Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
 • Intelligent and friendly discussions.
 • It's free and it's quick. Always.
 • Enter events in the forums calendar.
 • Very user friendly software.
 • Exclusive contests and giveaways.

 Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
 Our 2014 Goal: $450.00 - To Date: $450.00 (100.00%)
 Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact Pittsburgh Steelers Forum Feed Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.

Go Back   Steelers Fever Forums > Steelers Football > Pittsburgh Steelers


Steelers Fever Fan Shop

Doc's Sports Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.

Steelers

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-07-2013, 01:50 PM   #81
Bane
Head Coach
 
Bane's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,886
Member Number: 24775
Thanks: 2,548
Thanked 3,260 Times in 1,312 Posts
Default Re: Mike Wallace turned down $10 million a yr deal from Steelers

Thank ya!

Yeah, they were probably hoping he'd cave. I think they're better off without him, and I hope they finally sign/draft a decent receiver above 6'1".
Bane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2013, 01:51 PM   #82
Steelers5895
Starter
 
Steelers5895's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 543
Member Number: 23994
Thanks: 6
Thanked 164 Times in 104 Posts
Default Re: Mike Wallace turned down $10 million a yr deal from Steelers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawaii 5-0 View Post
What Did The Mike Wallace Holdout Prove To The Steelers Or His Free Agency Last Season?

February 6, 2013
By LG

Mike Wallace certainly didnít do a lot to prove his case, did he? He wanted the same kind of money that Larry Fitzgerald was making. Wallace decided to hold out and play hard ball with the Rooney family. Then he comes into camp and has his second worst season since coming to the Steelers. Wallace caught 64 passes for 836 yards. I know what youíre thinking, he did catch 4 more passes than his 2010 season, but his yards were what I am talking about when I say his second worst season.

Wallace should have come into camp and went out and played like a warrior who couldnít be stopped last season. He made a fool out of himself holding out for the kind of money he wanted. Then to have a mediocre season and not helping the Steelers the way he should have isnít exactly speaking loud for his cause to make more money. If other teams were smart and you know they are, they would take a hard look at the way Wallace played for the Steelers in 2012.

He could have had a better season and he dropped a lot of passes that Mike Wallace would have caught earlier in his career. I am not saying Wallace is done in football. I am saying he still doesnít deserve the kind of money he thinks he does. Wallace still has to prove himself. Wallace finished the 2012 season ranked 34th on the receiving list. That isnít exactly placing him in the upper class of NFL receivers is it. He is 1,128 yards away form the top ranked receiver in the NFL and 514 yards away from being a top ten receiver.

Wallace proved one thing in the 2012 season. He proved he is for himself and not the team. If he was for his team he would have his butt into camp and produced the kind of season a winner produces. Wallace didnít do that in 2012 and for a guy who is going to test the free agent market, he should have.

http://network.yardbarker.com/nfl/ar...rpaid/12855715
this is exactly why a lot of steelers fan have soured on wallace. As I also said, he should have went " balls to the wall" this year and instead he played like a punk.
__________________
Win If You Can...Lose If You Must...But Always Cheat! Ken Patera
Steelers5895 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2013, 02:09 PM   #83
SteelersCanada
Living Legend
Supporter
 
SteelersCanada's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 7,951
Member Number: 24400
Thanks: 6,126
Thanked 11,034 Times in 4,577 Posts
Default Re: Mike Wallace turned down $10 million a yr deal from Steelers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bane View Post
Thank ya!

Yeah, they were probably hoping he'd cave. I think they're better off without him, and I hope they finally sign/draft a decent receiver above 6'1".
Shouldn't you be off causing mayhem and destruction? This time, preferably not at Heinz Field.

Welcome aboard.
SteelersCanada is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2013, 02:14 PM   #84
Bane
Head Coach
 
Bane's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,886
Member Number: 24775
Thanks: 2,548
Thanked 3,260 Times in 1,312 Posts
Default Re: Mike Wallace turned down $10 million a yr deal from Steelers

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelersCanada View Post
Shouldn't you be off causing mayhem and destruction? This time, preferably not at Heinz Field.

Welcome aboard.
Did you not see my work at the Superdome?!

And thanks! Glad to be here!
Bane is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bane For This Useful Post:
harrison'samonster (02-07-2013), Hawaii 5-0 (02-07-2013), Lady Steel (02-07-2013)
Old 02-07-2013, 08:06 PM   #85
Hawaii 5-0
Armchair GM
Supporter
 
Hawaii 5-0's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: The Aloha State
Posts: 9,873
Gender: Male
Member Number: 24013
Thanks: 9,511
Thanked 12,603 Times in 5,205 Posts
My Mood: Amazed
Default Re: Mike Wallace turned down $10 million a yr deal from Steelers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bane View Post
Did you not see my work at the Superdome?!
that was very, very impressive!
Hawaii 5-0 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2013, 08:08 PM   #86
Lady Steel
Queen Bee
Supporter
 
Lady Steel's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 4,884
Gender: Female
Member Number: 16396
Thanks: 17,561
Thanked 6,616 Times in 2,519 Posts
My Mood: Happy
Default Re: Mike Wallace turned down $10 million a yr deal from Steelers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bane View Post
Did you not see my work at the Superdome?!

And thanks! Glad to be here!
Love the user name. Welcome to Steelers Fever!
Lady Steel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2013, 11:24 PM   #87
Hawaii 5-0
Armchair GM
Supporter
 
Hawaii 5-0's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: The Aloha State
Posts: 9,873
Gender: Male
Member Number: 24013
Thanks: 9,511
Thanked 12,603 Times in 5,205 Posts
My Mood: Amazed
Default Re: Mike Wallace turned down $10 million a yr deal from Steelers

Former Bears Johnny Knox validates concerns of almost-former Steelers Mike Wallace

By SteelCityRoller on Feb 14
Jonathan Daniel



With a roster grown fat with aging defensive veterans and their championship-worthy salaries, the Steelers found themselves stretching the elasticity of the NFL salary cap Speedo teams are forced to perform within. The team was doing everything it could to keep itself together, hoping nothing unfortunate slipped out the sides along the way.

Like it or not, Mike Wallace had a point.

The Pittsburgh Steelers found themselves in a bind heading into 2012 as their top receiver watched his rookie contract expire giving the team the right to offer him a restricted free-agency tender, knowing their second and third receivers would be in the exact same position the following year; meaning the team would need to prepare itself for their impending unrestricted free-agencies.

Wallace, while not officially the leader on the depth chart, was definitely the production lead the previous two seasons, as the team found ways to use his unique speed to exploit aggressive defenses or provide a decoy to open zones for Hines Ward, Emmanuel Sanders and Antonio Brown.

With a roster grown fat with aging defensive veterans and their championship-worthy salaries, the Steelers found themselves stretching the elasticity of the NFL salary cap Speedo teams are forced to perform within. The team was doing everything it could to keep itself together, hoping nothing unfortunate slipped out the sides along the way.

The team took the safe route and offered Wallace the maximum RFA tender level - $2.742 million - which would have required any team which might consider offering him a better deal to return a first-round draft pick as compensation, should he accept their offer and the Steelers decline to match. This would permit the team to delay any decisions until the following off-season (now) to negotiate new contracts, as they would have a better view of how to handle the well-paid ring bearers clinging onto hopes of one last trophy run.

Wallace, however, did not agree. He felt he had earned his spot as the team's top receiver for franchise QB Ben Roethlisberger, and wanted the team to offer him a long-term contract now. His insistence on immediacy stemmed from a fear of injury without a guaranteed future in the NFL. Had he suffered a career-changing injury while playing for his tender, he would have found a significant decline in his negotiating ranges. He even had no guarantee the Steelers would still want him should such a scenario degrade his natural, physical talents.

The team held firm to its decision, and Mike Wallace followed suit by refusing to sign the tender offered by the Steelers. He had little leverage to use a holdout as a negotiating tool. He was holding out to prove to the team how strongly he believed in his fear of a premature end to his NFL career, and how important it was to him to know he would be here long term, no matter what.

Fast-forward to 2013, and find reports of former Chicago Bears receiver Johnny Knox, who announced his retirement from the NFL due to injury, after a four year career.

Knox took his final hit as an NFL player against the Seattle Seahawks in December, 2011. He required spinal fusion surgery the following day, which forced him to miss the entire 2012 campaign. Even with constant rehabilitation, Knox is barely able to walk or stand without pain. Although his heart still has the desire to play, as reflected by his statement regarding playing again following his recent official release by Chicago; his body is no longer able or willing.

While the specifics of each situation do not mirror each other perfectly, the similarities between Knox and Wallace are undeniable. Knox would have played under the final year of his rookie contract in 2012. Knox reached the Pro Bowl his rookie season for special teams return performance. In 2010, he was the team's leading receiver, helping the Bears reach the NFC championship game; only to fall to the Green Bay Packers, who coincidentally went on to beat the Steelers in the Super Bowl.

Knox had performed well enough to warrant the team's consideration regarding a new contract to keep him in Chicago, once he reached the end of his rookie deal's obligations. Unfortunately, Knox never made it so far.

This is what Wallace was afraid of. His holdout had little to do with $2.742 million dollars not being enough money for playing a game for a living, or a deep resentment toward the team who showed him the most respect as far as draft selection. He wanted the long-term, secure contract he felt his statistics had earned.

Whether it is right for a player to put his own career's wants above the team's overall salary cap problems, or the career-wants of his teammates, is better reserved for a morals and values forum; but each NFL career has its own unpredictable shelf-life with only two certainties - it does have an end, and it's over before you know it.

In the end, Wallace escaped the 2012 season virtually unscathed and will enter free-agency without his health scribing stipulations; something Knox's career did not permit.. While Knox would have preferred to use such an opportunity to remain with his original team, Wallace seems intent on securing a contract which will prevent his career from being snuffed out unrewarded, like Knox's.

Knox should serve as a lesson to Wallace about being grateful for every opportunity you have to do something you may not be able to tomorrow, to players like Brown to play every day like there is no tomorrow, and to the league and team owners to continue to make the game safer and take care of those men whose lives are devastated and tossed aside after sacrificing their own health and well-being to support the league's very existence.

He should also serve as a reminder to fans to appreciate your favorite players while you have the opportunity, because they cannot play forever. Appreciate them while they're here, and what they give for the fans and the teams they worship.

They're always gone too soon.

http://www.behindthesteelcurtain.com...irement-injury
Hawaii 5-0 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2013, 03:10 PM   #88
lardlad
Bench Warmer
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 375
Member Number: 10897
Thanks: 376
Thanked 178 Times in 94 Posts
My Mood: Cynical
Default Re: Mike Wallace turned down $10 million a yr deal from Steelers

If the Rooney's didn't play close to the vest and handcuff Ben, Wallace would stay. And that meteor would never have struck Russia.
lardlad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2013, 07:49 PM   #89
TheVet
Assistant Coach
 
TheVet's Avatar
 
Space Invaders Champion! Snake Champion! Simon Champion! Speartoss 5 Shots Champion!
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,266
Member Number: 24040
Thanks: 424
Thanked 528 Times in 301 Posts
Default Re: Mike Wallace turned down $10 million a yr deal from Steelers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawaii 5-0 View Post
Former Bears Johnny Knox validates concerns of almost-former Steelers Mike Wallace

By SteelCityRoller on Feb 14
Jonathan Daniel



With a roster grown fat with aging defensive veterans and their championship-worthy salaries, the Steelers found themselves stretching the elasticity of the NFL salary cap Speedo teams are forced to perform within. The team was doing everything it could to keep itself together, hoping nothing unfortunate slipped out the sides along the way.

Like it or not, Mike Wallace had a point.

The Pittsburgh Steelers found themselves in a bind heading into 2012 as their top receiver watched his rookie contract expire giving the team the right to offer him a restricted free-agency tender, knowing their second and third receivers would be in the exact same position the following year; meaning the team would need to prepare itself for their impending unrestricted free-agencies.

Wallace, while not officially the leader on the depth chart, was definitely the production lead the previous two seasons, as the team found ways to use his unique speed to exploit aggressive defenses or provide a decoy to open zones for Hines Ward, Emmanuel Sanders and Antonio Brown.

With a roster grown fat with aging defensive veterans and their championship-worthy salaries, the Steelers found themselves stretching the elasticity of the NFL salary cap Speedo teams are forced to perform within. The team was doing everything it could to keep itself together, hoping nothing unfortunate slipped out the sides along the way.

The team took the safe route and offered Wallace the maximum RFA tender level - $2.742 million - which would have required any team which might consider offering him a better deal to return a first-round draft pick as compensation, should he accept their offer and the Steelers decline to match. This would permit the team to delay any decisions until the following off-season (now) to negotiate new contracts, as they would have a better view of how to handle the well-paid ring bearers clinging onto hopes of one last trophy run.

Wallace, however, did not agree. He felt he had earned his spot as the team's top receiver for franchise QB Ben Roethlisberger, and wanted the team to offer him a long-term contract now. His insistence on immediacy stemmed from a fear of injury without a guaranteed future in the NFL. Had he suffered a career-changing injury while playing for his tender, he would have found a significant decline in his negotiating ranges. He even had no guarantee the Steelers would still want him should such a scenario degrade his natural, physical talents.

The team held firm to its decision, and Mike Wallace followed suit by refusing to sign the tender offered by the Steelers. He had little leverage to use a holdout as a negotiating tool. He was holding out to prove to the team how strongly he believed in his fear of a premature end to his NFL career, and how important it was to him to know he would be here long term, no matter what.

Fast-forward to 2013, and find reports of former Chicago Bears receiver Johnny Knox, who announced his retirement from the NFL due to injury, after a four year career.

Knox took his final hit as an NFL player against the Seattle Seahawks in December, 2011. He required spinal fusion surgery the following day, which forced him to miss the entire 2012 campaign. Even with constant rehabilitation, Knox is barely able to walk or stand without pain. Although his heart still has the desire to play, as reflected by his statement regarding playing again following his recent official release by Chicago; his body is no longer able or willing.

While the specifics of each situation do not mirror each other perfectly, the similarities between Knox and Wallace are undeniable. Knox would have played under the final year of his rookie contract in 2012. Knox reached the Pro Bowl his rookie season for special teams return performance. In 2010, he was the team's leading receiver, helping the Bears reach the NFC championship game; only to fall to the Green Bay Packers, who coincidentally went on to beat the Steelers in the Super Bowl.

Knox had performed well enough to warrant the team's consideration regarding a new contract to keep him in Chicago, once he reached the end of his rookie deal's obligations. Unfortunately, Knox never made it so far.

This is what Wallace was afraid of. His holdout had little to do with $2.742 million dollars not being enough money for playing a game for a living, or a deep resentment toward the team who showed him the most respect as far as draft selection. He wanted the long-term, secure contract he felt his statistics had earned.

Whether it is right for a player to put his own career's wants above the team's overall salary cap problems, or the career-wants of his teammates, is better reserved for a morals and values forum; but each NFL career has its own unpredictable shelf-life with only two certainties - it does have an end, and it's over before you know it.

In the end, Wallace escaped the 2012 season virtually unscathed and will enter free-agency without his health scribing stipulations; something Knox's career did not permit.. While Knox would have preferred to use such an opportunity to remain with his original team, Wallace seems intent on securing a contract which will prevent his career from being snuffed out unrewarded, like Knox's.

Knox should serve as a lesson to Wallace about being grateful for every opportunity you have to do something you may not be able to tomorrow, to players like Brown to play every day like there is no tomorrow, and to the league and team owners to continue to make the game safer and take care of those men whose lives are devastated and tossed aside after sacrificing their own health and well-being to support the league's very existence.

He should also serve as a reminder to fans to appreciate your favorite players while you have the opportunity, because they cannot play forever. Appreciate them while they're here, and what they give for the fans and the teams they worship.

They're always gone too soon.

http://www.behindthesteelcurtain.com...irement-injury
Cool story, Johnny Daniel bro.

Except that you don't know what you're talking about, because the Steelers offered Wallace $10 m/year before finally tendering the RFA. But why let facts get in the way of a cool story?
__________________

The black and gold ostrich of rebuilding denial.
TheVet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2013, 02:09 PM   #90
Atlanta Dan
Resigned
Supporter
 
Atlanta Dan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,248
Member Number: 728
Thanks: 2,577
Thanked 8,245 Times in 3,621 Posts
Default Re: Mike Wallace turned down $10 million a yr deal from Steelers

Peter King indicates that if Wallace expects top dollar it will be with a bottom feeder team

It's going to be interesting to see which teams jump out for relatively young tackles, such as Brandon Albert of Kansas City, and wide receivers, such as Mike Wallace of Pittsburgh. Wallace, in particular, is facing an intriguing free-agency period because he took a risk in not re-signing with Pittsburgh for $7 million a season last year.

Though only 26, Wallace seems to be scaring off some teams with receiver needs because they perceive he is going to be asking for the moon. "I like Mike Wallace," said one general manager with a receiver need. "But I'm not paying him Vincent Jackson money. Not even close." Jackson, the former Charger, signed early in free agency with Tampa Bay last March for a contract averaging $11 million a year.

So I think you can look for a few players to get rich, particularly if they're willing to play in cash-rich places with losing histories like Cleveland.


http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/nfl...1_a6&eref=sihp
Atlanta Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum
no new posts