Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
 • Intelligent and friendly discussions.
 • It's free and it's quick. Always.
 • Enter events in the forums calendar.
 • Very user friendly software.
 • Exclusive contests and giveaways.

 Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
 Our 2013 Goal: $400.00 - To Date: $00.00 (00.00%)
 Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact Pittsburgh Steelers Forum Feed Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.

Go Back   Steelers Fever Forums > Steelers Football > Pittsburgh Steelers


Steelers Fever Fan Shop

Doc's Sports Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.

Steelers Steelers - Giants Giants
August 9th, 2014, 7:30pmET

CBS
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-16-2012, 08:17 AM   #1
rrage
Draft Prospect
 

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 50
Member Number: 15072
Thanks: 15
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default Accurate article from Boston on Den/Steelers

Belichick won't make mistake Steelers did vs. Tebow
By Tony Massarotti, Globe columnist

The legend of Tim Tebow grows, only fueled by the happenings on Sunday in the Mile High City. But in his private moments this week, Patriots coach Bill Belichick is likely scoffing at what the Pittsburgh Steelers did to themselves, too.
It seems impossible to think Belichick will make the same mistake.

The NFL being the NFL, there is still the chance the Broncos will stun the Patriots and the football world on Saturday night by upsetting the Patriots at Gillette Stadium. But it is not likely. If the Broncos do somehow manage to pull off the seemingly impossible - the Patriots are overwhelming favorites - they will likely have to do it in far different fashion than the manner in which they beat the Steelers, at least on the offensive side of the ball.

Belichick, after all, is not likely to leave a makeshift New England secondary in 1-on-1 coverage the way the Steelers did, even if he refuses to say so.

Photos: Why we care about Tim Tebow
Photos: Meet the other Broncos

"You know, each team plays their own defensive scheme against them, whether it’s Buffalo or Kansas City or Pittsburgh or whoever it is," Belichick told reporters yesterday when asked if Pittsburgh's defensive approach against the Broncos was at all revealing. "We have our scheme. We’ll take some things from each game that we’ve seen and try to apply it to what we do. We’re not them, they’re not us, we have different players - same thing with Kansas City, Buffalo and all that. There’s certainly a lot to be learned but at the same time, we have our own matchups and we’re different from everybody else."
Translation: We're not going to play it the way the Steelers did, but we wouldn't have done that anyway ... Oh, and the Steelers were dumb.

Check that.

The Steelers were downright astonishingly and historically stupid.

Professional football is obviously a detailed, complex game, but even in the most simplistic terms, what the Steelers did against the Broncos Sunday made no sense and reeked of arrogance. Against an inaccurate and inconsistent quarterback who sometimes looks as if he's playing pin-the-tail-on-the-donkey, the Steelers left themselves vulnerable to the big play. Rather than make Tebow surgically maneuver his way down the field - something he has not proven he can do - the Steelers allowed Tebow to play a risk-reward game that Tebow exploited to the max.

Think about it: Tebow completed fewer than 50 percent of his passes - 47.6 percent, to be precise - but still threw for 316 yards while averaging 31.6 yards per completion. In basketball parlance, the Steelers packed the paint against someone whose only chance was to hit 3-pointers, which Tebow did.

Dumb.

Dumb, dumb, dumb.

As we all know, statistics can be deceiving and are easily manipulated in any argument, but they're worth discussing here. For example, on all throws that traveled more than 40 yards in the air this season, the overall completion percentage in the NFL was 23.3 percent. On 257 attempts - an average of just eight per team, or one every two games - quarterbacks threw 23 touchdowns and 25 interceptions for an overall rating of 69.4. The bottom line is that the deep ball is generally an absurdly low-percentage and inefficient throw, even for someone like Tom Brady, who was 1 for 8 on such attempts.

The only team that was better than 50 percent on long throws during the regular season? The Cleveland Browns, who went 1 for 1.

Before Sunday, during his time as a starter, Tebow was 0 for 5 on throws of more than 40 yards. Most everybody(end) has a poor percentage on the long throws, which is why they are rarely attempted. Nonetheless, Tebow went 1 for 1 on such attempts Sunday, completing a 51-yard strike to Demaryius Thomas early in the second quarter (with the Steelers holding a 6-0 edge) because the Steelers left Ike Taylor isolated against Thomas on the left sideline.

Even then, Denver still had the ball on only the Pittsburgh 31-yard line. The Steelers could have stiffened and held the Broncos to a field goal. Instead, the Steelers went right back to the same defense, allowing a 30-yard strike from Tebow to Eddie Royal (in man coverage) two plays later, giving Denver a 7-6 lead.

After that, the Steelers kept making the same mistake over and over again, particularly on the intermediate routes where only the great quarterbacks make their money. In the process, they turned Tebow from a mediocre quarterback (at best) to a world-beater.

For what it's worth, here are Tebow's passer ratings on throws of different lengths both for his time as a starter and Sunday's win over the Steelers:

Season Sunday
1-10 yards 68.7 28.6
11-20 yards 74.5 129.5
21-30 yards 84.1 156.3
31-40 yards 78.9 39.6
Staggering, right? On throws from 11-30 yards against the Steelers on Sunday, Tebow performed (at least statistically) like Peyton Manning. So was that because Tebow learned to read defenses and developed uncanny accuracy between Week 17 and the playoffs? Or was it because the Steelers played illogically aggressive defense that left their corners on an island (especially Taylor) and allowed Denver receivers to run wild after the catch?

Go back and look at Tebow's 80-yard, game-winning throw to Thomas in overtime. The line of scrimmage is the Denver 20-yard line. Thomas catches the ball at about the 38- or 39-yard line. By leaving Taylor in 1-on-1 coverage - with no help in the middle of the field - all Tebow had to do was complete an 18- or 19-yard pass (against man coverage) to get an 80-yard touchdown. Had the Steelers just played zone, they likely would have given up an incompletion - or maybe a 5-yard run.

During the regular season, after all, Tebow's overall completion percentage of 46.5 ranked 34th among 34 qualifying NFL quarterbacks. Nice move, Mike Tomlin. You too, Dick LeBeau. Instead of letting Tebow fire the ball into the ground (or at your defenders) by playing a more crowded zone - particularly in an age when man-to-man defense is becoming virtually impossible - you opted to reward him with big gains for easier throws.

Knuckleheads.

Say this for Belichick: seemingly settled on playing a more aggressive, attacking defense this season that was intent on getting after the quarterback and relying on the coverage skills of Devin McCourty, he scrapped the plan early. Belichick decided right then and there that his defensive backs couldn't cover. The Patriots may not win a championship this year because their defense remains suspect against above-average quarterback play, but they also weren't going to win 13 games during the regular season with McCourty repeatedly getting beaten over the top.

So Belichick went to Plan B, in which he asked the Patriots to sit back against a succession of second-rate quarterbacks from Tyler Palko, Vince Young and Dan Orlovsky to Rex Grossman, Matt Moore and, yes, Tebow.

Which is why Belichick will do the same thing Saturday night, sacrificing the run and challenging Tebow to keep up with Brady by staying on the ground.

Even with a hobbled Ben Roethlisberger at quarterback, that is something the Steelers should have been able to figure out.
rrage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2012, 08:42 AM   #2
Ricco Suavez
Head Coach
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,868
Member Number: 7718
Thanks: 96
Thanked 766 Times in 341 Posts
Default Re: Accurate article from Boston on Den/Steelers

Hind sight is a wonderful thing, a person can appear to be smarter than others by examining their mistakes. LeBeau has more knowledge about defense than Belichek has in his entire body. Dick had either the wrong game plan or his personnel did not perform or simply had too many injuries to starters and a backup. While I agree now in hindsight that our gameplan was faulty i still give LeBeau some slack. A bigger concern for me as far as the D is our lack of putting any pressure on other teams QB. Secondary will always be at risk if opposing QBs have the time we have allowed lately.
Ricco Suavez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2012, 09:03 AM   #3
zsheik22
Bench Warmer
 

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 369
Member Number: 9466
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Accurate article from Boston on Den/Steelers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricco Suavez View Post
Hind sight is a wonderful thing, a person can appear to be smarter than others by examining their mistakes. LeBeau has more knowledge about defense than Belichek has in his entire body. Dick had either the wrong game plan or his personnel did not perform or simply had too many injuries to starters and a backup. While I agree now in hindsight that our gameplan was faulty i still give LeBeau some slack. A bigger concern for me as far as the D is our lack of putting any pressure on other teams QB. Secondary will always be at risk if opposing QBs have the time we have allowed lately.



Lebeau didnt make the right matchups. It happens. To make excuses for him is ridiculous, though. He is good enough and has done a lot for this franchise... I am dumbfounded by the people that want him gone. That said, he still had a seemingly bad game plan and didnt adjust well enough after Thomas had 100 yards at the half.


I dont even want to get on Arians.... just bad. The worst.
zsheik22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2012, 09:07 AM   #4
TRH
Living Legend
 
TRH's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: eastern PA
Posts: 4,391
Gender: Male
Member Number: 17206
Thanks: 98
Thanked 222 Times in 155 Posts
Default Re: Accurate article from Boston on Den/Steelers

alot of good points in the article...
-Steelers arrogance
-poor coaching
-staying "the course" and not adjusting for Tebow
-Belichik being much smarter and would not allow that to happen
all true points.

On the other hand, he mentions that we had an "aggressive" defensive scheme that put our corners on an island. We may have put the corners on an "island", but where was the aggressiveness??? It certainly didn't show up any more.

Also, an ulterior motive for the writer here it the fact that they REALLY wanted to beat Pittsburgh and didn't get their chance. In New England, its similar to the Browns and Raven's territory....it's one of their "super bowls" to beat Pittsburgh.
Still, Tomlin and his staff have to be thoroughly embarrassed to the hilt.
TRH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2012, 10:15 AM   #5
Goldsteel86
Assistant Coach
Supporter
 
Goldsteel86's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,407
Member Number: 16432
Thanks: 351
Thanked 853 Times in 493 Posts
Default Re: Accurate article from Boston on Den/Steelers

Quote:
Originally Posted by zsheik22 View Post
Lebeau didnt make the right matchups. It happens. To make excuses for him is ridiculous, though. He is good enough and has done a lot for this franchise... I am dumbfounded by the people that want him gone. That said, he still had a seemingly bad game plan and didnt adjust well enough after Thomas had 100 yards at the half.


I dont even want to get on Arians.... just bad. The worst.
The bottom line, the players didn't execute, no pressure on Tebow, NE proved, get pressure on Tebow and it is all over. Don't blame LeBeau, it isn't him, it is a failure to execute!
Goldsteel86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2012, 10:28 AM   #6
BKAnthem
Assistant Coach
 

Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,066
Member Number: 13149
Thanks: 335
Thanked 154 Times in 106 Posts
Default Re: Accurate article from Boston on Den/Steelers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goldsteel86 View Post
The bottom line, the players didn't execute, no pressure on Tebow, NE proved, get pressure on Tebow and it is all over. Don't blame LeBeau, it isn't him, it is a failure to execute!
It is partially Lebaus fault, he's been around long enough to know there is more that one way to get to a QB...safety Blitz, CB blitz, or help over the top for Ike something to slow Tebow down...bottom line...he should have known better every Steeler fan in America knows less football than Lebau and we saw how terrible that game plan was...Ike had a bad game...but Lebau had a far worse one...and Injuries are no excuse everyone that was on that field gets playing time so they all know their Jobs and responsibilities .....Lets hope they all learned something and make the necessary adjustments next season Starting with a New OC and upgrades on the Oline
BKAnthem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2012, 10:48 AM   #7
madtowndrunkard
Team Captain
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 917
Member Number: 11280
Thanks: 1
Thanked 92 Times in 51 Posts
Default Re: Accurate article from Boston on Den/Steelers

This article says exactly what everyone was thinking while watching the game. It was so blatantly obvious what we were trying to do was not working.

I agree with the writer, what we were trying to do in the first place was beyond stupid. how we took the week to come up with that game plan is just unfathomable. But as someone said, hind sight is 20/20.

So lets for a second assume DL and Tomlin had a sound game plan. For that plan to work we had to get pressure on Tebow and force him to hurry or run. By the 2nd quarter it was pretty obvious none of it was working. Our LB's were not getting pressure. Our secondary was not holding up 1 on 1. Tebow was making throws good enough to beat us deep....he was actually looking down field, something he never did. To add to the bad situation our offense was struggling.

So what really makes no sense is the fact we stuck with this plan, even in OT. It appears to me that we were so deathly afraid of their ability to run that we just threw all common sense out the window and stuck with the idea, if we stop their run there is no way Tebow beats us. After getting burnt time and time again I just don't understand why we stuck with it.

If this was all on DL, where the heck was Mike Tomlin? After all he is our HC..and he has defensive experience. How do you not tell your assistants to change things up? There is no way to defend what happened. The coaches and players have to be wondering why on earth they did what they did. If there ever was a loss you can pin 100% on the coaching staff, this was it.
madtowndrunkard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2012, 10:56 AM   #8
Danny136200
Bench Warmer
 

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 245
Member Number: 17651
Thanks: 33
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Accurate article from Boston on Den/Steelers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricco Suavez View Post
Hind sight is a wonderful thing, a person can appear to be smarter than others by examining their mistakes. LeBeau has more knowledge about defense than Belichek has in his entire body. Dick had either the wrong game plan or his personnel did not perform or simply had too many injuries to starters and a backup. While I agree now in hindsight that our gameplan was faulty i still give LeBeau some slack. A bigger concern for me as far as the D is our lack of putting any pressure on other teams QB. Secondary will always be at risk if opposing QBs have the time we have allowed lately.
We played the same way against the patriots. The difference was that woodley and the dline was getting pressure to Brady constantly, the steelers didn't even have a sack or even a qb pressure against the broncos
Danny136200 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2012, 11:28 AM   #9
madtowndrunkard
Team Captain
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 917
Member Number: 11280
Thanks: 1
Thanked 92 Times in 51 Posts
Default Re: Accurate article from Boston on Den/Steelers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danny136200 View Post
We played the same way against the patriots. The difference was that woodley and the dline was getting pressure to Brady constantly, the steelers didn't even have a sack or even a qb pressure against the broncos

We did not use the same defensive strategy. We played man coverage but we kept the safeties back and we were able to pressure Brady because he couldn't hit his short timing routes because of the bump coverage...and the deep passes were taken away by our safeties. They were taken by surprise....they were expecting the usual steeler 5-10 yard cushion...so I think their plan was probably to beat us with short passes w/ plenty of YAC....like how they always beat us.

By the time they could change things up we already had a pretty big lead so it made them one dimensional....and they still made it interesting in the end. The reason we won mostly because of Ben and the offense actually scoring points early.
madtowndrunkard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2012, 12:29 PM   #10
Curtain_of_Steel
Head Coach
Supporter
 

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,630
Member Number: 11678
Thanks: 54
Thanked 58 Times in 40 Posts
Default Re: Accurate article from Boston on Den/Steelers

That says it all, the word STUPID. They played that way several times this years. STUPID!. Let Flacco drive 92 yards in a prevent def all the way till he scored. Played off the line. Stupid. We do it constantly, play off th eline because we are afraid on a 3 and 2 they might throw a bomb. 2nd a 2 you go bomb, 3 and 2, you go 3 yard pass. Every time whoeever played us, nailed us. With exception of 1 game, against the Pats we played tight.

Stupid, stupid stupid. Its like Alzhiemers sets in on Dick during the games some times.
Curtain_of_Steel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum
no new posts