Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
 • Intelligent and friendly discussions.
 • It's free and it's quick. Always.
 • Enter events in the forums calendar.
 • Very user friendly software.
 • Exclusive contests and giveaways.

 Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
 Our 2014 Goal: $450.00 - To Date: $450.00 (100.00%)
 Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact Pittsburgh Steelers Forum Feed Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.

Go Back   Steelers Fever Forums > Steelers Football > Pittsburgh Steelers


Steelers Fever Fan Shop

Doc's Sports Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.

Steelers

View Poll Results: Giving Wallace 9 mil a year
For it 15 27.78%
Against it 31 57.41%
on the fence 8 14.81%
Voters: 54. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-10-2012, 05:59 PM   #1
pancake
Head Coach
 
pancake's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,817
Gender: Male
Member Number: 13552
Thanks: 308
Thanked 530 Times in 273 Posts
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default For or against giving Wallace 9 Million a year?

Would you be opposed or against a 9 million a year for Wallace for 4-6 years?
pancake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 06:04 PM   #2
pancake
Head Coach
 
pancake's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,817
Gender: Male
Member Number: 13552
Thanks: 308
Thanked 530 Times in 273 Posts
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: For or against giving Wallace 9 Million a year?

I haven't voted yet, but I'm leaning on "for it". I think that will become a normal price for #1 wr.
pancake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 06:23 PM   #3
steeltheone
Living Legend
Supporter
 
steeltheone's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Harrisburg Pa.
Posts: 3,475
Gender: Male
Member Number: 6351
Thanks: 278
Thanked 381 Times in 227 Posts
Default Re: For or against giving Wallace 9 Million a year?

It's Wallace or Brown...One or the other
__________________
Perfection is not attainable, but if we chase perfection we can catch excellence." - Vince Lombardi
steeltheone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 10:37 PM   #4
Steelersfan87
Assistant Coach
 

Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,476
Member Number: 18585
Thanks: 14
Thanked 40 Times in 30 Posts
Default Re: For or against giving Wallace 9 Million a year?

Quote:
Originally Posted by steeltheone View Post
It's Wallace or Brown...One or the other
No it's not.

For it.
Steelersfan87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 10:38 PM   #5
fer522
ACERERO
 
fer522's Avatar
 
Archery 2000 Champion! Archery Champion! Galaxians Champion! Apple Shooter Champion!
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: right here
Posts: 3,354
Gender: Male
Member Number: 16190
Thanks: 4,029
Thanked 2,240 Times in 994 Posts
My Mood: Mellow
Default Re: For or against giving Wallace 9 Million a year?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pancake View Post
I haven't voted yet, but I'm leaning on "for it". I think that will become a normal price for #1 wr.
He's not a #1 receiver
He's still a one trick pony IMO
__________________
Sent from my house using my PC
fer522 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 11:22 PM   #6
Black N' Yellow
Draft Prospect
 

Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 77
Member Number: 19123
Thanks: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
Default Re: For or against giving Wallace 9 Million a year?

He has the potential to rack up the yardage to make him worth Fitzgerald/Johnson money in the future. Brown's a great receiver, but I think he largely benefits from Wallace. But next year they will both benefit from forcing teams to cover both of them and still account for Sanders and Cotchery who are both more than capable of being number 2 receivers on several teams...

If things work out, we are going to be ridiculously stacked at receiver in the future.
Black N' Yellow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2012, 11:26 PM   #7
BLACK_AND_YELLOW
Team President
 
BLACK_AND_YELLOW's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,096
Gender: Male
Member Number: 18312
Thanks: 954
Thanked 2,857 Times in 1,256 Posts
My Mood: Amused
Default Re: For or against giving Wallace 9 Million a year?

Quote:
Originally Posted by fer522 View Post
He's not a #1 receiver
He's still a one trick pony IMO
Wallace has made some good plays going across the field just like the 53 yard TD catch he did against the Raiders...

Bruce never gave him a chance to go across the middle
BLACK_AND_YELLOW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 12:01 AM   #8
Mistah_Q
Starter
 
Mistah_Q's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 477
Gender: Male
Member Number: 5514
Thanks: 63
Thanked 345 Times in 143 Posts
Default Re: For or against giving Wallace 9 Million a year?

Totally against it.

Sign Brown and Sanders long term to be our 1 and 2 - that's going to be real nice for us. Cotchery is our slot guy for potentially a few more years, develop some of these other guys for depth and situational play.

Wallace will sign his tender; if he takes his demands and services elsewhere the next season we're not going to miss him really. It's time we started sinking our luxury spending into the O-line and D-line. if you can always win the trenches, the rest can fall into place.
__________________

"You are going to let the fear of poverty govern your life and your reward will be that you will eat, but you will not live." - George Bernard Shaw
Mistah_Q is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 12:20 AM   #9
TheVet
Assistant Coach
 
TheVet's Avatar
 
Space Invaders Champion! Snake Champion! Simon Champion! Speartoss 5 Shots Champion!
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,266
Member Number: 24040
Thanks: 424
Thanked 528 Times in 301 Posts
Default Re: For or against giving Wallace 9 Million a year?

Against it. Love Wallace, but I'm looking for him to take a few more steps. It's premature until he does.
TheVet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 12:22 AM   #10
tony hipchest
IRONMAN a.k.a. Tony Stark
 
tony hipchest's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Give me back my game...
Posts: 39,865
Member Number: 658
Thanks: 2,147
Thanked 9,530 Times in 3,968 Posts
Default Re: For or against giving Wallace 9 Million a year?

im for it. 4 years from now, $9 mil will be dirt cheap for his services.

Quote:
Originally Posted by fer522 View Post
He's not a #1 receiver
He's still a one trick pony IMO
buddy ryan once tried to convince everyone that viking's great chris carter was a 1 trick pony. "all he does is catch touchdowns".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mistah_Q View Post
Totally against it.

Sign Brown and Sanders long term to be our 1 and 2 - that's going to be real nice for us. Cotchery is our slot guy for potentially a few more years, develop some of these other guys for depth and situational play.

Wallace will sign his tender; if he takes his demands and services elsewhere the next season we're not going to miss him really. It's time we started sinking our luxury spending into the O-line and D-line. if you can always win the trenches, the rest can fall into place.
im certainly not against this fiscally sound line of thinking either. giants, patriots, packers, saints didnt need top 5 paid wr's to make it to the superbowl, lead the league in offense or scoring, break passing records etc.
__________________
tony hipchest is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum
no new posts