Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
 • Intelligent and friendly discussions.
 • It's free and it's quick. Always.
 • Enter events in the forums calendar.
 • Very user friendly software.
 • Exclusive contests and giveaways.

 Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
 Our 2014 Goal: $450.00 - To Date: $450.00 (100.00%)
 Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact Pittsburgh Steelers Forum Feed Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.

Go Back   Steelers Fever Forums > Steelers Football > Pittsburgh Steelers

Steelers Fever Fan Shop

Doc's Sports Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.

Pro Bowl
8:00PM Eastern on ESPN

Thread Tools
Old 05-31-2006, 10:41 AM   #1
Assistant Coach

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Land of Sand.....
Posts: 1,114
Gender: Male
Member Number: 1031
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Sizing up the defense.....

How good was the Pittsburgh Steelers' defense in 2005? The rankings say they were the fourth best unit in the league, but blogger Ryan Wilson takes a closer look at the unit, in particular the front seven in this installment.

I spend more time than I care to admit scouring the web looking for stuff to write about, especially this time of year. Well, like manna from heaven -- or maybe, like a two-by-four to the back of the head -- I found my angle: Jim Wexell's column on James Farrior and this thread discussing the state of the Pittsburgh Steelers' defense. So that's what I'll do. Today I'll look at the front seven and in the next week or so, I'll discuss the secondary. It'll be just like Ghost Hunters, but instead of ghosts it'll be Pittsburgh's defense. Okay, so it's nothing like Ghost Hunters. Anyway ?

Before we get started, a little refresher: I've mentioned before that I also write for Football Outsiders. The site started, in part, because Aaron Schatz wanted to see if the old football axiom, "You have to run the ball to be successful," was actually true. (It's not.) Four years and a crapload of play-by-play and game-charting data later, we have all kind of measures for how good or bad a team is compared to every other team in the league. I'll save you the math class, but I'll use some of the stats here to support my points (and if you're a glutton for punishment, here's a quick overview of all the gory details). Let's get to it.

First things first: Pittsburgh's defense was better in 2005 than it was in 2004. On a play-by-play basis, the Steelers ranked third in the league in total defense last season (eighth against the pass, second against the run); in 2004, they ranked fourth (third against the pass, sixth against the run). No, Farrior didn't put up numbers like he did in 2004, but that was his best season ever in the NFL. Plus, guys like Troy Polamalu and Ike Taylor more than made up for it.

And yes, Pittsburgh's defense had a knack for starting games very slowly (the Cincy game at home comes to mind), but on a play-by-play basis ? and I'm sure this will shock some people ? the Steelers were the third best defense in the NFL in the first half; in the second half, they were eighth best. And because I know you're skeptical, here's the breakdown by half for the top-10 defenses in 2005:

Team 1st half 2nd half
CHI 1st 1st
WAS 2nd 7th
PIT 3rd 8th
TB 4th 15th
DEN 5th 11th
KC 6th 20th
BAL 7th 10th
NYG 8th 12th
IND 9th 6th
JAC 10th 4th
Historically, defensive performance is quite variable from one year to the next, but given Pittsburgh's low roster turnover, I don't expect much drop-off.

Along the defensive line DE Aaron Smith and NT Casey Hampton return, but DE Kimo von Oelhoffen is now in New York. Brett Keisel replaces him, with Travis Kirschke and Rodney Bailey (at least for now) providing depth. At linebacker, we've got Joey Porter and Clark Haggans on the outside with Farrior and Larry Foote on the inside.

How good was this unit in 2005? Well, they were fourth in Adjusted Line Yards. ALY is a defensive front seven statistic that represents the performance of offensive lines against each defense, adjusted for the quality of offensive opponents. In English, the Steelers' front seven only allowed 3.66 yards per running play, when accounting for the quality of the offense. In 2004, Pittsburgh ranked first (3.38 yards). So technically, yes, the run-defense isn't what it once was, but that's kinda like saying the Steelers weren't as good in 2005 as they were in 2004 because they only won 11 regular season games.

The Front Three So what can we expect in 2006, with Kimo out and Keisel in? Last season, with the help of volunteer readers, Football Outsiders game-charted almost every NFL regular season game to get even more data on individual players, team tendencies, and a bunch of other interesting stuff. We put most of the findings in our book, Pro Football Prospectus 2006. Shipping this summer!

Sure, it's a shameless plug, but I'll spill the beans here on a few of the Steelers for the sake of discussion:

We know what Hampton and Smith can do, but what about Keisel? Last season, von Oelhoffen had a Stop Rate of 92 percent, which ranked fourth in the NFL among defensive linemen. (Basically, Stop Rate measures how often a player "stops" the ball-carrier from gaining 45 percent of needed yards on first down; 60 percent of needed yards on second down; and on third or fourth down, simply preventing a new first down.) Smith's Stop Rate was 86 percent ? good for 18th in the league. Keisel, in limited playing time, had a Stop Rate of 85 percent. None of this is particularly earth-shattering ? many people suspected as much based on what they're eyes were telling them last season ? but now at least we have some context. Keisel is known as a pass-rushing demon, but he was surprisingly effective against the run too.

Now if the Steelers had instead opted to obtain Orpheus Roye from the Browns to replace Kimo, then you would be well within your rights to demand that everybody in Pittsburgh's front office be drug-tested. In Cleveland's 3-4 scheme last season, Roye mustered an 81 percent Stop Rate, good for 31st in the league. Ouch. If last year's performance is any indication, Keisel shouldn't be much of a drop-off.

The Linebackers I couldn't disagree with Wex's story about Farrior falling back to earth last season, especially after looking up his game-charting stats. Farrior certainly didn't have a bad year, it was just a departure from 2004. According to the game-charting data, on passing plays, Farrior made his average stop 6.4 yards past the line of scrimmage, good for 72nd in the league among linebackers. (Note: passing plays also include sacks). On running plays, Farrior made his average stop 2.4 yards past the line of scrimmage, which ranked 12th.

Here's a table for the rest of the linebackers:

Name PassStop (rank) RunStop (rank)
J. Farrior 6.4 (72nd) 2.4 (12th)
L. Foote 5.2 (39th) 2.9 (41st)
J. Harrison 3.4 ( -- ) -0.1 ( -- )
C. Haggans 3.7 (18th) 2.4 (15th)
J. Porter 0.2 (4th ) 3.3 (62nd)
Some thoughts:

Foote's numbers aren't spectacular, but the fact that they are virtually identical to Odell Thurman's should raise some eyebrows. And because I love giving Ray Lewis the business, consider his craptacular numbers from last season: Passing plays - average stop 9.3 yards past the line of scrimmage ? good for 113th in the league; running plays - average stop 4.0 yards past the line of scrimmage, which ranked 95th. And this guy wants a raise. Jeebus. Yeah, I'll take Foote.

In limited playing time, James Harrison racked up some pretty impressive numbers. It's worth noting that these totals are while he played outside linebacker. Just keep that in mind as you continue to pimp him for Foote's job on the inside.

Haggans and Porter are good and unbelievable, respectively, against the pass, but most of that has to do with the number of quarterback sacks than with either player being particularly good in coverage. Haggans fares better than Porter against the run, but Porter does lines up opposite the left tackle, usually the opposing team's best offensive lineman. (In the Super Bowl, Dick LeBeau wisely dropped Porter back into coverage more than usual, instead of letting Walter Jones get his big mitts on him, effectively taking him out of the play.) Of course, Haggans plays on the strong side, meaning that he has to deal with the right tackle and a tight end on most occasions.
So what does all this mean? For the last two seasons, the Steelers' defense has been among the best in the league. And given they only lost two starters, it's reasonable to think they'll continue to play well. No, Brett Keisel isn't as good against the run as Kimo von Oelhoffen, but he's a lot better than I originally thought.

The linebackers are solid, and even though Foote doesn't remind anybody of Kendrell Bell (and to me, that's not necessarily a bad thing), he's a very good at his job, knows his responsibilities, plays smart and is seldom out of position.

Remember, things could be a lot worse. In the next week or so I'll take a look at the secondary.

By: Ryan Wilson
Date: May 24, 2006

DIESELMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 11:19 AM   #2
Draft Prospect
GoFor6's Avatar

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sewickley
Posts: 78
Gender: Male
Member Number: 2352
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Sizing up the defense.....

Great job - looking forward to the next installment.
I still like Nate
Can't wait to play the Ben-Jailed!
GoFor6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 12:02 PM   #3
Water Boy

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Somerville, MA
Posts: 14
Gender: Male
Member Number: 2382
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Sizing up the defense.....

Great posting, many thanks for the insights. Love the stats on Ray Lewis.

I've been wondering a bit about Kiesel. Yes, he's smaller than you'd like as a 3-4 end, but he's also way quicker than the average bookend. Given our commitment to zone-blitz principles, it's possible to imagine Dr. LeBeau dropping Kiesel into coverage with much greater regularity than he has with other ends. This may be especially true on third down situations, where Kiesel may be more like a very large linebacker, and give us a look more like the 2-5 that the Pats use a lot on 3rd down and we started to use a bit last year.

That being said, I don't expect Kiesel to be able to hold up against the run as an every down player, and I don't think of either Bailey or Kirschke as being strong run stuffers, either. Any word on how Nua is progressing?

And I'm still worried about our depth at LB.

Any thoughts?


sculleyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 12:44 PM   #4

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 559
Gender: Male
Member Number: 2231
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Sizing up the defense.....

Great Post....
I think the loss of Kimo will hurt us a heckuva lot more than people think. Randle El was a guy that had little responsibility and it will not be hard to find someone that can produce 30 to 40 catches and less than 5 TD's.... Kimo on the other hand was a critical part of our defense on the field and in the lockeroom.

Kiesel at first glance is the obvious choice to get the first crack at Kimo's spot.... I personally think he will do just fine... I fully agree, however, with the statement made questioning his ability to hold up in a full season as a run stuffing DE in the 3-4. He definitely brings a much better pass rush than Kimo but we may have to utilize our depth with a much stricter rotation at the e down lineman spots. I love the idea of Kiesel dropping back into zone coverage on 3rd and 7-10....

Chris Hoke was a godsend in 04.... he filled in for an injured Casey Hampton and filled in very well... we saw very little of him in 05 however.... it might be time to let Hoke roam around a bit.... I would like to see him play a little at the end spot on running downs...

I dont expect much from Bailey or Kirschke.... My interest is peaked by Orien Harris. Our 4th rounder out of "the U" is a guy who I think can help this team along the D-line... He also is a guy who I think could play DT and DE in our 3-4... We have had guys in the past play DT and DE and it might be time to do it again.
coachspeak33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 01:32 PM   #5
lamberts-lost-tooth's Avatar

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Midwest
Posts: 10,829
Gender: Male
Member Number: 2363
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Sizing up the defense.....

Excellent post!!
However lets not forget that Defensive rankings are rather arbitrary. For instance.. Chicago had excellent numbers but played in the weakest division in the league,...Detroit, Greenbay, and Minnesota twice apiece. Add to those padded numbers the fact that they played in a sub-par NFC. The obvious bloated numbers and actual meddle of their defense became shamefully apparant when they played and were torched by a Panthers team that was not stellar by any means.
How would their defense held up against Cincy/Indy/Denver? Now take into consideration that teams that had the ability to score in the first few quarters were able to play prevent defense and not worry as much about the ground game. In fact they HOPE that teams continue to run so as to eat up the clock. This ADDS numbers to better defenses.
All this of course doesnt take away from your post and the incredible detail that you went into...You gave excellent stats and helped relieve some our "Kiesel" anxiety
lamberts-lost-tooth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 01:43 PM   #6
Bench Warmer
BigSteelThrill's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 156
Member Number: 818
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Sizing up the defense.....

What a damn good read that was. Rep+
Thank you.
BigSteelThrill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 03:14 PM   #7
Water Boy

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Round Rock Teaxas just north of Austin
Posts: 27
Gender: Male
Member Number: 2351
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Sizing up the defense.....

I agree !! What a great read !! The D will be better this year. More maturity, especially in the secondary. Harrison is a good replacement at outside linebacker and our D line will be fine. Can't wait !!
burgsville is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 06:23 PM   #8
Suitanim's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio
Posts: 6,086
Gender: Male
Member Number: 591
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Sizing up the defense.....

GREAT find! As for depth, we are 3 deep at LB, so no worries (and, yes, I know we won't carry 12 linebackers).
Suitanim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2006, 06:52 PM   #9
Living Legend
clevestinks's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,326
Member Number: 302
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Sizing up the defense.....

Awesome read rep worthy
clevestinks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2006, 01:55 AM   #10
William Munney
Water Boy
William Munney's Avatar

Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 35
Member Number: 2379
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Sizing up the defense.....

Good post. I think our secondary is one of the best. Sure beats Chard Scott and Burnt Alexander. I'm wondering about the linebackers getting close to 30. Can they still carry the load. The Steelers need depth to give these guys a spell. Can Wallace, Harrison, and Frazier do that?
William Munney is offline   Reply With Quote


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2015 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2015 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum
no new posts