Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
 • Intelligent and friendly discussions.
 • It's free and it's quick. Always.
 • Enter events in the forums calendar.
 • Very user friendly software.
 • Exclusive contests and giveaways.

 Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
 Our 2014 Goal: $450.00 - To Date: $450.00 (100.00%)
 Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact Pittsburgh Steelers Forum Feed Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.

Go Back   Steelers Fever Forums > Steelers Football > Pittsburgh Steelers


Steelers Fever Fan Shop

Doc's Sports Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.

Steelers Fever Presents...

Steelers Panthers

GAMEDAY
Sunday, September 21, 8:30 PM
NBC
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-02-2011, 01:05 AM   #1
tony hipchest
IRONMAN a.k.a. Tony Stark
 
tony hipchest's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Give me back my game...
Posts: 39,257
Member Number: 658
Thanks: 1,905
Thanked 8,194 Times in 3,490 Posts
Default After further review … (Steelers vs. Patriots)

my current favorite postgame tape review from mark kaboly of the tribune-

http://blog.triblive.com/steel-mill/...t9HQwA.twitter

Quote:
Taking a look back at the Steelers-Patriots game on my DVR.

We all are quick to give credit to Dick LeBeau and the Steelers’ defense on what he was able to do to bring the great Tom Brady to his knees, and deservedly so.

To totally flip the script and go almost exclusively press man with a deep safety to protect the deep ball was absolute genius by LeBeau.

It forced Brady to do a pre-snap read and stick with it rather than go through his progression to find the open receiver, which we all knew Brady is deadly doing.

Looking back on it now, it was brilliance because the Patriots really don’t have much talent on offense other than Brady and a couple of tight ends.

Even though LeBeau’s plan was flawless, Bruce Arians’ game plan was even better.

The Steelers’ offense have been predicated on throwing the ball deep to make splash plays and get quick scores.
Quote:
All in all, Taylor lined up across Welker and play straight man-to-man coverage on 37 of 57 plays.

Here’s the updated Taylor catch allowed list at the midway point:

Wes Welker, New England 4-23 yards
Larry Fitzgerald, Arizona 3-58 yards
Andre Johnson, Houston 3-23 yards
Nate Washington, Tennessee 2-11 yards
Rob Housler, Arizona 1-20 yards
Jason Hill, Jacksonville 1-18 yards, TD
Reggie Wayne, Indianapolis 1-11 yards
Deion Branch, New England 1-10 yards
Mike Williams, Seattle 1-9 yards
Damian Williams, Tennessee 1-8 yards
Mike Thomas, Jacksonville 1-3 yards
Pierre Garcon, Indianapolis 1-(-2) yards

* Arians finally decided to run some to the left against the Patriots.
see link for many more great tidbits.
__________________
tony hipchest is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 02:04 AM   #2
ricardisimo
Administrator
 
ricardisimo's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Lalaland
Posts: 5,434
Gender: Male
Member Number: 15369
Thanks: 321
Thanked 879 Times in 425 Posts
Default Re: After further review … (Steelers vs. Patriots)

Great read. Not so sure that Gronk "clearly scored", but I agree with him that "Joey Porter was a non-factor".
__________________
Why does God hate amputees?
ricardisimo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 02:13 AM   #3
tony hipchest
IRONMAN a.k.a. Tony Stark
 
tony hipchest's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Give me back my game...
Posts: 39,257
Member Number: 658
Thanks: 1,905
Thanked 8,194 Times in 3,490 Posts
Default Re: After further review … (Steelers vs. Patriots)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardisimo View Post
Great read. Not so sure that Gronk "clearly scored", but I agree with him that "Joey Porter was a non-factor".
and he has kemo with "too many dumb mistakes". i only counted one. i guess some things just cary over, from week to week.

i notice stevenson sylverster was the only player he gave a grade below a "B". i guess that is to be expected, being he is light (several seasons) away from farriors contribution level.

i think some people forget how high farrior was drafted by the jets, and how highly he is regarded by the staff, his teammates, and the rest of the league.

i do think pornkowski was in. if i easilly accept s. holmes game winning rec vs the ravens a few years back, i do the same with the opposition. the ball was caught more than half way beyond the front of the stripe.
__________________
tony hipchest is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 01:07 PM   #4
desertsteel
Assistant Coach
 
desertsteel's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,205
Gender: Male
Member Number: 915
Thanks: 200
Thanked 502 Times in 267 Posts
Default Re: After further review … (Steelers vs. Patriots)

Quote:
Originally Posted by tony hipchest View Post
i do think pornkowski was in. if i easilly accept s. holmes game winning rec vs the ravens a few years back, i do the same with the opposition. the ball was caught more than half way beyond the front of the stripe.
Patriots coaches saw the same replays that we did. If he was in then it's on the Pats staff for not challenging.
desertsteel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 01:20 PM   #5
steelerchad
Team President
Supporter
 

Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,164
Member Number: 5792
Thanks: 7
Thanked 333 Times in 163 Posts
Default Re: After further review … (Steelers vs. Patriots)

Quote:
Originally Posted by tony hipchest View Post
and he has kemo with "too many dumb mistakes". i only counted one. i guess some things just cary over, from week to week.

i notice stevenson sylverster was the only player he gave a grade below a "B". i guess that is to be expected, being he is light (several seasons) away from farriors contribution level.

i think some people forget how high farrior was drafted by the jets, and how highly he is regarded by the staff, his teammates, and the rest of the league.

i do think pornkowski was in. if i easilly accept s. holmes game winning rec vs the ravens a few years back, i do the same with the opposition. the ball was caught more than half way beyond the front of the stripe.
He was in. Even moreso than Santonio's imo. They can cry about that call if they'd like, but it didn't change the fact that they got outplayed in all aspects and deserved to lose that game. I seriouly doubt that call changes the outcome. Even if we only had 30 seconds and 50 yards to go to get into FG range, their D couldn't stop us all day.
steelerchad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 02:15 PM   #6
tony hipchest
IRONMAN a.k.a. Tony Stark
 
tony hipchest's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Give me back my game...
Posts: 39,257
Member Number: 658
Thanks: 1,905
Thanked 8,194 Times in 3,490 Posts
Default Re: After further review … (Steelers vs. Patriots)

Quote:
Originally Posted by phillysteel View Post
Patriots coaches saw the same replays that we did.


you would think, but the article in cited in the original post suggests otherwise.

definitely the patriots fault though. im not gonna cry for them, but im also not gonna pretend to be blind.

* The Patriots sure did screw up late when Gronkowski clearly scored, but the line judge marked the ball at the 1-yard line.

Belichick said he didn’t see a replay and couldn’t make the challenge with the information he had.

Reason for that was that the Patriots went right to the line thus preventing CBS to show a replay.

What made it worse was that Brady took the full 40 seconds to run the play. If he would’ve huddled up, a replay would’ve been shown.

Blame Brady on this one, he needs to know better.

__________________
tony hipchest is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 06:18 PM   #7
BKAnthem
Assistant Coach
 

Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,086
Member Number: 13149
Thanks: 359
Thanked 168 Times in 117 Posts
Default Re: After further review … (Steelers vs. Patriots)

Quote:
Originally Posted by tony hipchest View Post
and he has kemo with "too many dumb mistakes". i only counted one. i guess some things just cary over, from week to week.

i notice stevenson sylverster was the only player he gave a grade below a "B". i guess that is to be expected, being he is light (several seasons) away from farriors contribution level.

i think some people forget how high farrior was drafted by the jets, and how highly he is regarded by the staff, his teammates, and the rest of the league.

i do think pornkowski was in. if i easilly accept s. holmes game winning rec vs the ravens a few years back, i do the same with the opposition. the ball was caught more than half way beyond the front of the stripe.
When he was a FA i was praying the Steelers would scoop him up and they did
BKAnthem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 09:12 PM   #8
Yehoodi
Water Boy
 
Yehoodi's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 38
Member Number: 19054
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: After further review … (Steelers vs. Patriots)

Quote:
Originally Posted by tony hipchest View Post
and he has kemo with "too many dumb mistakes". i only counted one. i guess some things just cary over, from week to week.

i notice stevenson sylverster was the only player he gave a grade below a "B". i guess that is to be expected, being he is light (several seasons) away from farriors contribution level.

i think some people forget how high farrior was drafted by the jets, and how highly he is regarded by the staff, his teammates, and the rest of the league.

i do think pornkowski was in. if i easilly accept s. holmes game winning rec vs the ravens a few years back, i do the same with the opposition. the ball was caught more than half way beyond the front of the stripe.
Good article, thanks for posting . . .

First off, i think the steelers dominated pretty much the entire game . . . in some ways i kind of reminded me of SB 42, the other team on the field and we can not score . .. of coarse the steelers O was much better than the Gmen O in SB 42 . . .

I do think that Gronk was in on that TD and too bad it was not called a TD . . . given the auto ruling it would be nice to almost have the refs erred on the side of calling the guy in and then can fix it on replay, absent of coarse the presumption in replay would be that he was in . . .

as for challenging it, i think a few things on that matter . . . BB loves to use situational football during the week and does it mainly to get his players prep for a number of situations in the game, and if they occur, you are more comfortable with the situation and more importantingly, one will know off the top of your head what play to call without having to think and decide with a milliions of things going on in game . . .

. . . to a degree wish we had that here . . . it was kind of a combinations of things . . . BB did not know if he got in, did not see if from his spot, did not have a replay; TB on the other hand was running the no huddle and I think he waited and held the ball hoping for a replay which never came, understandable as there was no replay due to the O being in no huddle, it all sounds so easy now, the next day . . . furture reference the sitational football move would of been to stay in the huddle and wait for a replay . ..perhaps TB wanted to get to the line to quick snap a play to punch it in, did not like what he saw then held up waiting for replay . . . there are number of things that did not go very well, too bad BB did not simply challenge it, true he might of lost a TO, which would be like 35 seconds, but the true loss is the 35 seconds minus the time save for the pats to run that play, so it might of been only a lost of say 15 or 20 seconds . . .

. . . as with some plays, they can have an impact on the game, and i think that TD did, had Gronk got in, there is 4 mins to go as opposed to 2:35, so we probably kick off and whose knows what happens . . . down by only 6 . . .

Great game for Pitts, I guess the only thing one might say as a downer is that the Steelers pretty much outplayed a AFC rvial for 50 mins and yet near the end had the ball and only leading by 6 . . . essentially Pitt brought its A+ game but only won by 6 points, other than this point is pretty much a solid confidence builder for the Steelers . . . and great game by Big Ben and the Pitt O . . . and of coarse now they hold the tiebreaker aganst the Pats . . . perhaps the most important part of Sunday's win. . . .
Yehoodi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 11:01 PM   #9
madtowndrunkard
Team Captain
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 920
Member Number: 11280
Thanks: 1
Thanked 94 Times in 53 Posts
Default Re: After further review … (Steelers vs. Patriots)

I'll be the first guy to say Dick Lebeau is a defensive genius.

But WHY was it so shocking and amazing that we played press coverage against the Patriots? I mean lets be honest... HOW many of you have been saying for years " WHY THE F$%& ARE WE GIVING 5-10 yard cushins to the Pats WR's? WHY do we insist on only playing zone, when Brady has proven game after game that he can pick it apart with ease?

When I saw our DB's up on the LOS, I was like "ABOUT TIME!" Why let a finesse QB who destroys zone coverage get comfortable with his timing? Brady and their WR's were clearly frustrated. All you need to do is slow that offense down and you can beat them. I want to know why it took us this long to try this?
madtowndrunkard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 11:22 PM   #10
tony hipchest
IRONMAN a.k.a. Tony Stark
 
tony hipchest's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Give me back my game...
Posts: 39,257
Member Number: 658
Thanks: 1,905
Thanked 8,194 Times in 3,490 Posts
Default Re: After further review … (Steelers vs. Patriots)

Quote:
Originally Posted by madtowndrunkard View Post
I'll be the first guy to say Dick Lebeau is a defensive genius.

But WHY was it so shocking and amazing that we played press coverage against the Patriots? I mean lets be honest... HOW many of you have been saying for years " WHY THE F$%& ARE WE GIVING 5-10 yard cushins to the Pats WR's? WHY do we insist on only playing zone, when Brady has proven game after game that he can pick it apart with ease?

When I saw our DB's up on the LOS, I was like "ABOUT TIME!" Why let a finesse QB who destroys zone coverage get comfortable with his timing? Brady and their WR's were clearly frustrated. All you need to do is slow that offense down and you can beat them. I want to know why it took us this long to try this?
lebeaus zone blitz scheme is much more effective when we dont spot the opposition 21 points off of TO's.

his scheme was just fine in 2004, and 2005 (when randle el gave them the game) plus it destroyed matt cassell.

his scheme was designed to slow down the likes of joe montana (which brady is). kinda ironic out of san francisco's 5 SB's the only ones worth watching where it was even close was the 2 vs the bungles of all teams (with lebeau on the staff).

he gave them fits.

the system usually works. what lebeau proved is even at the ripe old age of 70+ he isnt unwilling to adapt and evolve.

important to note that brady and moss were scorching press coverage in 07.
__________________
tony hipchest is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum
no new posts