Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
 • Intelligent and friendly discussions.
 • It's free and it's quick. Always.
 • Enter events in the forums calendar.
 • Very user friendly software.
 • Exclusive contests and giveaways.

 Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
 Our 2014 Goal: $450.00 - To Date: $450.00 (100.00%)
 Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact Pittsburgh Steelers Forum Feed Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.

Go Back   Steelers Fever Forums > Steelers Football > Pittsburgh Steelers


Steelers Fever Fan Shop

Doc's Sports Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.

Steelers

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-07-2005, 12:43 PM   #1
stillers4strife
Draft Prospect
 

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 74
Member Number: 400
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default TE Factoids, How important are they, anyway?

After the Steelers drafted Heath Miller, I wondered how much he would be used as a receiving TE v. a blocking TE. Being that he was picked in the 1st round, I figured the Steelers had bigger plans for him than him just being an additional lineman. But that's predominantly what Steeler TE's have been in recent history. So I started to google up info on past Steeler TE's. And I came across this info:

Retrieved from this site: http://maximumgrilledsteelers.com/in...showtopic=2999

1. During the Steelers' 4 Superbowl title runs, the Tight End position accounted for 19.3% of the team's overall recieving yardage.

2. Averaging the Superbowl title runs of all 39 previous winners, the Tight End position accounted for 17.6% of the teams' overall recieving yardage.

3. During Chuck Noll's tenure ('69-'91) as Head Coach, the Tight End position accounted for 13.8% of the team's overall recieving yardage.

4. Since 1969, the Steelers have won 11+ games ten times. During those years, the Tight End position accounted for 13.1% of the team's overall recieving yardage.

5. Since 1969, the Steelers qualified for the playoffs 20 times. During those years, the Tight End position accounted for 13.0% of the team's overall recieving yardage.

6. During Bill Cowher's tenure ('92-present) as Head Coach, the Tight End position accounted for 9.5% of the team's overall recieving yardage.


It shows a pretty good overview of TE's during Noll's era and Cowher's era. Looking back to the time that Eric Green was on the team, the TE accounted for quite a bit of the total receiving yards. What the info. doesn't tell us is TD's and catches/catches for 1st downs which is important info too.
__________________
www.maximumgrilledsteelers.com
stillers4strife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2005, 12:44 PM   #2
stillers4strife
Draft Prospect
 

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 74
Member Number: 400
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: TE Factoids, How important are they, anyway?

If you look under the 2nd spread sheet listed in the link at the beginning of this thread, since the first Superbowl, only 5 of the 39 teams winning the Superbowl have had TE receiving % in the single digits. That percentage represents the TE's % of the overall annual passing yards.

What does that say? Something? Nothing?

What it doesn't look at is number of catches or TD's. And that can sometimes be more important that yardage.

What it might say is that it isn't absolutely necessary to involve the TE in the passing game in order to win the Superbowl. But it probably hints that modest involvement of the TE in the passing game is a characteristic of teams winning the Superbowl. While catches or TD's aren't listed, the yardage that the TE's account for is in the double-digits for most Superbowl Champs.
__________________
www.maximumgrilledsteelers.com
stillers4strife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2005, 01:27 PM   #3
BB2W
Team Owner
Supporter
 
BB2W's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Your Mom's
Posts: 2,685
Gender: Male
Member Number: 328
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: TE Factoids, How important are they, anyway?

Good post! The facts speak for themselves.......I have always said we must throw the the TE more.

I think the most telling facts are that the last 39 SB winners averaged 19.5, and only five were in single digits like us.
__________________
BB2W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2005, 01:42 PM   #4
stillers4strife
Draft Prospect
 

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 74
Member Number: 400
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: TE Factoids, How important are they, anyway?

Thanks! New here but always looking for info on the Steelers.

The spreadsheets don't give info on TD's but I guess those could be misleading too. Tuman (who I think is a reasonable #2 TE) had 3 TD's last year and had a TD-to-catch ratio of 33%. Which looks damn good. But breaking that ratio down a bit more shows he had 3 TDs on 9 catches, which makes the % good but overall shows we're lacking in utilizing the TE in the passing game. So the number of catches becomes important too.
stillers4strife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2005, 04:24 PM   #5
clevestinks
Living Legend
Supporter
 
clevestinks's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,326
Member Number: 302
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: TE Factoids, How important are they, anyway?

I`m all for spreading the defense. But is a TE necessary for our type of offense. Probably not, but it will be nice having that extra option in our arsenal. Great defense, a great running game. a smart qb with a cannon for a right arm. WR`s like Hines , El, and Wilson, and now a TE. Look out ! Detroit here we come!

Great Research stillers!
__________________
<b>BLEEDING BLACK & GOLD IN OHIO</b>[
clevestinks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2005, 05:56 PM   #6
Ironman
Draft Prospect
 
Ironman's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Willie's Alma Mater
Posts: 137
Gender: Male
Member Number: 320
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: TE Factoids, How important are they, anyway?

I think the threat of a receiving TE is enough to keep defenses honest.
__________________
Ironman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2005, 10:46 PM   #7
BlitzburghRockCity
Banned
 
BlitzburghRockCity's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Central PA.
Posts: 8,144
Gender: Male
Member Number: 70
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: TE Factoids, How important are they, anyway?

Quote:
Originally Posted by clevestinks
I`m all for spreading the defense. But is a TE necessary for our type of offense. Probably not, but it will be nice having that extra option in our arsenal. Great defense, a great running game. a smart qb with a cannon for a right arm. WR`s like Hines , El, and Wilson, and now a TE. Look out ! Detroit here we come!

Great Research stillers!

You can make a case for a TE being a big part of our offense and making a difference..but unless BC has a HUGE change of mind.. which he could but.... the TE is always going to be mainly a blocker and basically and extra OL w/ good hands to make the occasional catch down the middle of the field, or in the corner of the endzone, or catching a Bettis TD throw.
BlitzburghRockCity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2005, 12:49 AM   #8
ironcitychef
Assistant Coach
Supporter
 
ironcitychef's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,384
Gender: Male
Member Number: 109
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: TE Factoids, How important are they, anyway?

S4S, I hope you get comfortable here at SF cause I love crunching numbers.

For the numbers, lets see who those four teams are: Green Bay '68, San Fran '85, Wash, '92,
St. Louis '00. No slouches for teams in their time by any means so something else must be the reason? I think it does go back to the principle of keeping teams guessing. You can't be skewed too far in one direction. Those four teams had the talent to run and pass. Just turns out they didn't pass to the TE those years. Why not? Didn't need to. My numbers:

'68 Pack - 446 rushing attempts. Lowest back had a healthy 3.2 avg per carry. Sorry no NFL rankings back then I guess.

'85 49'ers - 534 rushing attempts. #2 NFL rank in YPAttempt

'92 Skins - 540 attempts - #1 NFL rank in Attempts

'00 Rams - 431 attempts - #2 YPAttempt

So you see, having a TE to bail out an average running game is good, but if you can run effectively and not just consistently you can winn as well. Our problem last year...

'04 Steelers - 618 attempts - #19 YPAttempt

So then question back at the forum...will Miller be the TE that helps an average/above average running game, or that threat that allows us to run effectively better by pulling one guy deeper for an instant longer to give us a couple yards more on the ground?
Well, if this thread doesn't make us the M.I.T. of fan boards I don't know what will. Lets see the others keep up.
__________________
ironcitychef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2005, 10:42 AM   #9
STEEL-MAN
Draft Prospect
 

Join Date: May 2005
Location: baltimore
Posts: 98
Member Number: 391
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: TE Factoids, How important are they, anyway?

A guy like Miller with good hands and is able to get open may catch a lot of passes or at least the important ones, watching them in the red zone will be interesting.
STEEL-MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2005, 11:40 AM   #10
stillers4strife
Draft Prospect
 

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 74
Member Number: 400
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: TE Factoids, How important are they, anyway?

Ironcitychef....I do enjoy looking at numbers and trying to figure what they represent/don't represent v. what they were intended to represent.

That being the case, I should say that the guy who wrote the article is the one compiling the data and doing a pretty good job of it IMO. I'm just trying to pick it apart.

I think, as with almost anything in stats, there absolutely isn't a cause-effect relationship between involving the TE in the passing game and winning the Superbowl. Now there might be a correlation between the two. I think you have to first determine how much involvement by the TE in the passing game is acceptable as "enough" or "ample." Since the guy looks at percentages, maybe rising into the double-digits of percentages is a market for adequate usage. That's just a subjective mark on my behalf but since we were sitting at 6.5% last year, a move to 10% would be a 65% increase. The 6.5% of course represents the TE receiving yards as a percentage of total receiving yards by the team. Ultimately, I think you have to set your own acceptable mark for TE involvement. There might be some kind of objective standard that could be accepted to reduce biases and errors. But it probably won't come from me. Football stats seem inherently subjective to me...at least how they're interpreted so different personalities will see and use them differently.

That said, I noticed he updated his thread this morning to look at the 39 Superbowl winners and how they spread the ball around. This includes to the TE but also the WR's and RB's.

I'm not sure if I should cut and paste what he posted today or not. I don't want it to come across as though I wrote/compiled the data because I didn't. But he posted it under a section of the board where you have to register for the board to view the info. So I'll post the link for anyone really interested in viewing the numbers. In the meantime, I'll try to contact the guy via email to see if it's okay if I copy/paste and post any more of his info for others to see.

Here's the link: http://maximumgrilledsteelers.com/in...showtopic=3077
stillers4strife is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum
no new posts