some states. Does that make
it right?

I am glad their paranoia and pointing the dirty end of the stick at
Holmes cost us a SB. Great.

He didnt get cut for smoking weed. He was cut because he was caught smoking weed for the 2nd time by the police, going to be suspended for 4 games and Ben was already bringing enough negative energy our way. If he didnt get caught, he'd still be a Steeler. It's hard getting caught smoking weed, you almost have to be stupid.